Advertisement

Human Cervical Mucus Can Act in Vitro as a Selective Barrier Against Spermatozoa Carrying Fragmented DNA and Chromatin Structural Abnormalities

  • P.G. Bianchi
  • A. De Agostini
  • J. Fournier
  • C. Guidetti
  • N. Tarozzi
  • D. Bizzaro
  • G.C. Manicardi
Article

Abstract

Purpose: We have carried out experiments to determine if human cervical mucus can act as an in vitro selective barrier against spermatozoa morphologically normal that carry genetic structural abnormalities.

Methods: Sperm chromatin abnormalities have been evaluated by Chromomycin A3 and “endogenous” nick translation.

Results: The data obtained have shown that spermatozoa possessing higher levels of DNA protamination are more proficient in crossing the cervical mucus barrier. Moreover, the levels of positivity to endogenous nick translation treatment was practically zero in such spermatozoa.

Conclusions: We suggest that sperm penetration of cervical mucus could be used to select sperm preparations free of fragmented DNA or chromatin structural abnormalities for assisted reproduction.

Chromatin abnormalities Chromomycin A3 human cervical mucus in situ nick translation spermatozoa 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barrat, CLR, Osborn, JC, Harrison, PE, Monks, N, Dumphy, BC, Lenton, EA, Cooke, ID: The hypo-osmotic swelling test and sperm mucus penetration test in determining fertilization of the human oocyte. Hum Reprod 1989;4:430-434Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eggert-Kruse, W, Schwarz, H, Rohr, G, Demirakca, T, Tilgen, W, Runnebaum, B: Sperm morphology assessment using strict criteria and male fertility under in-vivo conditions of conception. Hum Reprod 1996;11:139-146Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abu-Heija, AT, Fleming, R, Jamieson, ME, Yates, RW, Coutts, JR: The predictive value of the sperm-cervical mucus interaction test on the outcome of in vitro fertilization and ovulation induction combined with intrauterine insemination. Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol 1997;37:232-234Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baker, HW, Clarke, GN, Hudson, B, McBain, J-C, McGowan, MP, Pepperell, RJ: Treatment of sperm autoimmunity in men. Clin Reprod Fertil 1983;2:55-71Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Katz, DF, Overstreet, JW, Hanson, FW: A new quantitative test for sperm penetration into cervical mucus. Fertil Steril 1980;33:179-186Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Katz, DF, Morales, P, Samuels, SJ, Overstreet, JW: Mechanisms of filtration of morphologically abnormal human sperm by cervical mucus. Fertil Steril 1990;54:513-516Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Katz, DF: Human cervical mucus: Research update. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:1984-1986Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aitken, RJ, Sutton, M, Warner, P, Richardson, DW: Relationship between the movement characteristics of human spermatozoa and their ability to penetrate cervical mucus and zona-free hamster oocytes. J Reprod Fertil 1985;73:441-449Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eggert-Kruse, W, Reimann-Andersen, J, Rohr, G, Pohl, S, Tilgen, W, Runnebaum, B: Clinical relevance of sperm morphology assessment using strict criteria and relationship with sperm-mucus interaction in vivo and in vitro. Fertil Steril 1995;63:612-624Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clarke, GN: A simplified quantitative cervical mucus penetration test. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1184-1187Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clarke, GN, Garrett, C, Baker, HW: Quantitative sperm mucus penetration: Modified formulae for calculating penetration efficiency. Hum Reprod 1998;13:1255-1259Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Evenson, DP, Darzynkiewicz, Z, Melamed, MR: Relation of mammalian sperm chromatin heterogeneity to fertility. Science 1980;210:1131-1133Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Evenson, DP, Jost, LK, Marshall, D, Zinaman, MJ, Clegg, E, Purvis, K, de Angelis, P, Claussen, OP: Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod 1999;3:1039-1049Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bianchi, PG, Manicardi, GC, Bizzaro, D, Bianchi, U, Sakkas, D: Effect of deoxyribonucleic acid protamination on fluorochrome staining and in situ nick translation of murine and human nature spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 1993;49:1083-1088Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Manicardi, GC, Bianchi, PG, Pantano, S, Azzoni, P, Bizzaro, D, Bianchi, U, Sakkas, D: Presence of endogenous nicks in DNA of ejaculated human spermatozoa and its relationship to Chromomycin A3 accessibility. Biol Reprod 1995;52:864-867Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Manicardi, GC, Tombacco, A, Bizzaro, D, Bianchi, U, Bianchi, PG, Sakkas, D: DNA strand breaks in ejaculated human spermatozoa: Comparison of susceptibility to the nick translation and terminal transferase assays. Histochem J 1998;30:33-39Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sakkas, D, Urner, F, Bianchi, PG, Bizzaro, D, Wagner, I, Jaquenoud, N, Manicardi, GC, Campana, A: Sperm chromatin abnormalities can influence decondensation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1996;11:837-843Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sakkas, D, Urner, F, Bizzaro, D, Bianchi, PG, Manicardi, GC, Shoukir, Y, Campana, A: Sperm nuclear DNA damage and altered chromatin structure: Effect on fertilization and embryo development. Hum Reprod 1998;4(Suppl):11-19Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Qiu, J, Hales, BF, Robaire, B: Damage to rat spermatozoal DNA after chronic cyclophosphamide exposure. Biol Reprod 1995;53:1465-1473Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Qiu, J, Hales, BF, Robaire, B: Effects of chronic low-dose cyclophosphamide exposure on the nuclei of rat spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 1995;52:33-40Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lopes, S, Sun, JG, Juriscova, A, Meriano, J, Casper, RF: Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation is increased in poor quality sperm samples and correlated with failed fertilization in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 1998;69:528-532Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bianchi, PG, Manicardi, GC, Bizzaro, D, Campana, A, Bianchi, U, Sakkas, D: Use of the guanine-cytosine (GC) specific fluorochrome Chromomycin A3, as an indicator of poor sperm morphology. J Assist Reprod Genet 1996;13:246-250Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bizzaro, D, Manicardi, GC, Bianchi, PG, Bianchi, U, Mariethoz, E, Sakkas, D: In situ competition between protamine and fluorochromes for sperm DNA. Mol Hum Reprod 1998;4:127-132Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gao, X, Patel, DJ: Chromomycin dimer-DNA oligomer complex. Sequence selectivity and divalent cation specificity. Biochemistry 1990;29:10940-10956Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gao, X, Mirau, P, Patel, DJ: Structure refinement of the chromomycin dimer-DNA oligomer complex in solution. J Mol Biol 1992;223:259-279Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goodsell, DS, Kopka, ML, Cascio, D, Dickerson, RE: Crystal structure of CATGGCCATG and its implication for A-tract bending models. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90:2930-2934Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moghissi, KS, Lyner, FN: Studies in the human cervical mucus: Mucoids and their relation to sperm penetration. Fertil Steril 1970;21:234-239Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barros, C, Vigil, P, Herrera, E, Guadarrama, A, Bustos-Obregon, E: In vitro interaction between human spermatozoa and human cervical mucus. Micr Elect Biol Cell 1983;7:13-19Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vigil, P, Valdez, E: Bases cientìficas de la planificaciòn natural de la familia. Actual Ginec Obstet 1989;3:59-67Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vigil, P, Perez, A, Neira, J, Morales, P: Post-partum cervical mucus: Biological and rheological properties. Hum Reprod 1991;6:475-479Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fredricsson, B, Björk, G: Morphology of postcoital spermatozoa in the cervical secretion and its clinical significance. Fertil Steril 1977;28:841-845Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hanson, FW, Overstreet, JW: The interaction of human spermatozoa with cervical mucus in vivo. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 1981;140:173-178Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Foresta, C, Zorzi, M, Rossato, M, Varotto, A: Sperm nuclear instability and staining with aniline blue: Abnormal persistence of histones in spermatozoa in infertile men. Int J Androl 1992;15:330-337Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bianchi, PG, Manicardi, GC, Urner, F, Campana, A, Sakkas, D: Chromatin packaging and morphology in ejaculated human spermatozoa: Evidence of hidden anomalies in normal spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod 1996;2:139-144Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hughes, CM, Lewis, SEM, McClavey-Martin, VJ, Tomphson, W: The effect of antioxidant supplementation during Percol preparation on human sperm DNA integrity. Mol HumReport 1998;13:1240-1247.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • P.G. Bianchi
    • 1
  • A. De Agostini
    • 1
  • J. Fournier
    • 1
  • C. Guidetti
    • 2
  • N. Tarozzi
    • 1
  • D. Bizzaro
    • 3
  • G.C. Manicardi
    • 2
  1. 1.Clinic of Sterility, Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyUniversity Hospital of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Scienze AgrarieUniversità di Modena e Reggio EmiliaReggio EmiliaItaly
  3. 3.Istituto di Biologia e GeneticaUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly

Personalised recommendations