Advertisement

Performance expectations of basic options strategies may be different than you think

  • Steven P. ClarkEmail author
  • Mike Dickson
Original Article

Abstract

There is much empirical evidence for the existence of a negative volatility risk premium. We consider how the volatility risk premium affects the returns of portfolios implementing seven popular option strategies. We find that option selling generates substantial excess return as well as risk mitigation by providing short exposure to the volatility risk premium. Net option buying is able to protect against extreme losses; however, these losses are very infrequent and short lived. Even during these periods, the long net exposure to the volatility risk premium erodes protection as the depth and duration of the losses persist.

Keywords

Option returns Option strategy indexes Volatility risk premium 

Notes

References

  1. Baghdadabad, M.R.T. 2013. The effects of drawdown risk reduction on the US hedge funds. Journal of Derivatives and Hedge Funds 19: 50–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakshi, G., and N. Kapadia. 2003. Delta-hedged gains and the negative market volatility risk premium. The Review of Financial Studies 16(2): 527–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bollerslev, T., G. Tauchen, and H. Zhou. 2009. Expected stock returns and variance risk premia. Review of Financial Studies 22(11): 4463–4492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Camara, R.P., and BVdM Mendes. 2005. Maximum drawdown: Models and applications. The Journal of Alternative Investments 7(4): 89–91.Google Scholar
  5. Glosten, L.R., R. Jagannathan, and D.E. Runkle. 1993. On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. The Journal of Finance 48(5): 1779–1801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Israelov, R., and M. Klein. 2016. Risk and return of equty index collar strategies. The Journal of Alternative Investments 19(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Israelov, R., and L.N. Nielsen. 2015. Covered calls uncovered. Financial Analysts Journal 71(6): 44–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of North Carolina at CharlotteCharlotteUSA
  2. 2.Horizon Investments, LLCCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations