Advertisement

Bilateral Intergenerational Moral Hazard: Empirical Evidence from China

  • Xian Xu
  • Peter Zweifel
Original Article

Abstract

Bilateral intergenerational moral hazard (BIMH) has been considered as one of the most important reasons for the sluggish development of private long-term care (LTC) insurance. On the one hand, the parent, who relies on child effort to avoid admission to the nursing home, may abstain from purchasing LTC insurance. On the other hand, buying LTC insurance coverage serves to protect the available bequest from the cost of LTC, thus weakening child interest in providing informal care as a substitute for formal LTC. In this paper, we investigate whether BIMH with respect to LTC exists in China. A survey conducted in October 2012 in Shanghai suggests that respondents may well exhibit BIMH as predicted by Courbage and Zweifel. However, contrary to their predictions, neither a decrease in parental wealth nor a decrease in the child’s expected inheritance are found to trigger net BIMH effects. These findings have important implications both for insurance companies planning to develop LTC products and for Chinese public policy concerning LTC.

Keywords

intergenerational moral hazard long-term care insurance economics of the family China 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Li Wang (Fudan University) and Yu Shen (Southwestern University of Finance and Economics) for useful discussions. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable and constructive comments. We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation.

References

  1. Brown, J.R. and Finkelstein, A. (2007) ‘Why is the market for long-term care insurance so small?’ Journal of Public Economics 91 (10): 1967–1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council (2014) ‘China urbanization plan 2014–2020’, from http://www.scio.gov.cn/ztk/xwfb/2014/30634/30639/Document/1366872/1366872.htm, accessed 20 May 2014.
  3. Cohen-Mansfield, J. and Wirtz, P.W. (2007) ‘Characteristics of adult day care participants who enter the nursing home’, Psychology and Aging 22 (2): 354–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Courbage, C. and Roudaut, N. (2008) ‘Empirical evidence of long-term care insurance purchase in France’, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice 33 (4): 645–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Courbage, C. and Zweifel, P. (2011) ‘Two-sided intergenerational moral hazard, long-term care insurance, and nursing home use’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 43 (1): 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doerpinghaus, H.I. and Gustavson, S.G. (2002) ‘Long-term care insurance purchase patterns’, Risk Management and Insurance Review 5 (1): 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaugler, J.E, Yu, F., Krichbaum, K. and Wyman, J.F. (2009) ‘Predictors of nursing home admission for persons with dementia’, Medical Care 47 (2): 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jiang, C. and Zhao, X. (2012) ‘An analysis of the opportunity cost of elderly care in China’, Management World 10: 80–87.Google Scholar
  9. Luo, Y., Xu, F. and Niu, H. (2012) ‘The development of long-term care insurance in China’, Shanghai Insurance 2012 (1): 15–26.Google Scholar
  10. Office of the Chinese National Committee on Aging (2006) Forecast for Aging Population Trends in China, Beijing: Office of the Chinese National Committee on Aging.Google Scholar
  11. Pauly, M.V. (1990) ‘The rational nonpurchase of long-term care insurance’, Journal of Political Economy 98 (1): 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. People’s Bank of China (2012) Report on the Chinese Regional Financial Market 2011, Beijing: People’s Bank of China.Google Scholar
  13. Schoder, J. and Zweifel, P. (2011) ‘Flat-of-the-curve medicine: A new perspective on the production of health’, Health Economics Review 1 (2): 1–10.Google Scholar
  14. Shanghai Bureau of Statistics (2012) Shanghai Statistical Yearbook 2012, Shanghai: Shanghai Bureau of Statistics Press.Google Scholar
  15. Sloan, F.A. and Norton, E.C. (1997) ‘Adverse selection, bequests, crowding out, and private demand for insurance: Evidence from the long-term care insurance market’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 15 (3): 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. United Nations (2011) World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision, New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  17. Wu, X.Y. (2009) ‘An empirical study on the unbalance development of China’s insurance industry across provinces: 1997–2007’, The Journal of Quantitative and Technical Economics 2009 (6): 99–114.Google Scholar
  18. Xu, J. and Feng, X. (2011) ‘The analysis of pension problem of China’s first generation of the one-child family’, Population & Economics 188 (5): 55–62.Google Scholar
  19. Xu, X. (2011) ‘Aufbruch der sozialversicherung in China’, Wege in der Sozialversicherung 2011 (5): 131–134.Google Scholar
  20. Xu, X. and Wei, Y.H. (2013) ‘The impacts of the regional economic development on the Chinese insurance industry—Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data’, Shanghai Insurance 2013 (6): 5–16.Google Scholar
  21. Zhang, Y., Luo, B. and Han, B. (2010) ‘Reverse support and the construction of old-age security research’, Theory Horizon 448 (12): 184–185.Google Scholar
  22. Zhu, M. and Jia, Q. (2009) ‘The analysis of demand for long term care and its insurance system constructing in China’, Chinese Journal of Health Policy 7 (2): 32–38.Google Scholar
  23. Zweifel, P. and Strüwe, W. (1996) ‘Long-term care insurance and bequests as instruments for shaping intergenerational relationships’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 12 (1): 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zweifel, P. and Strüwe, W. (1998) ‘Long-term care insurance in a two-generation model’, Journal of Risk and Insurance 65 (1): 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xian Xu
    • 1
  • Peter Zweifel
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Economics, Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations