Advertisement

Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 50, Issue 9, pp 1636–1643 | Cite as

Impacting practice through IB scholarship: Toy recalls and the product safety crisis

  • Hari BapujiEmail author
  • Paul W Beamish
Research Note

Abstract

IB research has made significant contributions in understanding MNEs, yet examples of scholarship that have had a demonstrable impact on practice and policy are rare. This article presents research we conducted in the wake of the 2007 global product safety crisis as one such example. We reflect on it to suggest that IB research can enhance its impact by focusing attention on issues that affect both MNEs and societies, and by using available data to arrive at even basic explanations and solutions to inform practice and prompt further academic research.

Keywords

business and society/business in society China global supply chain strategies and risks international business research agenda product recalls research impact rigor and relevance 

Résumé

La recherche en international business (IB) a contribué de manière significative à la compréhension des EMN, mais les exemples de travaux académiques ayant eu un impact démontrable sur la pratique et la politique stratégique sont rares. Cet article présente les recherches que nous avons menées à la suite de la crise mondiale concernant la sécurité des produits de 2007, crise prise comme un exemple. Nous y réfléchissons pour suggérer que la recherche en IB peut renforcer son impact en attirant l’attention sur des problèmes qui affectent à la fois les EMN et les sociétés, et en utilisant les données disponibles pour trouver des explications et des solutions même fondamentales afin d’éclairer la pratique et de stimuler la recherche académique future.

Resumen

La investigación en Negocios Internacionales ha hecho contribuciones significativas al entendimiento de las EMN, pero son escasos los ejemplos de trabajos académicos que hayan tenido un impacto demostrable en la práctica y la política. Este artículo presenta la investigación que llevamos a cabo a raíz de la crisis global de seguridad de productos del 2007 como un ejemplo de esto. Reflexionamos sobre esto y sugerimos que la investigación en Negocios Internacionales puede mejorar su impacto focalizando su atención en asuntos que afectan tanto las EMN como a las sociedades, y usando datos disponibles para llegar explicaciones básicas y soluciones para informar la práctica e impulsar la investigación.

Resumo

A pesquisa em IB fez contribuições significativas para a compreensão de MNEs, no entanto, exemplos de pesquisas que tiveram um impacto demonstrável na prática e política são raros. Este artigo apresenta a pesquisa que conduzimos após a crise global de segurança de produtos de 2007 como um exemplo. Refletimos sobre isso para sugerir que a pesquisa em IB pode aumentar o seu impacto focando sua atenção em questões que afetam tanto MNEs quanto sociedades, e usando dados disponíveis para chegar mesmo a explicações e soluções básicas para informar à prática e estimular pesquisas acadêmicas adicionais.

摘要

国际商务研究在了解跨国公司方面做出了重大贡献,但对实践和政策产生明显影响的研究的实例却很少见。本文介绍了我们在2007年全球产品安全危机之后进行的研究就是一个这样的例子。我们反思该例子以表明,国际商务研究可以通过关注影响跨国公司和社会的问题,并利用现有的数据得出甚至是基本的解释及解决方案以指导实践并促进更进一步的学术研究,来增强其影响力。

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank the editor and three anonymous reviewers for improving this paper with their insightful comments. Numerous others, particularly a number of managers, regulators, and academic colleagues, played an important role in this research by freely and generously offering their time and expertise. Our sincere thanks to them.

Supplementary material

41267_2019_247_MOESM1_ESM.doc (120 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 120 kb)

REFERENCES

  1. Abell, P., Felin, T., & Foss, N. 2008. Building micro-foundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29(6): 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguinis, H., Shapiro, D., Antonacopoulou, E., & Cummings, T. 2014. Scholarly impact: A pluralist conceptualization. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(4): 623–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bapuji, H. 2011. Not just China: The rise of recalls in the age of global business. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bapuji, H., & Beamish, P. 2007. Toy recalls: Is China really the problem? Canada-Asia Commentary. September.Google Scholar
  5. Bapuji, H., & Beamish, P. 2008a. Mattel and the toy recalls. Case A. Ivey Publishing. 9B08M010.Google Scholar
  6. Bapuji, H., & Beamish, P. 2008b. Mattel and the toy recalls. Case B. Ivey Publishing. 9B08M011.Google Scholar
  7. Bapuji H., & Beamish P. 2008c. Product recalls: Avoid hazardous design flaws. Harvard Business Review, 86(3): 23–26.Google Scholar
  8. Bapuji, H., Beamish P., & Laplume A. 2007. Toy import and recall levels: Is there a connection? Research Reports. November 478–479.Google Scholar
  9. Bapuji, H., & Morris, K. 2011. Consumer product safety in Canada: From enacting to acting. Policy Options, 32(4): 48–50.Google Scholar
  10. Barboza D., & Story L. 2007. Toymaking in China, Mattel’s way. New York Times. July 26Google Scholar
  11. Beamish, P., & Bapuji, H. 2008. Toy recalls and China: Emotion vs. evidence. Management and Organization Review, 4(2): 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beamish, P., & Webb, W. 1988. Note on international licensing. Ivey Publishing. 9A88G001.Google Scholar
  13. Bilkey, W. J., & Nes, E. 1982. Country-of-origin effects on product evaluations. Journal of International Business Studies, 13(1): 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buckley, P. J. 2002. Is the international business research agenda running out of steam? Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2): 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buckley, P. J., Doh, J. P., & Benischke, M. H. 2017. Towards a renaissance in international business research? Big questions, grand challenges, and the future of IB scholarship. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(9): 908–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carvalho, S., Muralidharan, E., & Bapuji, H. 2015. Corporate social ‘irresponsibility’: Are consumers’ biases in attribution of blame helping companies in product-harm crises involving hybrid products? Journal of Business Ethics, 130(3): 651–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Contractor, F. J. 2017. Global leadership in an era of growing nationalism, protectionism, and anti-globalization. Rutgers Business Review,2(2), 163–185.Google Scholar
  18. Doh, J. 2017. Phenomenon-based research in international business: Making IB relevant again. AIB Insights, 17(2): 14–16.Google Scholar
  19. Dunning, J. H. 1998. Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. 2000. The determinants of trust in supplier–automaker relationships in the US, Japan and Korea. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2): 259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hora, M., Bapuji, H., & Roth, A. 2011. Safety hazard and time to recall: The role of recall strategy, product defect type, and supply chain player in the U.S. toy industry. Journal of Operations Management, 7–8: 766–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kieser, A., Nicolai, A., & Seidl, D. 2015. The practical relevance of management research: Turning the debate on relevance into a rigorous scientific research program. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1): 143–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4): 625–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kolk, A. 2016. The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business, 51(1): 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liesch, P. W., Hakanson, L., McGaughey, S. L., Middleton, S., & Cretchley, J. 2011. The evolution of the international business field: A scientometric investigation of articles published in its premier journal. Scientometrics, 88(1): 17–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Muralidharan, E., Bapuji, H., & Hora, M. 2019. The more I err, the less I pay: Effect of firm recall experience, firm type, and recall severity on remedy to consumers. European Journal of Marketing, 53(5): 916–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peng, M. W., & Chen, H. 2011. Strategic responses to domestic and foreign institutional pressures: The case of the Chinese toy industry. International Studies of Management & Organization,41(2), 88–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peng, M. W., Li Sun, S., & Blevins, D. 2011. The social responsibility of international business scholars. Multinational Business Review, 19(2): 106–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Seno-Alday, S. 2010. International business thought: A 50-year footprint. Journal of International Management, 16(1): 16–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shapiro, D. L., Kirkman, B. L., & Courtney, H. G. 2007. Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problem in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2): 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Story L. 2007. Mattel Official Apologizes in China. The New York Times. September 21.Google Scholar
  32. Teagarden, M. 2009. Learning from toys: Reflections on the 2007 recall crisis. Thunderbird International Business Review, 51(1): 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Verbeke, A., & Calma, A. 2017. Footnotes on JIBS 1970–2016. Journal of International Business Studies, 48: 1037–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business and EconomicsThe University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  2. 2.Ivey Business SchoolWestern UniversityLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations