Advertisement

The American Journal of Psychoanalysis

, Volume 78, Issue 1, pp 74–88 | Cite as

Binocular Vision in the Total Situation

  • Christo Joannidis
Article
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

This paper investigates the concept of “total situation” which, even though introduced into psychoanalytic thinking via sister disciplines, such as sociology, the neurosciences, etc., has gradually acquired a relatively prominent position in current therapeutic practice. It is used as a metaphor for the envelopment of the unfolding transferential and related events in the analytic process. Irrespective of whether one focuses on the individual analytic condition or the group-analytic one, contemporary psychoanalytic perspectives include both the bi-personal unconscious interactions and the various levels of the total situation in their conceptualizations of the nature of the process. Such a complex approach in conceptualization can only be achieved through the so-called binocular vision of the analyst.

Keywords

binocular vision total situation transference 

References

  1. Adorno, T. (1951). Minima Moralia: Reflections from a damaged life (p. 1981). London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  2. Agazarian, Y. M. (1989). Group-as-a-whole: Systems theory and practice. Group, 13, 131–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anzieu, D. (1966). Étude psychanalytique des groupes réels. Les Temps Modernes, 242, 56–73.Google Scholar
  4. Aulagnier, P. (2001). The violence of interpretation: From pictogram to statement. London: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Baranger, M., & Baranger, W. (2008). The analytic situation as a dynamic field. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 89, 795–826.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Baranger, M., Baranger, W., & Mom, J. (1983). Process and non-process in analytic work. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 64, 1–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups and other papers. London: Tavistock.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bion, W. (1962). Learning from experience. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  9. Bion, W. (1965). Transformations. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  10. Bion, W. (1970). Attention and interpretation. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  11. Bion, W. (1992). Cogitations. London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
  12. Bleger, J. (1964). El grupo como institución y el grupo en las instituciones. In Jose Bleger (ed.) Temas de psicologia: Entrevistas y grupos. (pp. 101–123) Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión. 1971.Google Scholar
  13. Carnochan, P. (2011). Jealousy and the capacity to imagine: commentary on paper by Stephanie Lewin. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 21, 580–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cavell, M. (1991). The subject of mind. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 72, 141–154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Charles, M. (2003). Mirroring from the perspective of the theories of Matte-Blanco. Psychoanalytic Review, 90, 791–809.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Charles, M. (2016). Race and recognition: The time of our singing. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 76, 140–160.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Civitarese, G. (2011). Exploring core concepts: Sexuality, dreams and the unconscious. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 92, 277–280.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Davies, J. D. (1955). Phrenology: Fad and science: A 19th-century American crusade. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Eigen, M. (1981). The area of faith in Winnicott, Lacan and Bion. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 62, 413–433.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Eisold, K. (1985). Recovering Bion’s contributions to group analysis. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 45, 327–340.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Elias, N. S. (1939). Civilizing process. Oxford: Blackwell. 1978.Google Scholar
  22. Foulkes, S. H. (1948). Introduction to group analytic psychotherapy. London: Karnac. 1983.Google Scholar
  23. Foulkes, S. (1974). My philosophy in psychotherapy. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 6, 109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams (Vols. 4–5, pp. 1–626)., Standard Edition London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  25. Freud, S. (1914). On narcissism: An introduction (Vol. 14, pp. 67–103)., Standard Edition London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  26. Freud, S. (1919). Lines in advance of psychoanalytic therapy (Vol. 17, pp. 157–168)., Standard Edition London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  27. Freud, S. (1921). Group psychology and the analysis of the Ego (Vol. 18, pp. 65–143)., Standard Edition London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  28. Gadamer, H-G. (1976). Philosophical hermeneutics. D. Linge (Ed. & Trans.) Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Goldstein, K. (1934). The organism: A holistic approach to biology derived from pathological data in man (p. 1939). New York: American Book Co.Google Scholar
  30. Grínberg, L., Sor, D., & De Blanchedi, E. T. (1974). Bion’s concept of psychosis. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 10, 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grotstein, J. S. (2004). “The light militia of the lower sky”: The deeper nature of dreaming and phantasying. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 14, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Joseph, B. (1985). Transference: The total situation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 66, 447–454.Google Scholar
  33. Kaës, R. (1993). Le groupe et le sujet du groupe. Eléments pour une théorie psychanalytique des groupes. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
  34. Kelman, H. (1944). A new approach to dream interpretation. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 4, 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kelman, H. (1956). Goals in therapy: a Roundtable discussion. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 16, 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klein, M. (1940). Mourning and its relation to manic-depressive states. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 21, 125–153.Google Scholar
  37. Klein, M. (1952). The origins of transference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 33, 433–438.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Loewald, H. (1970). Psychoanalytic theory and the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 25, 45–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Meltzer, D. (1978). The Kleinian development. London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
  40. Milner, M. (1945). Some aspects of phantasy in relation to general psychology. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 26, 143–152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ogden, T. (2003). What is true and whose idea was it? International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 84, 593–606.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Pontalis, J.-B. (1963). Le petit groupe comme objet. Les Temps Modernes, 211, 1057–1069.Google Scholar
  43. Racker, H. (1957). The meanings and uses of countertransference. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 26, 303–357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Sandler, J. (1960). On the concept of superego. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 15, 128–162.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Stace, W. T. (1955). The philosophy of Hegel. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  46. Whitaker, C. (1955). The doctor-patient relationship in therapy: A roundtable discussion. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 15, 19–21.Google Scholar
  47. Whitehead, C. (2001). Social mirrors and shared experiential worlds. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 3–36.Google Scholar
  48. Winnicott, D. W. (1958). Through paediatrics to psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth. 1975.Google Scholar
  49. Winnicott, D. W. (1986). Holding and interpretation: Fragment of an analysis. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christo Joannidis
    • 1
  1. 1.AthensGreece

Personalised recommendations