Advertisement

Luxury brand dilution: investigating the impact of renting by Millennials on brand equity

  • Areti T. VogelEmail author
  • Sasikarn Chatvijit Cook
  • Kittichai Watchravesringkan
Original Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Modern forms of product acquisition, such as renting, provide consumers with either first-time or increased access at relatively low cost to products of brands that historically have relied on exclusivity as a part of their strategies. This study seeks to determine how the ability of Millennials to rent exclusive luxury brands affects the values of those brands from the consumer perspective (i.e., brand equity). A one-way (traditional vs. masstige brand offered renting option) between-subjects experimental design was used. Results reveal that the means of the brand credibility and brand leadership dimensions of traditional luxury brand equity were decreased significantly after a renting option was offered. Results further show that the means of the brand association and brand credibility dimensions of masstige brand equity were decreased significantly after a renting option was also offered. Implications and future research directions are addressed.

Keywords

Consumer brand equity Brand management Brand dilution Luxury brand Mode of acquisition Renting 

References

  1. Aaker, D.A. 1991. Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aaker, D.A. 1992. The value of brand equity. Journal of Business Strategy 13(4): 27–32.Google Scholar
  3. Aaker, D.A. 1996. Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California Management Review 38(3): 102–120.Google Scholar
  4. Ailawadi, K.L., and K.L. Keller. 2004. Understanding retail branding: Conceptual insights and research priorities. Journal of Retailing 80(4): 331–342.Google Scholar
  5. Amaldoss, W., and S. Jain. 2005. Conspicuous consumption and sophisticated thinking. Management Science 51(10): 1449–1466.Google Scholar
  6. Bardhi, F., and G.M. Eckhardt. 2012. Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research 39(4): 881–898.Google Scholar
  7. Belk, R.W. 2007. Why not share rather than own? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 611(1): 126–140.Google Scholar
  8. Belk, R.W. 2010. Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research 36(5): 715–734.Google Scholar
  9. Belk, R.W. 2014. You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research 67(8): 1595–1600.Google Scholar
  10. Berry, L.L., and K.E. Maricle. 1973. Consumption without ownership: Marketing opportunity for today and tomorrow. MSU Business Topics 21(1): 33–41.Google Scholar
  11. Bertoni, S. 2014. How mixing data and fashion can make rent the runway tech’s next billion dollar star, Forbes, 20 August. https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevenbertoni/2014/08/20/how-mixing-data-and-fashion-can-make-rent-the-runway-techs-next-billion-dollar-star/#79a7919c1fa0. Accessed 1 Apr 2016.
  12. Burns, L.D., K.K. Mullet, and N.O. Bryant. 2011. The Business of Fashion: Designing, Manufacturing, and Marketing. 4th ed. New York: Fairchild Books.Google Scholar
  13. Century, D. 2006. Jay-Z puts a cap on Cristal, The New York Times, 2 July. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/02/fashion/02cris.html. Accessed 9 Apr 2016.
  14. Chatvijit-Cook, S. 2017. Investigating antecedents and consequences of exploratory consumer behavior in the context of online fashion product rentailers. Dissertation, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, NC.Google Scholar
  15. Chen, K.W., and C.W. Wang. 2009. Advanced Statistical Analysis using SPSS and AMOS. Taipei: Wunan Book Co.Google Scholar
  16. Coulson, C. 2006. You’ve been wagged! The Daily Telegraph, 9 August. http://fashion.telegraph.co.uk/news-features/TMG3355473/Youve-been-WAGGED.html. Accessed 16 Mar 2016.
  17. D’Arpizio, C., F. Levato, D. Zito, and J. Montgolfier. 2014. Luxury goods worldwide market study fall-winter 2014: The rise of the borderless consumer. Bain and Company research report, 28 December. http://www.bain.com/publications/articles/luxury-goods-worldwide-market-study-fall-winter-2016.aspx. Accessed 26 Mar 2016.
  18. Doss, F., & Robinson, T. (2013). Luxury perceptions: Luxury brand vs counterfeit for young US female consumers. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 17: 424–439.Google Scholar
  19. Durgee, J.F., and G.C. O’Connor. 1995. An exploration into renting as consumption behavior. Journal of Psychology and Marketing 12(2): 89–104.Google Scholar
  20. Erdem, T., and J. Swait. 1998. Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon. Journal of Consumer Psychology 7(2): 131–157.Google Scholar
  21. Erdem, T., J. Swait, and J. Louviere. 2002. The impact of brand credibility on consumer price sensitivity. International Journal of Research in Marketing 19(1): 1–19.Google Scholar
  22. Farquhar, P.H. 1989. Managing brand equity. Marketing Research 1(3): 24–33.Google Scholar
  23. Ha-Brookshire, J.E., and N.N. Hodges. 2009. Socially responsible consumer behavior? Exploring used clothing donation behavior. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 27(3): 179–196.Google Scholar
  24. Herrmann, A., and F. Huber. 2000. Value-oriented brand positioning. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 10(1): 95–112.Google Scholar
  25. Holbrook, M.B. 1987. What is consumer research? Journal of Consumer Research 14(3): 128–131.Google Scholar
  26. Hwang, J., and M.A. Griffiths. 2017. Share more, drive less: Millennials’ value perception and behavioral intent in using collaborative consumption services. Journal of Consumer Marketing 34(2): 132–146.Google Scholar
  27. Kärkkäinen, H. 2013. Renting luxuries as an identity project—A hermeneutic approach. MS thesis, Aalto University School of Business, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  28. Keller, K.L. 1993. Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing 57(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
  29. Lahiri, I., and A. Gupta. 2009. Dilution of brand extensions: A study. International Journal of Commerce and Management 19(1): 45–57.Google Scholar
  30. Lawson, J. 2012. Luxury society: Will leasing luxury erode exclusivity? Luxury Society, 16 July. http://luxurysociety.com/en/articles/2012/07/will-leasing-luxury-erode-exclusivity/. Accessed 14 Mar 2016.
  31. Lawson, S. J. (2011). Forsaking ownership: Three essays on non-ownership consumption and alternative forms of exchange (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Florida State University Libraries.Google Scholar
  32. Lerman, S. 2014. Made in China: Imports will continue to drive down revenue, even as the economy strengthens, Ibisworld. http://clients1.ibisworld.com/reports/us/industry/. Accessed 14 Mar 2016.
  33. Lichtenstein, D.R., N.M. Ridgway, and R.G. Netemeyer. 1993. Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: A field study. Journal of Marketing Research 30(2): 234–245.Google Scholar
  34. Loken, B., and D.R. John. 1993. Diluting brand beliefs: When do brand extensions have a negative impact? The Journal of Marketing 57(3): 71–84.Google Scholar
  35. Macinnis, D.J., and S.F. Valerie. 2009. The disciplinary status of consumer behavior: A sociology of science perspective on key controversies. Journal of Consumer Research 36(3): 899–914.Google Scholar
  36. Millward Brown. 2015. 2015 BrandZ top 100 global brands (10th Anniversary Edition). http://www.millwardbrown.com/brandz/top-global-brands/2015. Accessed 17 Sept 2018.
  37. Mittendorf, C. 2018. Collaborative consumption: The role of familiarity and trust among millennials. Journal of Consumer Marketing 35(4): 377–391.Google Scholar
  38. Moeller, S., and K. Wittkowski. 2010. The burdens of ownership: Reasons for preferring renting. Managing Service Quality 20(2): 176–191.Google Scholar
  39. Moore, A., and M. Taylor. 2009. Why buy when you can rent? A brief investigation of differences in acquisition mode based on duration. Applied Economics Letters 16(12): 1211–1213.Google Scholar
  40. Oliver, R.L. 1997. Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  41. Pappu, R., P.G. Quester, and R.W. Cooksey. 2005. Consumer-based brand equity: Improving the measurement–empirical evidence. Journal of Product and Brand Management 14(3): 143–154.Google Scholar
  42. Park, C.S., and V. Srinivasan. 1994. A survey-based method for measuring and understanding brand equity and its extendibility. Journal of Marketing Research 31(2): 271–288.Google Scholar
  43. Phau, I., and M. Teah. 2009. Devil wears (counterfeit) Prada: A study of antecedents and outcomes of attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing 26(1): 15–27.Google Scholar
  44. Pouillard, V. 2011. Design piracy in the fashion industries of Paris and New York in the interwar years. Business History Review 85: 319–344.Google Scholar
  45. Privco .2016. Rent the Runway Inc. Private company financial report, http://www.privco.com/private-company/rent-the-runway-inc. Accessed 21 July 2016.
  46. Pullig, C., C.J. Simmons, and R.G. Netemeyer. 2006. Brand dilution: When do new brands hurt existing brands? Journal of Marketing 70(2): 52–66.Google Scholar
  47. Raju, S. 2014. Borrow, return, repeat. Huffington Post, 11 June. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sheila-raju/borrow-return-repeat-social-commerce_b_5479883.html. Accessed 10 Mar 2016.
  48. Shostack, G.L. 1977. Breaking free from product marketing. Journal of Marketing 41(2): 73–80.Google Scholar
  49. Simmel, G. 1957. Fashion. American Journal of Sociology 62(6): 541–558.Google Scholar
  50. Solomon, M. 2013. Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being. 10th ed. Upper-Saddle, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  51. Truong, Y., R. McColl, and P.J. Kitchen. 2009. New luxury brand positioning and the emergence of masstige brands. Journal of Brand Management 16(5–6): 375–382.Google Scholar
  52. Truong, Y., R. McColl, and P.J. Kitchen. 2010. Uncovering the relationships between aspirations and luxury brand preference. Journal of Product and Brand Management 19: 346–355.Google Scholar
  53. Twenge, J.M. 2006. Generation Me: Why Today’s Young Americans are More Confident, Assertive, and More Miserable than Ever Before. New York: Atria Books.Google Scholar
  54. Veblen, T. 1899. The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  55. Vigneron, F., and L.W. Johnson. 1999. A review and a conceptual framework of prestige-seeking behavior. Academy of Marketing Science Review 1999(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
  56. Vigneron, F., and L.W. Johnson. 2004. Measuring perceptions of brand luxury. Journal of Brand Management 11(6): 484–506.Google Scholar
  57. Wiedmann, K.P., N. Hennigs, and A. Siebels. 2009. Value-based segmentation of luxury consumption behavior. Psychology and Marketing 26(7): 625–651.Google Scholar
  58. Winsor, R.D., J.N. Sheth, and C. Manolis. 2004. Differentiating goods and services retailing using form and possession utilities. Journal of Business Research 57(3): 249–255.Google Scholar
  59. Wyckham, R.G., P.T. Fitzroy, and G.D. Mandry. 1975. Marketing of services: An evaluation of the theory. European Journal of Marketing 9(1): 59–67.Google Scholar
  60. Yoo, B., and N. Donthu. 2001. Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Business Research 52(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
  61. Yoo, B., N. Donthu, and S. Lee. 2000. An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28(2): 195–211.Google Scholar
  62. Zeithaml, V.A., A. Parasuraman, and L.L. Berry. 1985. Problems and strategies in services marketing. Journal of Marketing 49(2): 33–46.Google Scholar
  63. Zeithaml, V.A., A. Parasuraman, and L.L. Berry. 1988. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing 52(3): 2–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management, School of Business AdministrationStetson UniversityDeLandUSA
  2. 2.Department of Business Administration, Ralph W. Ketner School of BusinessCatawba CollegeSalisburyUSA
  3. 3.Department of Consumer, Apparel, and Retail Studies, The Bryan School of Business and EconomicsUNCGGreensboroUSA

Personalised recommendations