Advertisement

Corporate internationalization, subsidiary locations, and the cost of equity capital

  • Atanas MihovEmail author
  • Andy Naranjo
Article

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between corporate internationalization and the cost of equity capital. We find that international diversification reduces the cost of equity. The diversification benefits are particularly strong during the 2008 financial crisis and for financially constrained firms. We also find that market-specific factors serve as important channels through which the corporate internationalization effects amplify or attenuate. Overall, our study provides support for theories that multinational companies perform valuable diversification functions to investors in a world with segmented and imperfect financial markets.

Keywords

corporate internationalization cost of equity capital financial constraints subsidiary locations 

Résumé

Cette étude examine la relation entre l'internationalisation des entreprises et le coût des fonds propres. Nous constatons que la diversification internationale réduit le coût des capitaux propres. Les avantages de la diversification sont particulièrement importants pendant la crise financière de 2008 et pour les entreprises ayant des contraintes financières. Nous constatons également que les facteurs spécifiques au marché constituent des canaux importants par lesquels les effets d’internationalisation des entreprises s’amplifient ou s’atténuent. Dans l’ensemble, notre étude appuie les théories selon lesquelles les entreprises multinationales (EMN) remplissent des fonctions de diversification intéressantes pour les investisseurs dans un monde caractérisé par des marchés financiers segmentés et imparfaits.

Resumen

Este estudio examina la relación entre la internacionalización corporativa y el costo de capital propio. Encontramos que la diversificación internacional reduce el costo de capital propio. Los beneficios de la diversificación son particularmente fuertes durante la crisis financiera del 2008 y para las empresas financieramente limitadas. Encontramos también que los factores específicos de mercado sirven como canales importantes a través de los cuales los efectos de la internacionalización corporativa se amplifican o se atenúan. En general, nuestro estudio proporciona apoyo para las teorías que las empresas multinacionales (EMN) realizan funciones valiosas de diversificación para los inversionistas en un mundo con mercados financieros segmentados e imperfectos.

Resumo

Este estudo examina a relação entre a internacionalização corporativa e o custo do capital próprio. Descobrimos que a diversificação internacional reduz o custo do capital próprio. Os benefícios da diversificação são particularmente fortes durante a crise financeira de 2008 e para empresas financeiramente limitadas. Nós também concluímos que fatores específicos do mercado servem como canais importantes através dos quais os efeitos da internacionalização corporativa amplificam-se ou atenuam-se. No geral, nosso estudo fornece suporte para teorias de que empresas multinacionais (MNCs) realizam funções de diversificação valiosas para investidores em um mundo com mercados financeiros segmentados e imperfeitos.

摘要

本研究考察了企业国际化与股权资本成本之间的关系。我们发现, 国际多元化降低股权成本。在2008年金融危机期间以及对财务紧张的公司而言, 多元化收益尤为强劲。我们还发现, 市场特定因素是企业国际化影响放大或缩小的重要渠道。总体上讲, 我们的研究为跨国公司(MNCs)在分割的和不完善的金融市场的世界中为投资者提供有价值的多元化功能提供了理论支持。

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Azamat Abdymomunov, Ray Brastow, Filippo Curti, Jeff Gerlach, Nada Mora, Leming Lin, Leandro Sanz, Jennifer Tucker, Pinar Uysal and Mihail Velikov for valuable comments and suggestions. Jeffrey Cheng provided able research assistance. All remaining errors are those of the authors alone. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond or the Federal Reserve System.

Supplementary material

41267_2018_207_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (392 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 391 KB)

