Advertisement

The lonely passion of the “people”*

  • Robert M. Prince
Article

Abstract

This paper explores the psychological sources of support for a leader, and unwavering belief in the illusions he promotes, which persists despite confrontation with reality. Lonely passion is an oxymoron. It is passion because of the intensity of the supporters’ longing which is partially shaped by fear and loss. Their passion is lonely because they appear to be left empty with their love unrequited, having given their selves up and only having an illusion in return. It explores the effects of socio-economic disruption in creating or contributing to the development of a “social character” and threatening the integrity of the self. It explores the characteristics of the leader, including methods of manipulation, in eliciting passionate devotion. It uses Ferenczi’s Confusion of Tongues situation as a model for understanding the relationship between leader and follower. The idealization of the leader as a power to be feared and a savior from the imagined threats he has created, and the dynamics of identification, masochism and victimization are invoked. The only remedy for the toxicity of the situation is empathy, which is understood in a historical as well as psychological context.

Keywords

authoritarianism followers of Trump facticity confusion of tongues identification empathy 

References

  1. Akhtar, S. (1999). Immigration and identity: Turmoil, treatment, and transformation. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
  3. Buie, D. H. (1981). Empathy: Its nature and limitations. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 29, 281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bychowski, G. (1969). Dictators and disciples: From Caesar to Stalin: A psychoanalytic interpretation of history. New York, NY: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  5. Danto, E. A. (2005). Freud’s free clinics: Psychoanalysis & social justice, 1918–1938. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eekhoff, J. K. (2013). Infantile trauma, therapeutic impasses and recovery. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 73, 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Felman, S., & Laub, D. (Eds.). (1991). Testimony: Crises of witnessing in literature, Psychoanalysis, and history. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Ferenczi, S. 1920–32. Notes and Fragments. In Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho-analysis. (pp. 265–267). New York, NY: Bruner/Mazel. 1994.Google Scholar
  9. Ferenczi, S. 1926. The problem of acceptance of unpleasant ideas—advances in knowledge of the sense of reality. In Further contributions to the problems and methods of psycho-analysis. (pp. 356–379). New York: Bruner/Mazel. 1994.Google Scholar
  10. Ferenczi, S. 1932. The clinical diary of Sándor Ferenczi. J. Dupont (Ed.), M. Balint & N. Z. Jackson (Trans.). Cambridge, MA. & London: Harvard University Press. 1988.Google Scholar
  11. Ferenczi, S. (1933). Confusion of tongues between the adults and the child. The language of tenderness and of passion. In Final contribution to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis. pp. 156–167. London: Karnac. 1994.Google Scholar
  12. Frankel, J. (2017). Ferenczi’s evolving conception of narcissistic pathology and its basis in trauma. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77, 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frie, R. (2018a). Historical trauma and lived experience. In R. Frie (Ed.), History flows through us: Germany, the Holocaust and the importance of empathy (pp. 1–14). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Frie, R. (2018b). Psychoanalysis and history at the crossroads. In R. Frie (Ed.), History flows through us: Germany, the Holocaust and the importance of empathy (pp. 157–187). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Fromm, E. 1936. Sozialpsychologischer Teil. In M. Horkheimer (Ed.), Studien über Autorität und Familie (pp. 77–136). Paris: Librairie Alcan. Republished in English (2000) as The social determinants of psychoanalytic therapy. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 9, 149–165.Google Scholar
  16. Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. New York, NY: Farrar & Rinehart.Google Scholar
  17. Fromm, E. (1947). Man for himself. An inquiry into the psychology of ethics. New York, NY: Rinehart.Google Scholar
  18. Haynal, A., Molnár, M., & de Puymège, G. (1983). Fanaticism: A historical and psychoanalytic study. New York, NY: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffer, A., & Buie, D. H. (2016). Helplessness and the analyst’s war against feeling it. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 76, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hofstadter, R. J. (1952). The paranoid style in American politics. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  21. Horney, K. (1950). Neurosis and human growth: The struggle toward self- realization. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  22. Klein, M. 1946–1963. Envy and gratitude and other works (19461963). London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  23. Kogan, I. (2018). Master of the universe: Scorsese’s “The Wolf of Wall Street” through a psychoanalytic lens. American Journal of Psychoanalysis.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-018-9144-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. New York, NY: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure? in A. Goldberg & P. E. Stepansky (Eds.), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kohut, T. A. (2012). A German generation: An experiential history of the Twentieth Century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Orwell, G. (1954). 1984. New York, NY: Signet.Google Scholar
  28. Portnoy, I. (1971). Choice: the human prerogative. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 31, 35–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prince, R. (1999). The Legacy of the Holocaust. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  30. Prince, R. 2004. Book Review. Small differences and their vicissitudes: A review of Blood Lines: From Ethnic Pride To Ethnic Terrorism, by Vamik Volkan, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997, 280 pp. and The Third Reich in the Unconscious, Transgenerational Transmission and Its Consequences, by Vamik Volkan, Gabrielle Ast, William Greer, Jr., New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge, 2002. 211 pp. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 40, 472–481.Google Scholar
  31. Prince, R. (2016a). Predatory Identity. In J. Mills & R. Naso (Eds.), Humanizing Evil (pp. 108–128). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Prince, R. (2016b). Past Imperfect -Historical Trauma and It’s Transmission. In J. Mills & R. Naso (Eds.), The Ethics of Evil (pp. 203–232). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Prince, R. (2018a). The stowaway: Reality, the Holocaust, and the historical unconscious. In R. Frie (Ed.), History flows though us: Germany, The Holocaust and the importance of empathy (pp. 91–107). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Prince, R. (2018b). Sympathy for the Devil: Evil, social process, and intelligibility. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 54, 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rangell, L. (1980). The mind of Watergate: An exploration of the compromise of integrity. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  36. Reich, W. (1933). The mass psychology of Fascism (p. 1970). New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Google Scholar
  37. Roazen, P. (1968). Freud: Political and social thought. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
  38. Rubin, T. I. (1990). The transitional personality: Dislocation as a major character dynamic. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 50, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Runia, E. (2010). Into cleanness leaping: The vertiginous urge to commit history. History and Theory, 49, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Snyder, T. (2018). The road to unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America. New York, NY: Time Duggan Books.Google Scholar
  41. Sullivan, H. S. (1965). Personal psychopathology. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  42. Volkan, V. D., Ast, G., & Greer, W. F. (2002). The Third Reich in the unconscious. Transgenerational transmission and its consequences. New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ABPPGreat NeckUSA

Personalised recommendations