This study examines sexual harassment (SH) whichinvolves members of the same gender, either male orfemale. Data are taken from the 1988 Department ofDefense Survey of Sex Roles in the Active Duty Military. Separate comparisons for male (38% White, 31%Black, and 31% ‘other’) and female (48%White, 27% Black, and 25% ‘other’) targetsare made between sameand other-gender SH related to fourmajor components of a conceptual model proposed by Fitzgerald,Drasgow, Hulin, Gelfand, & Magley (1997). Thesecomponents include sexual harassment behaviors, personalvulnerability, target response styles, and consequences of the SH for the target. The sexualorientation of targets and perpetrators is notconsidered because data were unavailable. Results reveala number of meaningful differences between sameandother-gender SH. The most striking result is that maletargets of same-gender SH experience consequences thatare significantly more pervasive and severe than thoseexperienced by male targets of other-gender SH.Organizational implications are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Backman, E. L., & Backman, L. R. (1997). Sexual harassment and rape: A view from higher education. In R. Levant & G. Brooks (Eds.), Men and sex: New psychological perspectives. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Baier, J. L., & Williams, P. S. (1983). Fraternity hazing: Current alumni and active member attitudes toward hazing. Journal of College Student Personnel, 24, 300–305.
Bargh, J. A., & Raymond, P. (1995). The naive misuse of power: Nonconscious sources of sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 85–96.
Berdahl, J. L., Magley, V. J., & Waldo, C. R. (1996). The sexual harassment of men? Exploring the concept with theory and data. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 527–547.
Bond, M. A. (1995). Prevention and the ecology of sexual harassment: Creating empowering climates. In C. Swift (Ed.), Sexual assault and abuse: Sociocultural context of prevention. New York: The Haworth Press.
Bridgeland, W. M., Duane, E. A., & Stewart, C. S. (1995). Sexual victimization among undergraduates. College Student Journal, 29, 16–25.
Calderwood, D. (1987). The male rape victim. Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality, 21, 53–55.
Cleveland, J., & Kerst, M. (1993). Sexual harassment and perceptions of power: An underarticulated relationship. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 49–67.
D'Augelli, A. R. (1989). Lesbian's and gay men's experiences of discrimination and harassment in a university community. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 317–321.
Eisenhart, R. W. (1975). You can't hack it little girl: A discussion of the covert psychological agenda of modern combat training. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 13–23.
Faley, R. H., Knapp, D. E., & Kustis, G. A. (1998). Estimating the organizational costs of sexual harassment: The case of the U.S. Army. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 1–27.
Farley, L. (1978). Sexual shakedown: the sexual harassment of women on the job. London: Melbourne House; New York: McGraw Hill.
Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: a test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578–589.
Fitzgerald, L. F., & Schullman, S. L. (1993). Sexual harassment: A research analysis and agenda for the 1990s. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 5–27.
Frazier, P. A. (1993). A comparative study of male and female rape victims seen at a hospital-based rape crisis program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 64–76.
Garnets, L., Herek, G. M., & Levy, B. (1990). Violence and victimization of lesbians and gay men: Mental health consequences. [Special Issue: Violence against Lesbians and Gay Men: Issues for Research, Practice, and Policy.] Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 366–383.
Goyer, P. F., & Eddleman, H. C. (1984). Same sex rape of non-incarcerated men. American Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 576–579.
Groth, A. N., & Burgess, A. W. (1980). Male rape: Offenders and victims. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 806–810.
Gutek, B. A., Morasch, B., & Cohen, A. G. (1983). Interpreting social-sexual behavior in a work setting. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 22, 30–48.
Gutek, B. A., Nakamura, C. Y., Gahart, M., Handschumacher, I., & Russell, D. (1980). Sexuality in the workplace. Basic and Applied Psychology, 1, 255–265.
Hickson, F. C. I., Davies, P. M., Hunt, A. J., Weatherburn, P., McManus, T. J., & Coxon, A. P. M. (1994). Gay men as victims of nonconsensual sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 281–294.
Kaufman, A., Divasto, P., Jackson, R., Voorhees, D., & Christy, J. (1980). Male rape victims: Noninstitutionalized assault. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 221–223.
Martindale, M. (1988). Sexual harassment in the military: 1988. Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
McKinney, K. (1994). Sexual harassment and college faculty members. Deviant Behavior, 15, 171–191.
Miller, L. L. (1997). Not just weapons of the weak: Gender harassment as a form of protest for army men. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 32–51.
Niebuhr, R. E. (1997). Sexual harassment in the military. In W. O'Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 118 S. Ct. 998 (1998).
Popovich, P. M., Gehlauf, J. A., Jolton, J. A., Somers, J. M., & Godinho, R. M. (1992). Perceptions of sexual harassment as a function of sex of rater and incident form and consequence. Sex Roles, 27, 609–625.
Pryor, J. B., & Stoller, L. M. (1994). Sexual cognition processes in men who are high in the likelihood to sexually harass. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 163–169.
Pryor, J. B., & Whalen, N. J. (1997). A typology of sexual harassment: Characteristics of harassers and the social circumstances under which sexual harassment occurs. In W. O'Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Schneider, B. E. (1982). Consciousness about sexual harassment among heterosexual and lesbian women workers. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 75–98.
Tangri, S. S., Burt, M. R., & Johnson, L. B. (1982). Sexual harassment at work: Three explanatory models. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 33–54.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1981). Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: Is it a problem? Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1988). Sexual harassment in the federal government: An update. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1995). Sexual harassment in the federal government: Trends, progress, continuing challenges. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Waldo, C. R., Berdahl, J. L., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1998). Are men sexually harassed? If so, by whom? Law and Human Behavior, 22, 59–79.
Waterman, C. K., Dawson, L. J., & Bologna, M. J. (1989). Sexual coercion in gay male and lesbian relationships: Predictors and implications for support services. The Journal of Sex Research, 26, 118–124.
About this article
Cite this article
Dubois, C.L.Z., Knapp, D.E., Faley, R.H. et al. An Empirical Examination of Same- and Other-Gender Sexual Harassment in the Workplace. Sex Roles 39, 731–749 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018860101629
- Social Psychology
- Conceptual Model
- Sexual Harassment
- Meaningful Difference
- Experience Consequence