The effects of cultural tightness and perceived unfairness on Japanese consumers’ attitude towards insurance fraud: the mediating effect of rationalization

  • Haithem ZourrigEmail author
  • Jeongsoo Park
Original Article


The paper examines the effects of cultural tightness, rationalization, and perceived unfairness on Japanese consumers’ attitude towards insurance fraud. The results show a positive effect of perceived inequity/unfairness on acceptance of fraud and a partial mediation of rationalization on insurance fraud acceptance, whereas cultural tightness was found to weigh against the acceptance of fraud. This would suggest that, while the perception of being unfairly treated by an insurance company and reframing a fraudulent behaviour as non-condemnable conduct contribute to fraud acceptance, the strength of social norms and the degree of sanctioning would reduce fraud tolerance. From a managerial perspective, global insurance companies would take advantage from understanding the role of cultural tightness in fighting against fraud. Furthermore, the use of counter-neutralization techniques would be helpful to reduce the effect of rationalization on public tolerance for insurance fraud.


Cultural tightness Rationalization Counter-neutralization Insurance fraud 



The authors acknowledge the financial support of Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)-Insight Development grant to this research.


  1. Adams, J.S. 1965. Inequity in Social Exchange. In Advances Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 2, ed. L. Berkowitz, 267–299. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A., C. Barbaranelli, G.V. Caprara, and C. Pastorelli. 1996. Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 364–374.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, R.M., and D.A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6): 1173.Google Scholar
  4. Brinkmann, J. 2005. Understanding Insurance Customer Dishonesty: Situational Approach. Journal of Business Ethics 61: 183–197.Google Scholar
  5. Brinkmann, J., and P. Lentz. 2006. Understanding Insurance Customer Outline of a Moral-Sociological Approach. Journal of Business Ethics 66: 177–195.Google Scholar
  6. Brislin, R.W. 1970. Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1(3): 185–216.Google Scholar
  7. Chan, D.K.S. 1996. Tightness-Looseness Revisited: Some Preliminary Analyses in Japan and the United States. International Journal of Psychology 31(1): 1–12.Google Scholar
  8. Chicago Tribune. 2008. Shoplifting Wave Points to Plight of Elderly Japanese. Accessed 23 Jan 2019.
  9. Chin, W.W. 1998. The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. In Modern Methods for Business Research, ed. G.A. Marcoulides, 295–336. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahway.Google Scholar
  10. Choi, T.H. 2008. The Evolution of Business Ethics in Japan and Korea Over the Last Decade. Human Systems Management 27(3): 183–199.Google Scholar
  11. Colquitt, L. L., and Hoyt, R. E. 1997. An empirical analysis of the nature and cost of fraudulent life insurance claims. Journal of Insurance Regulation 15(4): 451.Google Scholar
  12. Copes, H., and J.P. Williams. 2007. Techniques of Affirmation: Deviant Behavior, Moral Commitment, and Subcultural Identity. Deviant Behavior 28(3): 247–272.Google Scholar
  13. Costonis, M., and J. Bramblet. 2010. Improve Customer Service and Fraud Detection to Deliver High Performance Through Claims: Insurance Fraud Survey 2010. Accessed 9 May 2012.Google Scholar
  14. Dean, D.H. 2004. Perceptions of Ethicality of Consumer Claim Fraud. Journal of Business Ethics 54(1): 67–79.Google Scholar
  15. Deloitte-Japan. 2018. Japan Fraud Survey 2018–2020. Accessed 23 Jan 2019.
  16. Erffmeyer, R.C., B.D. Keillor, and D.T. LeClair. 1999. An empirical Investigation of Japanese Consumer Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 18(1): 35–50.Google Scholar
  17. Farashah, A.D., and H. Estelami. 2014. The Interplay of External Punishment and Internal Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Insurance Fraud. Journal of Financial Services Marketing 19(4): 253–264.Google Scholar
  18. Festinger, L. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fornell, C., and D.F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1): 39–50.Google Scholar
  20. Gelfand, M.J. 2012. Culture’s Constraints: International Differences in the Strength of Social Norms. Current Directions in Psychological Science 21(6): 420–424.Google Scholar
  21. Gelfand, M.J., J.L. Raver, L. Nishii, L.M. Leslie, J. Lun, B.C. Lim, and S. Yamaguchi. 2011. Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study. Science 332(6033): 1100–1104.Google Scholar
  22. Grief, A. 1994. Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies. Journal of Political Economy 102(5): 912–950.Google Scholar
  23. Gelfand, M.J., L.H. Nishii, and J.L. Raver. 2006. On the Nature and Importance of Cultural Tightness-Looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology 91(6): 1–57.Google Scholar
  24. Hair, J.F., C.M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2011. PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19(2): 139–152.Google Scholar
  25. Harman, H.H. 1976. Modern Factor Analysis. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Höck, M., and C.M. Ringle. 2006. Strategic Networks in the Software Industry: An Empirical Analysis of the Value Continuum. IFSAM VIIIth World Congress, Berlin 2006. Accessed 22 Feb 2009.
  27. Hofstede, G. 1980. Motivation, Leadership, and Organization: Do American Theories Apply Abroad? Organizational Dynamics 9(1): 42–63.Google Scholar
  28. Holton, D.C. 1946. Shintoism. In The Great Religions of the Modern World, 141–177.Google Scholar
  29. Iwao, S. 1993. The Japanese Woman. Traditional Image and Changing Reality. The Free Press, New York. xii, 304 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Japan Financial Intelligence Center (JAFIC). 2015. Annual Report. Accessed 27 Mar 2017.
  31. Japanese Census. 2010. Population by Sex and Age. Accessed 13 May 2014.
  32. Kidder, L.H. 1992. Requirements for Being “Japanese”: Stories of Returnees. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 16(4): 383–393.Google Scholar
  33. Lesch, W.C., and B. Byars. 2008. Consumer Insurance Fraud in the US Property-Casualty Industry. Journal of Financial Crime 15(4): 411–431.Google Scholar
  34. Lesch, W., and B. Baker. 2011. Unraveling the Rationale for Property-Casualty Insurance Fraud. Helsinki: In Workshop on the Economization of Uncertainty.Google Scholar
  35. Lesch, W.C., and B.R. Baker. 2013. Balancing the Insurance Equation: Understanding the Climate for Managing Consumer Insurance Fraud and Abuses. Journal of Insurance Issues 82–120.Google Scholar
  36. Lesch, W.C., and J. Brinkmann. 2011. Consumer Insurance Fraud/Abuse As Co-creation and Co-responsibility: A New Paradigm. Journal of Business Ethics 103(1): 17–32.Google Scholar
  37. Li, S., H.C. Triandis, and Y. Yu. 2006. Cultural Orientation and Corruption. Ethics and Behavior 16(3): 199–215.Google Scholar
  38. Lloyd Bierstaker, J. 2009. Differences in Attitudes About Fraud and Corruption Across Cultures: Theory, Examples and Recommendations. Cross-Cultural Management: An International Journal 16(3): 241–250.Google Scholar
  39. McFarlin, D.B., and P.D. Sweeney. 1992. Distributive and Procedural Justice as Predictors of Satisfaction with Personal and Organizational Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 35(3): 626–637.Google Scholar
  40. Miyazaki, A.D. 2009. Perceived Ethicality of Insurance Claim Fraud: Do Higher Deductibles Lead to Lower Ethical Standards? Journal of Business Ethics 87(4): 589–598.Google Scholar
  41. MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings. 2018. Sophistication of Insurance Claims Settlement Process Utilizing Technology of AI. Accessed 23 Jan 2019.
  42. Murphy, P.R., and M.T. Dacin. 2011. Psychological Pathways to Fraud: Understanding and Preventing Fraud in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 101(4): 601–618.Google Scholar
  43. Newman, M. 2016. Customer Product Research. Accessed 03 Dec 2009.
  44. Pollara. 2012. Ontarians’ Beliefs About Auto Insurance Fraud. Insurance Bureau of Canada Report. 1–43.Google Scholar
  45. Powers, M. 2014. Acts of God and Man: Ruminations on Risk and Insurance. New York City: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rawwas, M.Y., Z. Swaidan, and J. Al-Khatib. 2006. Does Religion Matter? A Comparison Study of the Ethical Beliefs of Marketing Students of Religious and Secular Universities in Japan. Journal of Business Ethics 65(1): 69–86.Google Scholar
  47. Sparkling Logic. 2013. Next-Generation Insurance Fraud Detection System Built on Sparkling Logic SMARTS. Accessed 20 May 2017.
  48. Taylor, J. 1983. Shadows of the Rising Sun: A Critical View of the “Japanese Miracle”. New York City: William Morrow.Google Scholar
  49. Tennyson, S. 1997. Economic Institutions and Individual Ethics: A Study of Consumer Attitudes Toward Insurance Fraud. Journal of Economic Behavior Organization 32(2): 247–265.Google Scholar
  50. Tennyson, S. 2011. Insurer Anti-fraud Programs: Contracts and Detection Versus Norms and Prevention. 10Year Anniversary, 151.Google Scholar
  51. Tennyson, S. 2002. Insurance Experience and Consumers’ Attitudes Toward Insurance Fraud. Journal of Insurance Regulation 21(2): 35.Google Scholar
  52. Tennyson, S. 2008. Moral, Social, and Economic Dimensions of Insurance Claims Fraud. Social Research 75: 1181–1204.Google Scholar
  53. The Japan Times. 2002. National False Auto Insurance Claims Rising. Accessed 19 Mar 2017.
  54. The General Insurance Association of Japan. 2016. Accessed 20 July 2017.
  55. Tian, K., and B. Keep. 2002. Customer Fraud and Business Responses: Let the Marketer Beware. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  56. Triandis, H.C. 2004. The Many Dimensions of Culture. The Academy of Management Executive 18(1): 88–93.Google Scholar
  57. Triandis, H.C., P. Carnevale, M. Gelfand, C. Robert, S.A. Wasti, T. Probst, and P. Schmitz. 2001. Culture and Deception in Business Negotiations. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management 1(1): 73–90.Google Scholar
  58. Triandis, H.C. 1989. The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts. Psychological Review 96(3): 506.Google Scholar
  59. Toa. 2013. Japan’s Insurance Market. The Toa Reinsurance Company limited. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.
  60. Tseng, L.M., and W.P. Su. 2013. Customer Orientation, Social Consensus and Insurance Salespeople’s Tolerance of Customer Insurance Frauds. International Journal of Bank Marketing 31(1): 38–55.Google Scholar
  61. Tseng, L.M., Y.M. Kang, and C.E. Chung. 2014. Understanding the Roles of Loss-Premium Comparisons and Insurance Coverage in Customer Acceptance of Insurance Claim Frauds. Journal of Financial Crime 21(3): 321–335.Google Scholar
  62. Tseng, L.M., and C.L. Kuo. 2014. Customers’ Attitudes Toward Insurance Frauds: An Application of Adams’ Equity Theory. International Journal of Social Economics 41(11): 1038–1054.Google Scholar
  63. Viaene, S., and G. Dedene. 2004. Insurance Fraud: Issues and Challenges. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice 29(2): 313–333.Google Scholar
  64. Washington Post. 2008. Elderly Shoplifters on the Rise in Japan. Accessed 23 Jan 2019.
  65. Weisberg, H.I., and R.A. Derrig. 1998. Quantitative Methods for Detecting Fraudulent Automobile Bodily Injury Claims. Risques 35: 75–101.Google Scholar
  66. Winsted, K.F. 1997. The Service Experience in Two Cultures: A Behavioral Perspective. Journal of Retailing 73(3): 337–360.Google Scholar
  67. Yamada, T. 2009. A Study of Insurance Fraud in Japan. Journal of Insurance Science 606: 191–209. Scholar
  68. Zhang, J., S.E. Beatty, and G. Walsh. 2008. Review and Future Directions of Cross-Cultural Consumer Services Research. Journal of Business Research 61(3): 211–224.Google Scholar
  69. Zourrig, H., J.C. Chebat, and R. Toffoli. 2009. Consumer Revenge Behavior: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Journal of Business Research 62(10): 995–1001.Google Scholar
  70. Zourrig, H., and J. Cosentino. 2017. Perceived Deceptiveness of Insurance Fraud: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. ASBBS Proceedings 24(1): 567.Google Scholar
  71. Zourrig, H., J. Park, K. El Hedhli, and M. Zhang. 2018. The Effect of Cultural Tightness–Looseness on Fraud Perception in Insurance Services. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences 10(2): 138–148.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kent State University at StarkNorth CantonUSA
  2. 2.Komazawa UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations