Advertisement

Becoming stronger by becoming weaker: the hunger strike as a mode of doing politics

  • Sebastian Abrahamsson
  • Endre DányiEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Drawing on Judith Butler’s work and a series of studies associated with actor–network theory (ANT), this paper engages with political agency through the concept of performativity. Based on the empirical analysis of a hunger strike that took place in Brussels in 2012 and involved 23 illegal immigrants, we aim to achieve three things. First, we foreground physical bodies as political entities caught up in multiple modes of doing politics. Second, we show how such modes relate to one another, reinforcing citizenship, activism and party politics as specific performances of agency associated with liberal democracy. Finally, we argue that the Brussels hunger strike also challenges these performances by failing to meet certain expectations about what it is to be political/act politically. As the European refugee crisis is generating louder and louder voices, hunger strikes sensitise us to modes of doing that work by becoming passive, silent, weak and vulnerable. Such processes, we suggest, expand the standard repertoire of modes of doing and may refigure our understanding of the interaction between transnational and liberal democratic politics—in International Relations, ANT and beyond.

Keywords

Actor–network theory Brussels Hunger strike Modes of doing Performativity Refugee crisis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Earlier versions of this paper were presented at various workshops and conferences in Amsterdam, Frankfurt, London (CRESC), Torun (EASST) and Trier (DGS). We are grateful to the organisers and the participants of those events, as well as Benjamin Braun, Sebastian Schindler and Tobias Wille, the editors of this special issue, and three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions. Special thanks to Rita Vanobberghen for her generous help throughout our research.

References

  1. Abrahamsson, Sebastian. 2014. An Actor Network Analysis of Constipation and Agency: Shit Happens. Subjectivity 7 (2): 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrahamsson, Sebastian, Filippo Bertoni, Annemarie Mol, and Rebeca Ibáñez Martín. 2015. Living with Omega-3: New Materialism and Enduring Concerns. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33 (1): 4–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akrich, Madeleine, and Bruno Latour. 1992. A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies. In Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, ed. Wiebe Bijker, and John Law, 259–264. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Anon. 2012. VUB-hongerstaker naait mond dicht [VUB Hunger striker sews his mouth], Het Laatste Nieuws, 11 March: 16.Google Scholar
  5. Anon. 2015. Maggie De Block nu ook populairste in Wallonie en Brussel [‘Maggie De Block is now the most popular in Wallonie and Brussels’], De Standaard, 2 February. http://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20150202_01506279. Accessed 29 Jul 2017.
  6. Austin, John. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bargu, Banu. 2014a. Odysseus Unbound: Sovereignty and Sacrifice in Hunger and the Dialectic of Enlightenment. Angelaki 19 (4): 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bargu, Banu. 2014b. Starve and Immolate. New York & Chichester: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barry, Andrew. 2013. The Translation Zone: Between Actor-Network Theory and International Relations. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 41 (3): 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berlant, Lauren. 2007. Slow Death (Sovereignty, Obesity, Lateral Agency). Critical Inquiry 33 (4): 754–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Braun, Benjamin, Sebastian, Schindler, and Tobias, Wille. 2018. Rethinking Agency in International Relations: Performativity, Performances, and Actor-Networks. Journal of International Relations and Development [this issue].Google Scholar
  13. Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies That Matter. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Butler, Judith. 2010. Performative Agency. Journal of Cultural Economy 3 (2): 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Butler, Judith. 2015. Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Butler, Judith. 2016. Rethinking Vulnerability in Resistance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Callon, Michel. 1986. Some elements in the sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In Power, Action, and Belief, John Law, ed. 67–83. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  19. Callon, Michel. 1998. Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Callon, Michel. 2010. Performativity, Misfires and Politics. Journal of Cultural Economy 3 (2): 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Callon, Michel, and Bruno, Latour. 1981. Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors Macrostructure Reality and How Sociologists Help Them to Do so. In Advances in social theory and methodology: toward an integration of micro-and macro-sociologies, Karin, Knorr-Cetina and Aaron, Cicourel, eds. 277–303, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  22. Callon, Michel, Yuval Millo, and Fabian Muniesa. 2007. Market Devices. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Cochoy, Franck, Martin Giraudeau, and Liz McFall. 2010. Performativity, Economics and Politics: An Overview. Journal of Cultural Economy 3 (2): 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Coole, Diana, and Samantha Frost. 2010. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dányi, Endre. 2017. Walking as knowing and interfering, Aggregate, 12 June. http://we-aggregate.org/piece/walking-as-knowing-and-interfering. Accessed 13 Oct 2017.
  26. Dányi, Endre. 2018. Politics Beyond Words: An Ethnography of Political Institutions. In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, ed. Ruth Wodak, and Bernhard Forchtner, 291–305. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. de Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. de Genova, Nicholas. 2017. The Borders of ‘Europe’: Anatomy of Migration. Tactics of Bordering, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Delepeleire, Yves. 2012a. Hongerstaking sans-papiers loopt uit de hand [‘Hunger strike with undocumented immigrants goes out of control’], De Standard, 11 March: 17.Google Scholar
  30. Delepeleire, Yves. 2012b. Hongerstaker tekent eigen doodvonnis [Hunger striker signs his own death sentence’], De Standard, 29 March: 4.Google Scholar
  31. du Gay, Paul. 2010. Performativities: Butler, Callon and the moment of theory. Journal of Cultural Economy 3 (2): 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Edkins, Jenny., and V. Pin-Fat. 2005. Through the wire: Relations of power and relations of violence. MillenniumJournal of International Studies 34 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Edkins, Jenny, V. Pin-Fat, and M.J. Shapiro. 2004. Sovereign lives: power in global politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. El-Khairy, Omar. A. 2010. ‘Snowflakes on a Scarred Knuckle: The Biopolitics of the “War on Terror” through Steve McQueen’s Hunger and Kathryn Bigelow’s The Hurt Locker’, MillenniumJournal of International Studies 39 (1): 187–91.Google Scholar
  35. Fierke, Karin. M. 2013. Political Self-Sacrifice: Agency, Body and Emotion in International Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Gambino, Lauren. 2015. “No human being is illegal”: linguists argue against mislabelling of immigrants. Guardian, 6 December.Google Scholar
  37. Groebner, Valentin. 2007. Who Are You? Identifications, Deception and Surveillance in Early Modern Europe. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  38. Halberstam, Judith. 2011. The Queer Art of Failure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hennion, Antoine. 2007. Music Lovers: Taste as Performance. Theory, Culture & Society 18 (5): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hennion, Antoine and S. Thiéry. 2016. Réinventer Calais’ [‘Reinventing Calais’]. https://reinventercalais.org/. Accessed 30 June 2017.
  41. Latour, Bruno. 2004. How to Talk About the Body? The Normative Dimension of Science Studies. Body & Society 10 (2–3): 205–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Law, John. 1986. On the Methods of Long-Distance Control: Vessels, Navigation and the Portuguese Route to India. In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, John Law, ed. 234–263, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  43. Law, John. 1994. Organizing Modernity. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  44. Law, John. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. New york: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Law, John. 2008. Actor-Network Theory and Material Semiotics. In The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, ed. Brian S. Turner, 141–158. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  46. Law, John, Geir Afdal, Kristin Asdal, Wen-yuan Lin, Ingunn Moser, and Vicky Singleton. 2014. Modes of Syncretism: Notes on Noncoherence. Common Knowledge 20 (1): 172–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. M‘charek, Amade. forthcoming. “Dead-bodies-at-the-border”: Distributed Evidence and Emerging Forensic Infrastructure for Identification. In Bodies of Evidence: Anthropological Studies of Security, Knowledge and Power, M. Maguire, U. Rao, and N. Zurawski, eds, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  48. M’charek, Amade. 2016. On the frontline: vulnerable borders – thinking “the Arab Spring” and the European border management together. http://discoversociety.org/2016/02/02/on-the-frontline-vulnerable-borders-thinking-the-arab-spring-and-the-european-border-management-together/ Accessed 31 August 2016.
  49. MacKenzie, Donald, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu. 2007. Do Economists Make Markets?. On the Performativity of Economics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Marres, Noortje. 2012. Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Meijer, Irene Costera, and Baukje, Prins. 1998. How Bodies Come to Matter: An Interview with Judith Butler. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 23(2): 275–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mol, Annemarie. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mol, Annemarie, Ingunn Moser, and Jeannette. Pols. 2010. Care in Practice. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  55. Pahk, Sang-Hyoun. 2017. Misappropriation as Market Making: Butler, Callon, and Street Food in San Francisco, California. Journal of Cultural Economy 10 (3): 296–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Peeters, Steven. 2012. De Block heeft geen begrijp voor hongerstakers [‘De Block has no understanding for hunger strikers’]. http://www.hln.be/hln/nl/957/binnenland/article/detail/1415762/2012/03/29/De-Block-heeft-geen-begrijp-voor-hongerstakers.dhtml. Accessed 10 Aug 2016.
  57. Pool, Robert. 2004. “You’re Not Going to Dehydrate Mom, Are You?”: Euthanasia, Versterving, and Good Death in the Netherlands. Social Science and Medicine 58: 955–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Purnell, Kandida. 2015. Body Politics and Boundary Work: Nobodies on Hunger Strike at Guantánamo (2013–2015). Alternatives: Global Local, Political 39 (4): 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vandekerckhove, Sara. 2012. Europa was mijn beste kans op een gelukkig leven [Europe was my best chance to have a happy life]. De Morgen, 31 March, 10.Google Scholar
  60. Wilcox, Lauren. 2012. What the Body Does: Theorizing Hunger Striking and Embodied Agency in International Relations. In Paper Presented at the Millennium Conference on Materialism, 19–20 October, 2015.Google Scholar
  61. Wilcox, Lauren. 2014. Making Bodies Matter in IR. Millennium – Journal of International Studies 43 (1): 359–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilcox, Lauren. 2015. Bodies of Violence: Theorizing Embodied Subjects in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wilcox, Lauren. 2017. Practising Gender, Queering Theory. Review of International Studies 78: 1–20.Google Scholar
  64. Woussen, Wouter. 2012. Ze gebruiken ons als afschrikkend voorbeeld [They use us as a discouraging example‘], De Standard, 27 April, 6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EthnologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Department of SociologyGoethe UniversityFrankfurt Am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations