Non-stationary dividend-price ratios
Dividend yields have been widely used in previous research to relate stock market valuations to cash flow fundamentals. However, this approach relies on the assumption that dividend yields are stationary. Due to the failure to reject the hypothesis of a unit root in the classical dividend-price ratio for the US stock market, Polimenis and Neokosmidis (Int Rev Financ Anal 45:31–38, 2016) proposed the use of a modified dividend-price ratio (mdp) as the deviation between d and p from their long run equilibrium and showed that mdp provides substantially improved forecasting results over the classical dp ratio. Here, we extend that paper by performing multivariate regressions based on the Campbell–Shiller approximation, by utilizing a dynamic econometric procedure to estimate the modified dp, and by testing the modified ratios against reinvested dividend yields. By comparing the performance of mdp and dp in the period after 1965, we are not only able to enhance the robustness of the findings, but also able to show that the enhanced performance of the modified ratio in predicting future returns does not come from a capacity to predict the risk-free return component. Depending on whether one uses the recursive or population methodology to measure the performance of mdp, the out-of-sample performance gain is between 30 and 50%.
KeywordsDividend-price ratio Non-stationary ratios Cointegrated dividend-prices Modified dividend-price ratio
- Boswijk, H. P. 2001. Testing for a unit root with near-integrated volatility (No. 01-077/4). Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
- Dickey, D.A., and W.A. Fuller. 1979. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 427–431.Google Scholar
- Hamilton, J.D. 1994. Time series analysis, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Harris, R., and R. Sollis. 2003. Applied time series modelling and forecasting. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Rahbek, A., E. Hansen, and J. G. Dennis. 2002. ARCH innovations and their impact on cointegration rank testing. Centre for Analytical Finance working paper, 22, 15.Google Scholar