Skip to main content
Log in

Factors influencing the length of hospitalisation in intensive care units: a prospective observational study

  • Published:
Pharmacy World and Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction: The length of stay (LOS) in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) is influenced by the clinical history of the patient, so the main factors affecting clinical outcome are logicalcandidates to be predictors of LOS. Since there is still limited information about which factors can influence LOS in these patients, we undertook this observational study in Italian hospitals.

Materials and methods: From 1 August to 31 October 2001 we enrolled a maximum of 10 consecutive patients admitted to ICUs in 16 Italian hospitals. The following information was recorded from each patient: date of admission; APACHE II score on admission; active sepsis and/or septic shock on admission; sepsis and/or septic shock developed during the stay in ICU; Glasgow coma scale on the third day; date and clinical outcome upon discharge from the hospital (alive or dead).

Results: In the study 131 patients were enrolled; 31 (23.7%) had active sepsis upon admission to ICU and 10 (7.6%) had septic shock; 12 (9.2%) developed sepsis during hospitalization and 12 (9.2%) developed septic shock. At the end of the study, 101 patients were alive and 30 had died. The overall mean LOS was 12 days. The mean LOS was 18.3 days for the subgroup with sepsis and 8.3 days in the subgroup without sepsis. Sepsis was the only factor that significantly influenced the LOS (P = 0.016).

Conclusions: Our study was aimed to analyse the factors that influence the LOS in ICU patients and found that among the variables that affected LOS, sepsis had the greatest impact. Other studies had evaluated the impact of some variables on LOS and identified sepsis and infection as a determinant prolonging LOS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13: 818–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Digiovine B, Chenoweth C, Watts C, Higgins M. The attributable mortality and costs of primary nosocomial bloodstream infec-tions in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 160: 976–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Girou E, Stephan F, Novara A, Safar M, Fagon JY. Risk factors and outcome of nosocomial infections: results of a matched case-control study of ICU patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157(Pt 1): 1151–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pittet D, Tarara D, Wenzel RP. Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and at-tributable mortality. JAMA 1994; 271: 1598–601

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eisele B, Lamy M, Thijs LG, Keinecke HO, Schuster HP, Matthias FR et al. Antithrombin III in patients with severe sepsis. A rand-omized, placebo-controlled, double-blind multicenter trial plus a meta-analysis on all randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials with antithrombin III in severe sepsis. Intens Care Med 1998; 24: 663–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pitimana-aree S, Forrest D, Brown G, Anis A, Wang XH, Dodek P. Implementation of a clinical practice guideline for stress ulcer prophylaxis increases appropriateness and decreases cost of care. Intens Care Med 1998; 24: 217–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR. The risk of determining risk with multivariable models. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 201–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Messori A, Trippoli S, Vaiani M, Gorini M, Corrado A. Bleeding and pneumonia in intensive care patients given ranitidine and sucralfate for prevention of stress ulcer: meta-analysis of ran-domised controlled trials. BMJ 2000; 321: 1103–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abraham E, Matthay MA, Dinarello CA, Vincent JT, Cohen J, Opal SM et al. Consensus conference definitions for sepsis, sep-tic shock, acute lung injury, and acute respiratory distress syn-drome: time for a reevaluation. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 232–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fagon JY, Chastre J, Vuagnat A, Gibert G. Nosocomial pneumo-nia and mortality among patients in intensive care units. JAMA 1996; 275: 866–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cook DJ, Reeve BK, Guyatt GH, Heyland DK, Griffith LE, Buck-ingham L et al. Stress c in critically ill patients. Resolving discord-ant meta-analyses. JAMA 1996; 275: 308–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

c/o Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi

c/o Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi

c/o Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi

c/o Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi

c/o Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi

c/o Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi

c/o Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vacca, F., Vaiani, M., Messori, A. et al. Factors influencing the length of hospitalisation in intensive care units: a prospective observational study. Pharm World Sci 26, 263–267 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHAR.0000042880.12835.4e

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHAR.0000042880.12835.4e

Navigation