Advertisement

Journal of Brand Management

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 1–8 | Cite as

Researching CSR and brands in the here and now: an integrative perspective

  • Urša GolobEmail author
  • Klement Podnar
Editorial

Abstract

The inclusion of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in branding is becoming widespread both in research and practice. Companies engaging in CSR-related branding must adopt an integrative perspective on CSR branding by acting on CSR expectations and issues, considering CSR branding decisions and concentrating on relational brand elements and outcomes. The integrative perspective is illustrated in a model which serves as a framework for introducing the papers in this special issue. The papers address various topics in this model and bring up various relevant CSR branding considerations which should interest both researchers and managers in this area of study and practice.

Keywords

CSR Brands CSR expectations Engagement Value 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to express a thank you to all those who have contributed to this special issue of Journal of Brand Management (JBM). The reviewing was a double-blind process. We greatly appreciate the work of all the reviewers involved, who provided timely feedback to the authors: Guido Berens, Mario Burghausen, Craig Carroll, Sabine Einwiller, Wim Elving, Michael Etter, Francisca Farache, Matthes Fleck, Sarah Glozer, Maja Golf Papez, Maja Hosta, Laura Illia, Stefan Jarolimek, Mateja Kos Koklič, Anne Ellerup Nielsen, Ania Rynarzewska, Lokweetpun Suprawan, Neva Štumberger, Selin Turkel, Ana Tkalac Verčič, Hannah Trittin, Urška Tuškej Lovšin, Katja Udir Mišič, Ebru Uzunoglu, Nataša Verk and Candace White. We also extend our thanks to the editors, Tim Brexendorf, Joachim Kernstock and Shaun Powell, and to the Assistant Publishing Editor at Palgrave Journals, Kate Hall, for giving us the opportunity and support for guest editing this special issue of JBM. Finally, we thank all the authors who submitted manuscripts; over 30 papers were initially received. We trust that the selected papers will enhance the understanding in this area, provide a basis for good management decisions and stimulate new ideas for future research.

References

  1. Andersen, S.E., and A.E. Nielsen. 2014. Shared value, shared responsibility: A co-creation perspective on sustainability. In Enterprising initiatives in the experience economy: Transforming Social Worlds 5, ed. B.T. Knudsen, D.R. Christensen, and P. Blenker, 189–208. Abingdon, Oxon, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Balmer, J.M., S.M. Powell, and S.A. Greyser. 2011. Explicating ethical corporate marketing. Insights from the BP Deepwater Horizon catastrophe: The ethical brand that exploded and then imploded. Journal of Business Ethics 102(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
  3. Bertilsson, J. 2014. The slippery relationship between brand ethic and profit. Ephemera 14(1): 125–136.Google Scholar
  4. Bhattacharya, C.B., and S. Sen. 2003. Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of marketing 67(2): 76–88.Google Scholar
  5. Biswas, M.K., and D. Suar. 2016. Antecedents and consequences of employer branding. Journal of Business Ethics 136(1): 57–72.Google Scholar
  6. Brüggenwirth, B. 2006. The CSR brand positioning grid. In Management models for corporate social responsibility, ed. J. Jonker and M. de Witte, 140–146. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Brunner, C.B., and T. Langner. 2017. Communicating corporate social responsibility for brands. In Handbook of integrated CSR communication. CSR, sustainability, ethics & governance, ed. S. Diehl, M. Karmasin, B. Mueller, R. Terlutter, and F. Weder, 149–169. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Chahal, M. 2015. The top 100 companies for ‘brand purpose’. And why CSR is helping brands do well by doing good. Marketing Week. http://www.marketingweek.com/2015/10/13/the-top-100-companies-for-brand-purpose/. Accessed 17 August 2017.
  9. Cone Communications. 2017. 2017 Cone Communications CSR Study. http://www.conecomm.com/research-blog/2017-csr-study. Accessed 17 August 2017.
  10. Du, S., C.B. Bhattacharya, and S. Sen. 2007. Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing 24(3): 224–241.Google Scholar
  11. Currás-Pérez, R., E. Bigné-Alcañiz, and A. Alvarado-Herrera. 2009. The role of self-definitional principles in consumer identification with a socially responsible company. Journal of Business Ethics 89(4): 547–564.Google Scholar
  12. He, H., and Y. Li. 2011. CSR and service brand: The mediating effect of brand identification and moderating effect of service quality. Journal of Business Ethics 100(4): 673–688.Google Scholar
  13. Hoeffler, S., and K.L. Keller. 2002. Building brand equity through corporate societal marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 21(1): 78–89.Google Scholar
  14. Hughes, B. 2016. Why corporate social responsibility is essential for brand strategy. The Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brian-hughes/why-corporate-social-resp_b_9282246.html. Accessed 14 August 2017.
  15. Hur, W.M., H. Kim, and J. Woo. 2014. How CSR leads to corporate brand equity: Mediating mechanisms of corporate brand credibility and reputation. Journal of Business Ethics 125(1): 75–86.Google Scholar
  16. Johansen, T.S., and A.E. Nielsen. 2011. Strategic stakeholder dialogues: A discursive perspective on relationship building. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 16(3): 204–217.Google Scholar
  17. Kitchin, T. 2003. Corporate responsibility: A brand extension. Journal of Brand Management 10(4/5): 312–326.Google Scholar
  18. Lai, C.S., C.J. Chiu, C.F. Yang, and D.C. Pai. 2010. The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand performance: The mediating effect of industrial brand equity and corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics 95(3): 457–469.Google Scholar
  19. Lee, E.M., S.Y. Park, M.I. Rapert, and C.L. Newman. 2012. Does perceived consumer fit matter in corporate social responsibility issues? Journal of Business Research 65(11): 1558–1564.Google Scholar
  20. Lindgreen, A., Y. Xu, F. Maon, and J. Wilcock. 2012. Corporate social responsibility brand leadership: A multiple case study. European Journal of Marketing 46(7/8): 965–993.Google Scholar
  21. Marques-Mendes, A., and M.J. Santos. 2016. Strategic CSR: An integrative model for analysis. Social Responsibility Journal 12(2): 363–381.Google Scholar
  22. Matten, D., and J. Moon. 2005. A conceptual framework for understanding CSR. In Corporate social responsibility across Europe, ed. A. Habisch, J. Jonker, M. Wegner, and R. Schmidpeter, 335–356. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  23. McAlister, D.T., and L. Ferrell. 2002. The role of strategic philanthropy in marketing strategy. European Journal of Marketing 36(5/6): 689–708.Google Scholar
  24. Middlemiss, N. 2003. Authentic not cosmetic: CSR as brand enhancement. The Journal of Brand Management 10(4): 353–361.Google Scholar
  25. Moon, J., L. Murphy, and J.P. Gond. 2017. Historical Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility. In Corporate social responsibility: Strategy, communication, governance, ed. A. Rasche, M. Morsing, and J. Moon, 31–62. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Murphy, P.E., M. Öberseder, and G.R. Laczniak. 2013. Corporate societal responsibility in marketing: Normatively broadening the concept. AMS Review 3(2): 86–102.Google Scholar
  27. Palazzo, G., and K. Basu. 2007. The ethical backlash of corporate branding. Journal of Business Ethics 73(4): 333–346.Google Scholar
  28. Polonsky, M.J., and C. Jevons. 2006. Understanding issue complexity when building a socially responsible brand. European Business Review 18(5): 340–349.Google Scholar
  29. Raghavan, L. and R. Gunewardene. 2015. Branding and CSR go together. Business Standard. http://www.business-standard.com/article/management/branding-and-csr-go-together-115092000722_1.html. Accessed 14 August 2017.
  30. Rasche, A., M. Morsing, and J. Moon. 2017. The changing role of business in global society: CSR and beyond. In Corporate social responsibility: Strategy, communication, governance, ed. A. Rasche, M. Morsing, and J. Moon, 1–30. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Reputation Institute. 2016. 2016 GlobalCSRRepTrack®. http://www.reputationinstitute.com/2016-Global-CSR-RepTrak.aspx. Accessed 17 August 2017.
  32. Rivoli, P., and S. Waddock. 2011. “First they ignore you…”: The time-context dynamic and corporate responsibility. California Management Review 53(2): 87–104.Google Scholar
  33. Rowledge, R.L., S.R. Barton, and S.K. Brady. 1999. First ascents: Finding the way toward quality of life and work. In Mapping the journey: Case studies in strategy and action towards sustainable development, ed. L. Rowledge, R.S. Barton, and K.S. Brady, 73–100. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Schwartz, A. 2015. 3 ways brands can use corporate social responsibility principles to create better advertising. Fast Company. http://www.fastcompany.com/3044195/3-ways-brands-can-use-corporate-social-responsibility-principles-to-create-better-advertising. Accessed 14 August 2017.
  35. Smith, N.C., M.E. Drumwright, and M.C. Gentile. 2010a. The new marketing myopia. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 29(1): 4–11.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, N.C., G. Palazzo, and C.B. Bhattacharya. 2010b. Marketing’s consequences: Stakeholder marketing and supply chain corporate social responsibility issues. Business Ethics Quarterly 20(4): 617–641.Google Scholar
  37. Skudiene, V., and V. Auruskeviciene. 2012. The contribution of corporate social responsibility to internal employee motivation. Baltic Journal of Management 7(1): 49–67.Google Scholar
  38. Van Rekom, J., G. Berens, and M. Van Halderen. 2013. Corporate social responsibility: Playing to win, or playing not to lose? Doing good by increasing the social benefits of a company’s core activities. Journal of Brand Management 20(9): 800–814.Google Scholar
  39. Werther, W.B., and D. Chandler. 2005. Strategic corporate social responsibility as global brand insurance. Business Horizons 48(4): 317–324.Google Scholar
  40. Williams, J., and R. Aitken. 2011. The service-dominant logic of marketing and marketing ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 102(3): 439–454.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marketing Communication and Public Relations, Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations