Advertisement

AGGRESSIVE ENACTMENTS: CONTAINING THE “NO” IN CLINICAL WORK WITH SURVIVORS OF ABUSE

  • Marilyn CharlesEmail author
  • Zane Dodd
  • Gregory J. Stevens
Article

Abstract

Identity development depends on the ability to say ‘no.’ Setting limits enables a relationship between two separate individuals to develop. Early trauma can leave the individual so vigilant to others’ demands that internal prohibitions against intrusion remain silenced, which we conceptualize as a ‘no’ that could not be sufficiently articulated to keep the person safe. For those who have not been able to assert this fundamental limit, the consulting room provides a potential anchoring point to formulate and work through unconscious meanings. Being able to articulate and register the legitimacy of one’s own no becomes an important challenge, as tensions regarding power and powerlessness, trust and distrust, are acted out within the consulting room. Case material illustrates how psychoanalytic ideas regarding transference, countertransference, and enactment help the clinician tolerate the intrusion of past into present, inviting the type of mentalization that moves towards repair rather than merely reenacting the trauma.

Keywords

aggression enactment containment trauma identity development 

Notes

REFERENCES

  1. Atlas, G., & Aron, L. (2017). Dramatic dialogue: Contemporary clinical practice. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atwood, G. (2017). There must be blood. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77, 399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bass, A. (2003). “E” enactments in psychoanalysis: Another medium, another message. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13, 657–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 5–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benjamin, J. (2017). Beyond doer and done to: Recognition theory, intersubjectivity and the third. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berntsen, D., Rubin, D. C., & Siegler, I. C. (2011). Two versions of life: Negative and positive life events have different roles in the organization of life story and identity. Emotion-Washington-11, 5, 1190–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berntsen, D., Willert, M., & Rubin, D. C. (2003). Splintered memories or vivid landmarks? Qualities and organization of traumatic memories with and without PTSD. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 675–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bion, W. R. (1970). Attention and interpretation: A scientific approach to insight in psycho-analysis and groups. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  9. Bion, W. R. (1990). Brazilian lectures: 1973, São Paulo; 1974, Rio de Janeiro/São Paulo. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  10. Charles, M. (2001). Stealing beauty: An exploration of maternal narcissism. Psychoanalytic Review, 88, 549–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Charles, M. (2012). Working with trauma: Lessons from Bion and Lacan. New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  12. Ferenczi, S. (1932). The analyst as undertaker. In Clinical Diary of Sándor Ferenczi. J. Dupont (Ed.), M. Balint & N.Z. Jackson (Trans.) (pp. 51–53). Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press. 1988.Google Scholar
  13. Ferro, A. (2006). Clinical implications of Bion’s thought. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87, 989–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fonagy, P., & Alison, E. (2014). The role of mentalizing and epistemic trust in the therapeutic relationship. Psychotherapy, 51, 372–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E. L., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gallese, V. (2009). Mirror neurons, embodied simulation, and the neural basis of social identification. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19, 519–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gergely, G., & Watson, J. S. (1996). The social biofeedback theory of parental affect-mirroring: The development of emotional self-awareness and self-control in infancy. International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 77, 1181–1212.Google Scholar
  18. Gurevich, H. (2014). The return of dissociation as absence within absence. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 74, 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hesse, E., & Main, M. (1999). Second-generation effects of unresolved mourning in nonmal-treating parents: Dissociated, frightened, and threatening parental behavior. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 19, 481–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klein, M. (1930). The importance of symbol-formation in the development of the ego. International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 11, 24–39.Google Scholar
  21. Knox, J. (2013). The mind in fragments: The neuroscientific, developmental, and traumatic roots of dissociation and their implications for clinical practice. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 33, 449–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lanius, R. A., Vermettern, E., & Pain, C. (2010). The impact of early life trauma on health and disease: The hidden epidemic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liotti, G. (1999). Disorganization of attachment as a model for understanding dissociative psychopathology. In J. Solomon & C. George (Eds.), Attachment disorganization (pp. 291–317). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lyons-Ruth, K. (2008). Contributions of the mother–infant relationship to dissociative, borderline, and conduct symptoms in young adulthood. Infant Mental Health Journal, 29, 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lysaker, P. H., Gumley, A., & Dimaggio, G. (2011). Metacognitive disturbances in persons with severe mental illness: Theory, correlates with psychopathology and models of psychotherapy. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 84, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Main, M., & Hesse, E. (1990). Parents’ unresolved traumatic experiences are related to infant disorganized attachment status: Is frightened/frightening parental behavior the linking mechanism? In E. M. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & M. T. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years (pp. 161–182). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Malatesta, C. Z., & Haviland, J. M. (1985). Signs, symbols, and socialization. In M. Lewis & C. Saarni (Eds.), The socialization of emotions (pp. 89–115). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitrani, J. L. (2001). ‘Taking the transference’: Some technical implications in three papers by Bion. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 82, 1085–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mucci, C. (2014). Trauma, healing and the reconstruction of the truth. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 74, 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Porges, S. W. (1997). Emotion: An evolutionary by-product of the neural regulation of the autonomic nervous system. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 807, 62–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Segal, H. (1957). Notes on symbol formation. International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 38, 391–397.Google Scholar
  32. Stern, D. B. (2015). Unformulated experience: From dissociation to imagination in psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Tomkins, S. S. (1978). Script theory: Differential magnification of affects. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 26, 201–236.Google Scholar
  34. Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. Winnicott, D. W. (1974). Fear of breakdown. International Review of Psycho-analysis, 1, 103–107.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marilyn Charles
    • 1
    Email author
  • Zane Dodd
    • 1
  • Gregory J. Stevens
    • 1
  1. 1.Austen Riggs CenterStockbridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations