From Die Traumdeutung to The Squiggle Game: A Brief History of an Evolution

  • Alberto Stefana
Article

Abstract

It is often possible to retrace the history of a new concept or a new technique, identifying precursor and reflections that would lay the foundations for the birth of something “new”. This also applies to the “squiggle game” of Donald W. Winnicott, one of the Winnicottian “creations” in which the distinctive signs of its fatherhood are more evident as, at the same time, are evident several debts to other scientists: from Freud’s interpretation of dreams, through Jung, Klein and Fordham to Milner’s “free drawings”.

Keywords

Die Traumdeutung squiggle game free drawings history of psychoanalysis Donald Winnicott 

References

  1. Anzieu, D. (1975). Freud’s self-analysis. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bacciagaluppi, M. (2017). Pierre Janet and Auguste Forel: Two historical contributions. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77, 417–439.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Breton, A. (1924). Manifestes du surréalisme. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  4. Breuer, J. & Freud, S. (1892–1895). Studies on Hysteria. Standard Edition, Vol. 2. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  5. Carotenuto, A. (2007). Su Jung [About Jung]. In R. Zerbetto (Ed.), Fondamenti comuni e diversità di approccio in psicoterapia [Common foundations and diversity of approach in psychotherapy]. FrancoAngeli: Milano.Google Scholar
  6. Charles, M. (2012). Rediscovering the enduring power of Marion Milner’s work. Book Review Essay of Milner’s A life of One’s Own: An Experiment in Leisure; On Not Being Able to Paint; The Hands of the Living God: An Account of Psycho-Analytic Treatment; Eternity’s Sunrise: A Way of Keeping a Diary. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 72, 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chilvers, I. & Glaves-Smith, J. (2009). A dictionary of modern and contemporary art (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dragstedt, N. R. (1998). Creative illusions: The theoretical and clinical work of Marion Milner. Journal of Melanie Klein and Object Relations, 16, 425–536.Google Scholar
  9. Ellenberger, H. F. (1970). The discovery of the unconscious. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Fordham, M. (1944). The life of childhood. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  11. Fordham, M. (1978). Jungian psychotherapy. A study in analytical psychology. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Freud, S. (1896a). Heredity and the aetiology of the neuroses. Standard Edition, Vol. 3. 141–156. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  13. Freud, S. (1896b). Further remarks on the neuropsychoses of defence. Standard Edition, Vol. 3. 157–185. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  14. Freud, S. (1896c). The aetiology of hysteria. Standard Edition, Vol. 3. 163–168. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  15. Freud, S. (1899). The interpretation of dreams. Standard Edition, Vols. 4 and 5. 1–626. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  16. Giannakoulas, A. (2010). La tradizione psicoanalitica britannica indipendente [The British Independent tradition of psychoanalysis]. Roma: Borl.Google Scholar
  17. Gordon, R. (1978). Dying and creating: A search for meaning. London: Library of Analytical Psychology.Google Scholar
  18. Günter, M. (2003). Playing the unconscious: Psychoanalytic interviews with children using Winnicott’s squiggle technique. London: Karnac, 2007.Google Scholar
  19. Gurevich, H. (2016). Orpha, orphic functions, and the orphic analyst: Winnicott’s “regression to dependence” in the language of Ferenczi. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 76, 322–340.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Janet, P. (1890). L’Automatisme Psychologique. Paris: Felix Alcan.Google Scholar
  21. Jung, C. G. (Ed.). (1906). Diagnostische Assoziationsstudien: Beiträge zur experimentellen Psychopathologie [Diagnosticassociation studies: contributions to experimental psychopathology] (Vol. 1). Leipzig: Verlag von Johann Ambrosius.Google Scholar
  22. Jung, C. G. (1913–30). In S. Shamdasani (Ed.), The red book: Liber novus. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company, 2009.Google Scholar
  23. Jung, C. G. (1921). Psychological types. Collected works of C.G. Jung, Vol. 6: Psychological types. New York, NY: Pantheon Books, 1971.Google Scholar
  24. Jung, C. G. (1929). The aims of psychotherapy. Collected works of C.G. Jung, Vol. 16: Practice of psychotherapy. New York, NY: Pantheon Books, 1977.Google Scholar
  25. Jung, C. G. (1934). The meaning of psychology for modern man. Collected works of C.G. Jung, Vol. 10: Civilization in transition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  26. Jung, C. G. (1936). Psychological factors determining human behavior. Collected works of C.G. Jung, Vol. 8: The structure and dynamics of the psyche. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  27. Jung, C. G. (1961). Memories, dreams, reflections. London: Collins and Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Klein, M. (1926). The psychological principles of infant analysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 8, 25–37.Google Scholar
  29. Klein, M. (1927). Symposium on child-analysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 8, 339–370.Google Scholar
  30. Klein, M. (1929). Personification in the play of children. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 10, 193–204.Google Scholar
  31. Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic explorations in art. New York, NY: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  32. Letley, E. (2014). Marion Milner: The life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Maclagan, D. (1992). Between psychoanalysis and surrealism: The collaboration between Grace Pailthorpe and Reuben Mednikoff. Free Associations, 3, 33–50.Google Scholar
  34. Magritte, R. (1938). In A. Blavier (Ed.), Écrits complets. Paris: Flammarion, 2009.Google Scholar
  35. Meltzer, D. (1975) Adhesive Identification. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 11, 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mertens, W. (1999). Traum und Traumdeutung [Dream and interpretation of dreams]. München: Beck.Google Scholar
  37. Mertens, W. (2000). ‘L’interpretazione dei sogni cento anni dopo’ [The interpretation of dreams, one hundred years later]. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane XXXIV, 1, 5–30.Google Scholar
  38. Milner, M. (1950). On not being able to paint. London: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
  39. Milner, M. (1952). Aspects of symbolism in comprehension of the not-self. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 33, 181–195.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Milner, M. (1957). The ordering of chaos. The suppressed madness of sane men: Forty-four years of exploring psychoanalysis (pp. 181–193). London: Institute of Psycho-Analysis.Google Scholar
  41. Milner, M. (1969). The hands of the living god: An account of a psycho-analytic treatment. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  42. Milner, M. (1975). A discussion of Masud Khan’s paper “In Search of the Dreaming Experience”. The suppressed madness of sane men: Forty-four years of exploring psychoanalysis (pp. 275–278). London: Institute of Psycho-Analysis.Google Scholar
  43. Milner, M. (1987). The suppressed madness of sane men. London: Institute of Psycho-Analysis.Google Scholar
  44. Phillips, A. (1988). Winnicott. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Rodman, F. R. (2003). Winnicott: Life and work. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rudnytsky, P. L. (1991). The psychoanalytic vocation. Rank, Winnicott, and the legacy of Freud. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rycroft, C. (1975). Dreams and the literary imagination. In The innocence of dreams (pp. 153–167). New York, NY: Pantheon Books, 1979.Google Scholar
  48. Sayers, J. (2002). Marion Milner, mysticism and psycho-analysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 83, 105–120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Silberer, J. (1909). Report on a method of eliciting and observing certain symbolic hallucination-phenomena. In D. Rapaport (Ed.). Organization and pathology of thought: Selected sources, (pp. 195–207). New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
  50. Stefana, A. (2011). Introduzione al pensiero di Marion Milner [Introduction to Marion Milner’s thought]. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 45, 355–374.Google Scholar
  51. Stefana, A. (2017). History of Countertransference. From Freud to the British Object Relations School. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Stefana, A. (2018a). Marion Milner. Die Rolle der ästhetischen Erfahrung im künstlerischen Schaffensprozess [Marion Milner, the role of aesthetic experience in artistic creation]. Psyche, 72(1), 50–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stefana, A. (2018b). Marion Milner: Creativity and play in the consulting room. Journal of Child Psychotherapy (accepted for publication).Google Scholar
  54. Stefana, A. & Gamba, A. (2018). From the ‘squiggle game’ to ‘games of reciprocity’ Towards a creative co-construction of a space for working with adolescents. International Journal of Psychoanalysis (accepted for publication).Google Scholar
  55. Swan, W. (2008). C.G. Jung’s psychotherapeutic technique of active imagination in historical context. Psychoanalysis and History, 10, 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Winnicott, D. W. (1951). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena: A study of the first not-me possession. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 34, 89–97.Google Scholar
  57. Winnicott, D. W. (1968). The squiggle game. In Psycho-Analytic Explorations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  58. Winnicott, D. W. (1971a). Therapeutic consultation in child psychiatry. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  59. Winnicott, D. W. (1971b). Playing and reality. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  60. Winnicott, D. W. (1989). Notes on play. In C. Winnicott, R. Shepherd & M. Davis (Eds.) Psychoanalytic explorations (pp. 59–63). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Stefana
    • 1
  1. 1.BresciaItaly

Personalised recommendations