READING WILLY WONKA IN THE ERA OF ANTI-THINKING

  • Ian S. Miller
Article

Abstract

Whether encountered as a movie or novel, Roald Dahl’s Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is a childhood staple of postwar Anglophone culture. Originally published in 1964, Dahl’s story of “Willie Wonka” is a morality tale for our times addressed by the present essay in relation to the precariousness, violence, intergenerational faith, and materialist fantasies reflective of contemporary life in the early twenty-first century. Compensating for the precarity of contemporary life’s impoverishment as assumptions of societal stability are overthrown, this chronicle of the Bucket family details: envious desire validated by large group chosen trauma; authoritarian enslavement of inferior, colonized peoples with murderous, industrial-level human experimentation; toward gratification of the greedy fantasy of unlimited sweetness under the sway of lethal identification with the aggressor.

Keywords

Willy Wonka precarity intergenerational chosen trauma fantasy identification 

REFERENCES

  1. Anderson, E., & Cissna, K. (1957). The Martin Buber–Carl Rogers dialogue: A new transcript with commentary (p. 1997). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bion, W. R. (1962). The psycho-analytic study of thinking. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 43, 306–310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bion, W. R., & Bion, F. (2005). The Tavistock seminars. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  4. Burton, T. (2005). Charlie and the chocolate factory (motion picture). US: Warner Bros.Google Scholar
  5. Cervantes, M. (1605). Don Quixote (E. Grossman, Trans., p. 2003). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  6. Dahl, R. (1964). Charlie and the chocolate factory. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
  7. Eco, U. (1985). On ‘Krazy Kat’ and ‘Peanuts’. The New York Review of Books, 32(10), 16–17.Google Scholar
  8. Frankfort, H. (2005). On Bullshit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. Standard edition (Vols. 4–5, pp. 1–627). London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  10. Freud, S. (1910). Five lectures on psycho-analysis. Standard edition (Vol. 11, pp. 1–56). London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  11. Freud, S. (1911). Formulations on the two principles of mental functioning. Standard edition (Vol. 12, pp. 213–226). London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  12. Freud, S. (1919). The “Uncanny”. Standard edition (Vol. 17, pp. 217–252). London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  13. Freud, S (1923). The infantile genital organization. Standard edition (Vol. 19, pp. 139–146). London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, A. (General Editor) (1968). The Jerusalem Bible. Reader’s edition. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  15. Kilborne, B. (2014). Trauma and the unconscious: Double conscience, the uncanny and cruelty. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 74, 4–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lasch, C. (1979). The culture of narcissism. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  17. Margulies, S., Wolper, D. (Producers), & Stuart, M. (Director). (1971). Willy Wonka and the chocolate factory (motion picture). US: Paramount.Google Scholar
  18. Miller, I. (2015). On minding and being minded: Experiencing Bion and Beckett. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  19. Rank, O. (1914). The double. A psychoanalytic study (edited by H. Tucker, Jr., Trans., p. 1971). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  20. Schulz, C. (1950–2000). Peanuts. US: United Features Syndicate. 1950–2011. Universal Uclick. 2011–present.Google Scholar
  21. Volkan, V. (2001). Transgenerational transmissions and chosen traumas: An aspect of large-group identity. Group Analysis, 34, 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Volkan, V. (2013). Large-group-psychology in its own right: Large-group identity and peace-making. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 10, 210–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Who exactly are the 1%? (2012, January 21). The Economist. http://www.economist.com/node/21543178#print.
  24. Winnicott, D. W. (1949). Hate in the counter-transference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 30, 69–74.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian S. Miller
    • 1
  1. 1.Kilmainham Congregational ChurchDublin 8Ireland

Personalised recommendations