How and why organisations use social media: five use types and their relation to absorptive capacity
- 1.8k Downloads
In this paper, we examine the relation between social media use and the absorptive capacity of organisations. Over the past 10 years, many organisations have systematically adopted social media. Trade press and consulting companies often claim that the systematic use of social media increases the performance of organisations. However, such claims are typically neither empirically grounded nor theoretically examined. In this paper, based on key informant interviews at 20 organisations, we examine these claims empirically and theoretically. Firstly, we examine the ways in which social media are used by organisations. We identify five different social media use types that support different organisational purposes (broadcast, dialogue, collaboration, knowledge management and sociability). Secondly, we analyse how these five social media use types relate to organisations’ absorptive capacity. We find that particular social media use types (e.g., dialogue) support organisations’ absorptive capacity and, ultimately, their performance although others (e.g., sociability) do not.
Keywordsinformation technology social media organisational theory absorptive capacity field research
The authors would like to thank the participants for taking the time to partake in the study. The authors also wish to thank editors and reviewers at the Journal of Information Technology, as well as the reviewers and audiences at previous conference and workshop presentations of early versions, for their valuable feedback.
- Bacon, M. (2012). Pragmatism: An introduction, Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
- Barnes, N.G., Lescault, A.M. and Andonian, J. (2012). Social Media Surge by the 2012 Fortune 500. Report.Google Scholar
- Berinato, S. (2010). Six Ways to Find Value in Twitter’s Noise, Harvard Business Review 88(6): 34–35.Google Scholar
- Boell, S.K. and Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2014). On Being ‘Systematic’ in Literature Reviews in IS, Journal of Information Technology 34(1): 12.Google Scholar
- Cisco (2012). Cisco DocWiki: about [WWW document] http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/DocWiki:About (updated 13 February 2012) (accessed 15 June 2015).
- Culnan, M.J., McHugh, P.J. and Zubillaga, J.I. (2010). How Large US Companies Can Use Twitter and Other Social Media to Gain Business Value, MIS Quarterly Executive 9(4): 243–259.Google Scholar
- Curtis, A.M., Wells, T.M., Lowry, P.B. and Higbee, T. (2008). An Overview and Tutorial of the Repertory Grid Technique in Information Systems Research, Communications of the Association for Information Systems 23(1): 37–62.Google Scholar
- Efimova, L. and Grudin, J. (2007). Crossing Boundaries: A case study of employee blogging, Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). Waikoloa, HI, USA, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?reload=true&arnumber=4076543.
- Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative Analysis: Practise and innovation, London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J.J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Goldkuhl, G. (2008). of Conference. What Kind of Pragmatism in Information Systems Research? AIS SIG Prag Inaugural Meeting. Paris, France, http://www.vits.org/publikationer/dokument/663.pdf.
- Harvey, C., Kelly, A., Morris, H. and Rowlinson, M. (2010). Academic Journal Quality Guide, London, UK: The Association of Business Schools.Google Scholar
- Helfat, C.E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M.A., Singh, H., Teece, D.J. and Winter, S.G. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: Dynamic strategic change in organizations, Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Kiron, D., Palmer, D., Phillips, A.N. and Kruschwitz, N. (2012). What Managers Really Think About Social Business, MIT Sloan Management Review 53(4): 51–60.Google Scholar
- Larson, K. and Watson, R.T. (2011). The Value of Social Media: Toward measuring social media strategies, in International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Shanghai, China, http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/proceedings/onlinecommunity/10/.
- Majchrzak, A., Cherbakov, L. and Ives, B. (2009). Harnessing the Power of the Crowds with Corporate Social Networking Tools: How IBM does it, MIS Quarterly Executive 8(2): 103–108.Google Scholar
- Majchrzak, A. and Markus, M.L. (2013). Technology Affordances and Constraints in Management Information Systems (MIS), in E. Kessler (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Management Theory, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 832–835.Google Scholar
- McAfee, A.P. (2009). Enterprise 2.0: New collaborative tools for your organization’s toughest challenges, Harvard, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
- McKinsey Global Institute (2012). The Social Economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies. Report.Google Scholar
- Neuman, W.L. (2010). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7e), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Norman, D.A. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things (3e), New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Parameswaran, M. and Whinston, A.B. (2007). Social Computing: An overview, Communications of the Association for Information Systems 19(1): 762–780.Google Scholar
- Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Rao, L. (2010). Yammer debuts a facebook for the enterprise [WWW document] http://techcrunch.com/2010/09/28/yammer-debuts-a-facebook-for-the-enterprise/ (accessed 15 June 2015).
- Roberts, N., Galluch, P.S., Dinger, M. and Grover, V. (2012). Absorptive Capacity and Information Systems Research: Review, synthesis, and directions for future research, MIS Quarterly 6(1): 25–40.Google Scholar
- Rui, H., Liu, Y. and Whinston, A.B. (2010). Chatter Matters: How Twitter can open the black box of online word-of-mouth, in International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). St. Louis, MO, USA, http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2010_submissions/204/.
- Sarker, S., Xiao, X. and Beaulieu, T. (2013). Qualitative Studies in Information Systems: A critical review and some guiding principles, MIS Quarterly 37(4): iii–xviii.Google Scholar
- Schilling, M.A. (2013). Strategic Management of Technological Innovation (4e), Irwin, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Schlagwein, D., Schoder, D. and Fischbach, K. (2011). Social Information Systems: Framework, review, and research agenda, in International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Shanghai, China, http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/proceedings/onlinecommunity/33/.
- Silverman, D. (2011). Interpreting Qualitative Data (4e), London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A.L. and Corbin, J.M. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2e), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- The Economist (2010). Special Report: Social Networking, 28 January 2010.Google Scholar
- Treem, J.W. and Leonardi, P.M. (2012). Social Media Use in Organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association, Communication Yearbook 36(1): 143–189.Google Scholar
- Wagner, C. (2004). Wiki: A technology for conversational knowledge management and group collaboration, Communications of the Association for Information Systems 13(1): 265–289.Google Scholar
- Webster, J. and Watson, R.T. (2002). Analysing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a literature review, MIS Quarterly 26(2): 13–23.Google Scholar
- Weick, K.E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.Google Scholar