Journal of Asset Management

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 429–443 | Cite as

Success and failure on the corporate bond fund market

  • Martin RohlederEmail author
  • Hendrik Scholz
  • Marco Wilkens
Original Article


We present the first broad overview of the factors determining corporate bond fund success and failure in terms of performance and survival. We show that the main determinant of survival is size. Performance matters only for small funds while large funds survive unconditionally, consistent with maintaining fee revenues. We neither find persistence in performance nor diseconomies of scale. This is due to advantages of larger funds in corporate bond trading. Other fund and family characteristics are unrelated to performance and survival, contrasting previous finings in equity funds. Thus, there are similarities but also important differences between the factors determining success and failure on the corporate bond and equity fund markets.


Corporate bond funds Performance Disappearance and survival Fund size 

JEL Classification

G11 G12 



We thank the Editor (Marielle de Jong), the anonymous reviewer, John Bilson, Martin Brown, Maik Dierkes, Mardi Dungey, Teodor Dyakov, Oliver Entrop, Monika Gehde-Trapp, Sebastian Bunnenberg, Richard Levich, Andrew Lynch, Steffen Meyer, Sebastian Müller, Klaus Röder, Daniel Ruf, Dominik Schulte, Carolyn Wang, the participants of the 2011 ATINER International Conference on Finance in Athens, the 2012 Campus for Finance in Vallendar, the 2012 MFA Meeting in New Orleans, the 2012 SWFA Conference in New Orleans, and the 2012 EFMA Symposium on Asset Management in Hamburg, the 2015 Annual Meeting of the German Finance Association in Leipzig and seminar participants at the University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, the University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, the University of Liechtenstein, the University of Tasmania, and the University of Hannover for very helpful comments and suggestions. We are responsible for any remaining errors.


  1. Adam, T., and A. Guettler. 2015. Pitfalls and perils of financial innovation: The use of CDS by corporate bond funds. Journal of Banking and Finance 55: 204–2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, G.J., G. Cici, and S. Gibson. 2007. Does motivation matter when assessing trade performance? An analysis of mutual funds. Review of Financial Studies 20(1): 125–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berk, J. B., and I. Tonks. 2007. Return persistence and mutual fund flows in the worst performing mutual funds, NBER working paper series. Accessed 5 July 2018.
  4. Berk, J.B., and J.H. van Binsbergen. 2015. Measuring skill in the mutual fund industry. Journal of Financial Economics 118(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bessembinder, H., and W. Maxwell. 2008. Transparency and the corporate bond market. Journal of Economic Perspectives 22(2): 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bessembinder, H., W. Maxwell, and K. Vankataraman. 2006. Market transparency, liquidity externalities, and institutional trading costs in corporate bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 82(2): 251–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biswas, G., S. Nikolova, and C.W. Stahel. 2014. The transaction costs of trading corporate credit. Working paper. US Department of Treasury, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, SEC. Accessed 5 July 2018.
  8. Blackwell, D.W., and D.S. Kidwell. 1988. An investigation of cost differences between public sales and private placements of debt. Journal of Financial Economics 22(2): 253–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, S.J., W. Goetzmann, R.G. Ibbotson, and S.A. Ross. 1992. Survivorship bias in performance studies. Review of Financial Studies 5(4): 553–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, S.J., and W.N. Goetzmann. 1995. Performance persistence. Journal of Finance 50(2): 679–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carhart, M.M. 1997. On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance 52(1): 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carhart, M.M., J.N. Carpenter, A.W. Lynch, and D.K. Musto. 2002. Mutual fund survivorship. Review of Financial Studies 15(5): 1439–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chan, L.K.C., and J. Lakonishok. 1997. Institutional equity trading costs: NYSE versus NASDAQ. Journal of Finance 52(2): 713–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, J., H. Hong, M. Huang, and J.D. Kubik. 2004. Does fund size erode mutual fund performance? The role of liquidity and organization. American Economic Review 94(5): 1276–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen, Y., W. Ferson, and H. Peters. 2010. Measuring the timing ability and performance of bond mutual funds. Journal of Financial Economics 98(1): 72–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen, Y., and N. Qin. 2017. The behavior of investor flows in corporate bond mutual funds. Management Science 63(5): 1365–1381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen, L., and B. Schmidt. 2009. Attracting flows by attracting big clients. Journal of Finance 64(5): 2125–2151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Comer, G., and J. Rodriguez. 2013. A comparison of corporate versus government bond funds. Journal of Economics and Finance 37(4): 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dimson, E. 1979. Risk measurement when shares are subject to infrequent trading. Journal of Financial Economics 7(2): 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Denis, D.J., and V. Mihov. 2003. The choice among bank debt, non-bank private debt, and public debt: Evidence from new corporate borrowings. Journal of Financial Economics 70(1): 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Easley, D., and M. O’Hara. 1987. Price, trade size, and information in securities markets. Journal of Financial Economics 19(1): 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Edelen, R.M. 1999. Investor flows and the assessed performance of open-end mutual funds. Journal of Financial Economics 53(3): 439–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Edwards, A.K., E.H. Lawrence, and M.S. Piwowar. 2007. Corporate bond market transaction costs and transparency. Journal of Finance 62(3): 1421–1451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elton, E.J., M.J. Gruber, and C.R. Blake. 1995. Fundamental economic variables, expected returns, and bond fund performance. Journal of Finance 50(4): 1229–1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elton, E.J., M.J. Gruber, and C.R. Blake. 1996. Survivorship bias and mutual fund performance. Review of Financial Studies 9(4): 1097–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Elton, E.J., M.J. Gruber, and C.R. Blake. 2001. A first look at the accuracy of the CRSP mutual fund database and a comparison of the CRSP and Morningstar mutual fund databases. Journal of Finance 56(6): 2415–2430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Evans, R.B. 2010. Mutual fund incubation. Journal of Finance 65(4): 1581–1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Evans, R.B., and R. Fahlenbrach. 2012. Institutional investors and mutual fund governance: Evidence from retail-institutional fund twins. Review of Financial Studies 25(12): 3530–3571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Evans, R.B., M. Rohleder, H. Tentesch, and M. Wilkens. 2018. Diseconomies of scale, Information processing and hierarchy costs: Evidence from asset management. Working paper. University of Virginia, University of Augsburg. Accessed 5 July 2018.
  30. Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. 1993. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 33(1): 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fama, E.F., and J.D. MacBeth. 1973. Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy 81(3): 363–607.Google Scholar
  32. Fenn, G.W. 2000. Speed of issuance and the adequacy of disclosure in the 144a high-yield debt market. Journal of Financial Economics 56(3): 383–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goldstein, I., H. Jiang, and D.T. Ng. 2017. Investor flows and fragility in corporate bond funds. Journal of Financial Economics 126(3): 592–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huij, J., and J. Derwall. 2008. ‘Hot hands’ in bond funds. Journal of Banking & Finance 32(4): 559–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Natter, M., M. Rohleder, D. Schulte, and M. Wilkens. 2017. Bond mutual funds and complex investments. Journal of Asset Management 18(6): 433–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Natter, M., M. Rohleder, and M. Wilkens. 2018. Duration-adjusted bond fund performance. Working paper. University of Augsburg. Accessed 5 July 2018.
  37. Pástor, L., R.F. Stambaugh, and L.A. Taylor. 2015. Scale and skill in active management. Journal of Financial Economics 116(1): 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Petersen, M.A. 2009. Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies 22(1): 435–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rakowski, D. 2010. Fund flow volatility and performance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 45(1): 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rohleder, M., H. Scholz, and M. Wilkens. 2011. Survivorship bias and mutual fund performance: Relevance, significance, and methodical differences. Review of Finance 15(2): 441–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rohleder, M., D. Schulte, and M. Wilkens. 2017. Management of flow risk in mutual funds. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 48(1): 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rohleder, M., D. Schulte, J. Syryca, and M. Wilkens. 2018. Mutual fund stock-picking skill: New evidence from valuation- and liquidity motivated trading. Financial Management 47(2): 309–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schultz, P. 2001. Corporate bond trading costs: A peak behind the curtain. Journal of Finance 56(2): 677–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sirri, E.R., and P. Tufano. 1998. Costly search and mutual fund flows. Journal of Finance 53(5): 1589–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhao, X. 2005. Exit decisions in the US mutual fund industry. Journal of Business 78(4): 1365–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Finance and BankingUniversity of AugsburgAugsburgGermany
  2. 2.Chair of Finance and BankingFriedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-NürnbergNürnbergGermany

Personalised recommendations