References

  1. Abadie, A., Drukker, D., Herr, J. L., & Imbens, G. W. 2004. Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in Stata. The Stata Journal, 4(3): 290–311.Google Scholar
  2. Agmon, T., & Lessard, D. R. 1977. Investor recognition of corporate international diversification. The Journal of Finance, 32(4): 1049–1055.Google Scholar
  3. Ahern, K. R., Daminelli, D., & Fracassi, C. 2015. Lost in translation? The effect of cultural values on mergers around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1): 165–189.Google Scholar
  4. Amihud, Y., Bartov, E., & Wang, B. 2015. The pricing of corporate foreign sales risk. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  5. Bartov, E., Bodnar, G. M., & Kaul, A. 1996. Exchange rate variability and the riskiness of U.S. multinational firms: Evidence from the breakdown of the Bretton Woods system. Journal of Financial Economics, 42(1): 105–132.Google Scholar
  6. Bartram, S. M., Brown, G., & Stulz, R. M. 2012. Why are U.S. stocks more volatile? The Journal of Finance, 67(4): 1329–1370.Google Scholar
  7. Bekaert, G., & Harvey, C. R. 2000. Foreign speculators and emerging equity markets. The Journal of Finance, 55(2): 565–613.Google Scholar
  8. Berger, A. N., Ghoul, S. E., Guedhami, O., & Roman, R. A. 2017. Internationalization and bank risk. Management Science, 63(7): 2283–2301.Google Scholar
  9. Berry, H., Guillén, M. F., & Zhou, N. 2010. An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9): 1460–1480.Google Scholar
  10. Beugelsdijk, S., Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2017. An overview of Hofstede-inspired country-level culture research in international business since 2006. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(1): 30–47.Google Scholar
  11. Black, D. E., Dikolli, S. S., & Dyreng, S. D. 2014. CEO pay-for-complexity and the risk of managerial diversion from multinational diversification. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(1): 103–135.Google Scholar
  12. Brewer, H. L. 1981. Investor benefits from corporate international diversification. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 16(1): 113–126.Google Scholar
  13. Brouthers, L. E., Marshall, V. B., & Keig, D. L. 2016. Solving the single-country sample problem in cultural distance studies. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(4): 471–479.Google Scholar
  14. Burgman, T. A. 1996. An empirical examination of multinational corporate capital structure. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(3): 553–570.Google Scholar
  15. Campa, J. M., & Kedia, S. 2002. Explaining the diversification discount. The Journal of Finance, 57(4): 1731–1762.Google Scholar
  16. Caves, R. E. 1971. International corporations: The industrial economics of foreign investment. Economica, 38(149): 1–27.Google Scholar
  17. Chen, K. C. W., Chen, Z., & Wei, K. C. J. 2011. Agency costs of free cash flow and the effect of shareholder rights on the implied cost of equity capital. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(1): 171–207.Google Scholar
  18. Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Maloney, M. M., & Manrakhan, S. 2007. Causes of the difficulties in internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5): 709–725.Google Scholar
  19. Dastidar, P. 2009. International corporate diversification and performance: Does firm self-selection matter? Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1): 71–85.Google Scholar
  20. Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Yost, K. 2002. Global diversification, industrial diversification, and firm value. The Journal of Finance, 57(5): 1951–1979.Google Scholar
  21. Desai, M. A., Foley, C. F., & Hines, J. R. 2008. Capital structure with risky foreign investment. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3): 534–553.Google Scholar
  22. Dhaliwal, D., Judd, J. S., Serfling, M., & Shaikh, S. 2016. Customer concentration risk and the cost of equity capital. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1): 23–48.Google Scholar
  23. Duchin, R. 2010. Cash holdings and corporate diversification. The Journal of Finance, 65(3): 955–992.Google Scholar
  24. Dyreng, S. D., & Lindsey, B. P. 2009. Using financial accounting data to examine the effect of foreign operations located in tax havens and other countries on U.S. multinational firms’ tax rates. Journal of Accounting Research, 47(5): 1283–1316.Google Scholar
  25. Dyreng, S. D., Lindsey, B. P., & Thornock, J. R. 2013. Exploring the role delaware plays as a domestic tax haven. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(3): 751–772.Google Scholar
  26. Elton, E. J. 1999. Presidential address: Expected return, realized return, and asset pricing tests. The Journal of Finance, 54(4): 1199–1220.Google Scholar
  27. Errunza, V., Hogan, K., & Hung, M. 1999. Can the gains from international diversification be achieved without trading abroad? The Journal of Finance, 54(6): 2075–2107.Google Scholar
  28. Errunza, V. R., & Miller, D. P. 2000. Market segmentation and the cost of capital in international equity markets. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35(4): 577–600.Google Scholar
  29. Errunza, V. R., & Senbet, L. W. 1981. The effects of international operations on the market value of the firm: Theory and evidence. The Journal of Finance, 36(2): 401–417.Google Scholar
  30. Errunza, V. R., & Senbet, L. W. 1984. International corporate diversification, market valuation, and size-adjusted evidence. The Journal of Finance, 39(3): 727–743.Google Scholar
  31. Fatemi, A. M. 1984. Shareholder benefits from corporate international diversification. The Journal of Finance, 39(5): 1325–1344.Google Scholar
  32. Fauver, L., Houston, J., & Naranjo, A. 2003. Capital market development, international integration, legal systems, and the value of corporate diversification: A cross-country analysis. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1): 135–157.Google Scholar
  33. Fu, F. 2009. Idiosyncratic risk and the cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 91(1): 24–37.Google Scholar
  34. Gande, A., Schenzler, C., & Senbet, L. W. 2009. Valuation effects of global diversification. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1515–1532.Google Scholar
  35. Giannetti, M., & Yafeh, Y. 2012. Do cultural differences between contracting parties matter? Evidence from syndicated bank loans. Management Science, 58(2): 365–383.Google Scholar
  36. Grinblatt, M., & Keloharju, M. 2001. How distance, language, and culture influence stockholdings and trades. The Journal of Finance, 56(3): 1053–1073.Google Scholar
  37. Hadlock, C. J., & Pierce, J. R. 2010. New evidence on measuring financial constraints: Moving beyond the KZ index. Review of Financial Studies, 23(5): 1909–1940.Google Scholar
  38. Hann, R. N., Ogneva, M., & Ozbas, O. 2013. Corporate diversification and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance, 68(5): 1961–1999.Google Scholar
  39. Heckman, J. J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1): 153–161.Google Scholar
  40. Henry, P. B. 2000. Stock market liberalization, economic reform, and emerging market equity prices. The Journal of Finance, 55(2): 529–564.Google Scholar
  41. Hope, O.-K., Kang, T., Thomas, W. B., & Vasvari, F. 2009. The effects of SFAS 131 geographic segment disclosures by US multinational companies on the valuation of foreign earnings. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(3): 421–443.Google Scholar
  42. Hughes, J. S., Logue, D. E., & Sweeney, R. J. 1975. Corporate international diversification and market assigned measures of risk and diversification. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 10(4): 627–637.Google Scholar
  43. Jang, Y. 2017. International corporate diversification and financial flexibility. The Review of Financial Studies, 30(12): 4133–4178.Google Scholar
  44. Karolyi, G. A., & Stulz, R. M. 2003. Are financial assets priced locally or globally? In G. M. Constantinides, M. Harris, & R. M. Stulz (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of finance, financial markets and asset pricing (pp. 975–1020). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  45. Kaufman, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. 2009. Governance matters VIII—Aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996–2008. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  46. Kogut, B., & Singh, H. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3): 411–432.Google Scholar
  47. Kuppuswamy, V., & Villalonga, B. 2016. Does diversification create value in the presence of external financing constraints? Evidence from the 2007–2009 financial crisis. Management Science, 62(4): 905–923.Google Scholar
  48. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6): 1113–1155.Google Scholar
  49. Lewellen, W. G. 1971. A pure financial rationale for the conglomerate merger. The Journal of Finance, 26(2): 521–537.Google Scholar
  50. Lewis, K. K. 2011. Global asset pricing. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 3: 435–466.Google Scholar
  51. Li, J., & Guisinger, S. 1991. Comparative business failures of foreign-controlled firms in the United States. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(2): 209–224.Google Scholar
  52. Li, J., & Guisinger, S. 1992. The globalization of service multinationals in the “triad” regions: Japan, Western Europe and North America. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4): 675–696.Google Scholar
  53. Lin, L., Mihov, A., Sanz, L., & Stoyanova, D. 2018. Property rights institutions, foreign investment, and the valuation of U.S. MNCs. Journal of Financial Economics, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  54. Lintner, J. 1965. The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1): 13–37.Google Scholar
  55. Livdan, D., Sapriza, H., & Zhang, L. 2009. Financially constrained stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 64(4): 1827–1862.Google Scholar
  56. Manova, K., Wei, S.-J., & Zhang, Z. 2015. Firm exports and multinational activity under credit constraints. Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(3): 574–588.Google Scholar
  57. Morck, R., & Yeung, B. 1991. Why investors value multinationality. The Journal of Business, 64(2): 165–187.Google Scholar
  58. Ohlson, J. A., & Juettner-Nauroth, B. E. 2005. Expected EPS and EPS growth as determinants of value. Review of Accounting Studies, 10(2–3): 349–365.Google Scholar
  59. Pastor, L., & Veronesi, P. 2013. Political uncertainty and risk premia. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(3): 520–545.Google Scholar
  60. Ragazzi, G. 1973. Theories of the determinants of direct foreign investment. Staff Papers (International Monetary Fund), 20(2): 471–498.Google Scholar
  61. Rauh, J. D. 2006. Investment and financing constraints: Evidence from the funding of corporate pension plans. The Journal of Finance, 61(1): 33–71.Google Scholar
  62. Reeb, D. M., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Baek, H. Y. 1998. Systematic risk of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(2): 263–279.Google Scholar
  63. Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. 2013. Mapping world cultures: Cluster formation, sources and implications. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(9): 867–897.Google Scholar
  64. Schmid, M. M., & Walter, I. 2012. Geographic diversification and firm value in the financial services industry. Journal of Empirical Finance, 19(1): 109–122.Google Scholar
  65. Sharpe, W. F. 1964. Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3): 425–442.Google Scholar
  66. Shenkar, O. 2001. Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3): 519–535.Google Scholar
  67. Stulz, R. M., & Williamson, R. 2003. Culture, openness, and finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 70(3): 313–349.Google Scholar
  68. Villalonga, B. 2004. Diversification discount or premium? New evidence from the business information tracking series. The Journal of Finance, 59(2): 479–506.Google Scholar
  69. Yan, A. 2006. Value of conglomerates and capital market conditions. Financial Management, 35(4): 5–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Quantitative Supervision and ResearchFederal Reserve Bank of RichmondCharlotteUSA
  2. 2.Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate DepartmentUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations