Advertisement

Journal of Brand Management

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 49–59 | Cite as

Keeping it real: examining the influence of co-branding authenticity in cause-related marketing

  • Jasmina IlicicEmail author
  • Stacey M. Baxter
  • Alicia Kulczynski
Original Article
  • 97 Downloads

Abstract

We introduce co-branding authenticity (genuine and real) as a driver of consumer intentions to purchase cause-related products. We argue that celebrity social responsibility influences the perceived authenticity of triadic co-branding partnerships (celebrity, brand, and cause). Across three experiments, we demonstrate that celebrity social responsibility increases perceptions of co-branding authenticity, which, in turn, enhances purchase intentions of cause-related products. We demonstrate that co-branding authenticity is a stronger predictor of purchase intentions of cause-related products than co-branding fit. We also determine that the effect of co-branding authenticity on the purchase intention of cause-related products is influenced by consumer self-transcendence values. Consumers high in self-transcendence (i.e., concerned with the welfare of other people) possess greater intentions to purchase the cause-related product when the celebrity is perceived as socially responsible and the co-branding partnership is perceived as authentic. This research has important ramifications for brand managers in the selection of partners with which to form a triadic co-branding partnership for the purpose of enhancing corporate social responsibility.

Keywords

Celebrity responsibility Co-branding Authenticity Cause-related marketing Purchase 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Faculty of Business and Law, The University of Newcastle, Australia, for sponsoring this study.

References

  1. Aaker, D.A. 1996. Building strong brands. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alhouti, S., C.M. Johnson, and B.B. Holloway. 2016. Corporate social responsibility authenticity: Investigating its antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Business Research 69 (3): 1242–1249.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. 1983. Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Arnould, E.J., and L.L. Price. 2000. Authenticating acts and authoritative performances: Questing for self and community. In The why of consumption: Contemporary perspectives on consumer motives, ed. S. Ratneswar, D. Glenick, and C. Huffman, 140–163. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Babiak, K., B. Mills, S. Tainsky, and M. Juracich. 2012. An investigation into professional athlete philanthropy: Why charity is part of the game. Journal of Sports Management 26 (2): 159–176.Google Scholar
  6. Basil, D.Z., and P.M. Herr. 2006. Attitudinal balance and cause-related marketing: An empirical application of balance theory. Journal of Consumer Psychology 16: 391–403.Google Scholar
  7. Batra, R., and P. Homer. 2004. The situational impact of brand image beliefs. Journal of Consumer Psychology 14 (3): 318–330.Google Scholar
  8. Baxter, S.M., and J. Ilicic. 2014. Fit in celebrity-charity alliances: When perceived celanthropy benefits nonprofit organisations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 19: 200–208.Google Scholar
  9. Baxter, S.M., and J. Ilicic. 2015. Three’s company: Investigating cognitive and sentiment unit imbalance in co-branding partnerships. Journal of Brand Management 22 (4): 281–298.Google Scholar
  10. Becker-Olsen, K., B. Cudmore, and R. Hill. 2006. The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behaviour. Journal of Business Research 59 (1): 46–53.Google Scholar
  11. Bendix, R. 1992. Diverging paths in the scientific search for authenticity. Journal of Folklore Research 29 (2): 103–132.Google Scholar
  12. Bernstein, D. 2007. Rhetoric and reputation: Some thoughts on corporate dissonance. Management Decision 47 (4): 603–615.Google Scholar
  13. Beverland, M.B. 2005. Crafting brand authenticity: The case of luxury wine. Journal of Management Studies 42 (5): 1003–1030.Google Scholar
  14. Bigne, E., R. Curras-Pérez, and J. Aldas-Manzano. 2012. Dual nature of cause-brand fit: influence on corporate social responsibility consumer perception. European Journal of Marketing 46 (3/4): 575–594.Google Scholar
  15. Bronn, P.S., and A.B. Vrioni. 2001. Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: an overview. International Journal of Advertising 20 (2): 207–222.Google Scholar
  16. Brown, S., R.V. Kozinets, and J.F. Sherry Jr. 2003. Teaching old brands new tricks: Retro branding and the revival of brand meaning. Journal of Marketing 67 (3): 19–33.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, J. 2013. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, 2nd ed. Newark: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  18. Collins, A., and E. Loftus. 1975. Theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review 82 (6): 407–428.Google Scholar
  19. Dickinson, S., and A. Barker. 2007. Evaluations of branding alliances between non-profit and commercial brand partners: The transfer of affect. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 12 (1): 75–89.Google Scholar
  20. Dickinson, S., and T. Heath. 2006. A comparison of qualitative and quantitative results concerning evaluations of co-branded offerings. Journal of Brand Management 13 (6): 393–406.Google Scholar
  21. Ellen, P.S., L.A. Mohr, and D.J. Webb. 2000. Charitable programs and the retailer: Do they mix? Journal of Retailing 76 (3): 393–406.Google Scholar
  22. Facebook. 2016. Leonardo DiCaprio, https://www.facebook.com/LeonardoDiCaprio/. Accessed August 22, 2016.
  23. Follows, S.B., and D. Jobber. 2000. Environmentally responsible purchase behaviour: A test of a consumer model. European Journal of Marketing 34 (5/6): 723–746.Google Scholar
  24. Gilmore, J.H., and J. Pine. 2007. Authenticity: What consumers really want. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  25. Greyser, S.A. 1999. Advancing and enhancing corporate reputation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 4 (4): 177–181.Google Scholar
  26. Hildebrand, D., S. Sankar, and C.B. Bhattacharya. 2011. Corporate social responsibility: A corporate marketing perspective. European Journal of Marketing 45 (9/10): 1353–1364.Google Scholar
  27. Hood, J. 2010. Celebrity philanthropy: The cultivation of China’s HIV/AIDS heroes. In Celebrity in China, ed. E. Louise, and J. Elaine, 85–102. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Ilicic, J., and S. Baxter. 2014. Fit in celebrity–charity alliances: when perceived celanthropy benefits nonprofit organisations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 19 (3): 200–208.Google Scholar
  29. Ilicic, J., and C. Webster. 2013. Celebrity co-branding partners as irrelevant brand information in advertisements. Journal of Business Research 66(7): 941–947.Google Scholar
  30. Ilicic, J., and C.M. Webster. 2014. Investigating consumer-brand relational authenticity. Journal of Brand Management 21 (4): 342–363.Google Scholar
  31. Ilicic, J., and C.M. Webster. 2016. Being true to oneself: Investigating celebrity brand authenticity. Psychology & Marketing 33 (6): 410–420.Google Scholar
  32. Kamins, M. 1990. An investigation of the ‘match-up hypothesis’ in celebrity advertising: When beauty may be only skin deep. Journal of Advertising 19 (1): 4–13.Google Scholar
  33. Kamins, M., and K. Gupta. 1994. Congruence between spokesperson and product type: A match-up hypothesis perspective. Psychology & Marketing 11 (1): 4–13.Google Scholar
  34. Lafferty, B.A., A.K. Lueth, and R. McCafferty. 2016. An evolutionary process model of cause-related marketing and systematic review of the empirical literature. Psychology & Marketing 33 (11): 951–970.Google Scholar
  35. Lee, H., T. Park, H. Moon, Y. Yang, and C. Kim. 2009. Corporate philanthropy, attitude towards corporations, and purchase intentions: A South Korea study. Journal of Business Research 62: 939–946.Google Scholar
  36. Lindeman, M., and M. Verkasalo. 2005. Measuring values with the short Schwartz’s value survey. Journal of Personality Assessment 85 (2): 170–178.Google Scholar
  37. Look to the Stars. 2012. Cameron Diaz and Leonardo DiCaprio attend TAG Heuer charity event. https://www.looktothestars.org/news/9254-cameron-diaz-and-leonardo-dicaprio-attend-tag-heuer-charity-event. Accessed January 23, 2017.
  38. Lynch, J., and D. Schuler. 1994. The matchup effect of spokesperson and product congruency: A schema theory interpretation. Psychology & Marketing 11 (5): 417–445.Google Scholar
  39. Ma, Y.J., and H.H. Lee. 2012. Understanding consumption behaviours for fair trade non-food products: Focusing on self-transcendence and openness to change values. International Journal of Consumer Studies 36 (6): 622–634.Google Scholar
  40. Martindale, C. 1991. Cognitive psychology: A neural network approach. Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. McShane, L., and P. Cunningham. 2012. To thine own self be true? Employees’ judgments of the authenticity of their organization’s corporate social responsibility program, Journal of Business Ethics 108 (1): 81–100.Google Scholar
  42. Merriam-Webster. 2017. Dictionary ‘real’ and ‘genuine’, https://www.merriam-webster.com. Accessed on January 23, 2017.
  43. Meyer, D., and J. Gamson. 1995. The challenge of cultural elites: Celebrities and social movements. Sociological Inquiry 65 (2): 181–206.Google Scholar
  44. Mitchell, A.A., and J.C. Olson. 1981. Are product attribute beliefs the only mediators of advertising effects on brand attitudes? Journal of Marketing Research 18 (3): 318–322.Google Scholar
  45. Moulard, J.G., C.P. Garrity, and D.H. Rice. 2015. What makes a human brand authentic? Identifying the antecedents of celebrity authenticity. Psychology & Marketing 32 (2): 173–186.Google Scholar
  46. Nan, X., and K. Heo. 2007. Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives: Examining the role of brand-cause fit in cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising 36 (2): 63–74.Google Scholar
  47. Napoli, J., S.J. Dickinson, M.B. Beverland, and F. Farrelly. 2014. Measuring consumer-based brand authenticity. Journal of Business Research 67 (6): 1090–1098.Google Scholar
  48. Podnar, K., and U. Golob. 2007. CSR expectations: the focus of corporate marketing. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 12 (4): 326–340.Google Scholar
  49. Porter, M.E., and M.R. Kramer. 2006. Strategy and society: Link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review 84 (12): 78–92.Google Scholar
  50. Robert, J. 2013. Individualistic philanthropy: The paradox of embodied participation for health related fund-raising campaigns. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 18: 261–274.Google Scholar
  51. Rokeach, M. 1973. The nature of human values, vol. 438. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  52. Saiia, D.H., A.B. Carroll, and A.K. Buchholtz. 2003. Philanthropy as strategy: When corporate charity begins at home. Business and Society 42: 169–201.Google Scholar
  53. Samu, S., and W. Wymer. 2009. The effect of fit and dominance in cause marketing communications. Journal of Business Research 62 (4): 432–440.Google Scholar
  54. Save the Children. 2016. Our partnership with Bulgari, https://www.savethechildren.net/about%20us/our-corporate-partners/bulgari. Accessed August 22, 2016.
  55. Schwartz, S.H. 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25 (1): 1–65.Google Scholar
  56. Schwartz, S.H., and W. Bilsky. 1990. Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58 (5): 878–891.Google Scholar
  57. Simonin, B.L., and J.A. Ruth. 1998. Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research 35 (1): 30–42.Google Scholar
  58. Spiggle, S., H.T. Nguyen, and M. Caravella. 2012. More than fit: Brand extension authenticity. Journal of Marketing Research 49 (6): 967–983.Google Scholar
  59. Steenhaut, S., and P. Van Kenhove. 2006. An empirical investigation of the relationships among a consumer’s personal values, ethical ideology and ethical beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics 64 (2): 137–155.Google Scholar
  60. Thompson, C.J., A. Rindfleisch, and Z. Arsel. 2006. Emotional branding and the strategic value of the doppelganger brand image. Journal of Marketing 70 (1): 50–64.Google Scholar
  61. Thomson, M. 2006. Human brands: Investigating antecedents to consumers’ strong attachments to celebrities. Journal of Marketing 70 (3): 104–119.Google Scholar
  62. Till, B., and M. Busler. 1998. Matching products with endorsers: attractiveness versus expertise. Journal of Consumer Marketing 15 (6): 576–586.Google Scholar
  63. Till, B., and M. Busler. 2000. The match-up hypothesis: Physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs. Journal of Advertising 14 (3): 1–13.Google Scholar
  64. Till, B., S. Stanley, and R. Priluck. 2008. Classical conditioning and celebrity endorsers: An examination of belongingness and resistance to extinction. Psychology & Marketing 25 (2): 179–196.Google Scholar
  65. Trimble, C.S., and N.J. Rifon. 2006. Consumer perceptions of compatibility in cause-related marketing messages. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 11: 29–47.Google Scholar
  66. Tsai, S. 2009. Corporate marketing management and corporate-identity building. Marketing Intelligence and Planning 26 (6): 621–633.Google Scholar
  67. Twitter. 2016. Leonardo DiCaprio. https://twitter.com/LeoDiCaprio?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor. Accessed 22 August 2016.
  68. Van Rekom, J., G. Jacobs, P.W. Verlegh, and K. Podnar. 2006. Capturing the essence of a corporate brand personality: A Western brand in Eastern Europe. Journal of Brand Management 14 (1–2): 114–124.Google Scholar
  69. Vulture. 2014. The 48 stars that people like less than Anne Hathaway. Accessed from http://www.vulture.com/2014/10/anne-hathaway-likable-star.html.
  70. Wymer, W., and T. Drollinger. 2015. Charity appeals using celebrity endorsers: Celebrity attributes most predictive of audience donation intentions. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 26 (6): 2694–2717.Google Scholar
  71. Zhou, Y., J. Thøgersen, Y. Ruan, and G. Huang. 2013. The moderating role of human values in planned behavior: The case of Chinese consumers’ intention to buy organic food. Journal of Consumer Marketing 30 (4): 335–344.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jasmina Ilicic
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stacey M. Baxter
    • 2
  • Alicia Kulczynski
    • 2
  1. 1.Monash Business SchoolMonash UniversityCaulfield EastAustralia
  2. 2.Newcastle Business SchoolThe University of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia

Personalised recommendations