We explore Ernst von Glaserfeld‘s radical constructivism, its criticisms, and our own thoughts on what it promises for the reform of science and mathematics teaching. Our investigation reveals that many criticisms of radical constructivism are unwarranted; nevertheless, in its current cognitivist form radical constructivism may be insufficient to empower teachers to overcome objectivist cultural traditions. Teachers need to be empowered with rich understandings of philosophies of science and mathematics that endorse relativist epistemologies; for without such they are unlikely to be prepared to reconstruct their pedagogical practices. More importantly, however, is a need for a powerful social epistemology to serve as a referent for regenerating the culture of science education. We recommend blending radical constructivism with Habermas‘ ’theory of communicative action‘ to provide science teachers with a moral imperative for adopting a constructivist epistemology.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Baker, D. & Taylor, P.C.S: 1995, ‘The Effect of Culture on the Learning of Science in Non Western Countries: The Results of an Integrated Research Review’, International Journal of Science Education 17, 695–704.
Barthes, R.: 1985, Mythologies, Hill and Wang, New York.
Cobb, P.: 1994, ‘Where is the Mind? Constructivist and Socio-cultural Perspectives on Mathematical Development’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Oreleans, LA, April.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yaekel, E.: 1993, ‘Discourse, Mathematical Thinking, and Classroom Practice’, in N. Minick, E. Foreman and A. Stone (eds.), Contexts for Learning: Socioculural dynamics in children's development (pp. 91–119). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Contrey, J.: 1995, ‘How Compatible are Radical Constructivism, Social cultural Approaches and Social Constructivism?’. in L. Steffe and J. Gale (eds.), Constructivism in Education (pp. 185–226), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersy.
Driver, R.: 1995, ‘Constructivist Approaches to Science Teaching’, in L. Steffe and J. Gale (eds.), Constructivism in Education (pp. 385–400). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Driver, R., & Erickson, G. 1983, ‘Theories-in-action: Some Theoretical and Empirical Issues in the Study of Students' Conceptual Frameworks’, Studies in Science Education 10, 37–60.
Duit, R.: 1995, ‘The Constructivist View: A Fashionable and Fruitful Paradigm for Science Education Research and Practice’, in L. Steffe and J. Gale (eds.), Constructivism in Education (pp. 271–285), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Ellerton, N.F. & Clements, M.A.: 1992, ‘Some Pluses and Minuscs of Radical Constructivism in Mathematics Education’, Mathematics Education Research Journal 4(2), 1–22.
Ernest, P.: 1991, The Philosophy Of Mathematics Education, The Falmer Press, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Ernest, P.: 1993, ‘Constructivism, the Psychology of Learning and the Nature of Matheman ics Some Critical Issues’, Science & Education 1(1), 87–93.
Feyerabend, P.: 1975, Against Method, London: Verso.
Habermas, J.: 1972, Knowledge and Human Interests, Heinemann Educational Books Ltd., London.
Hardy, M.: 1996, An Investigation of Two Middle School Mathematics Teachers Constructions of Constraining and Sustaining Experiences. Unpublished dissertation, The Florida State University.
Johnson, M.: 1987, The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Kliue, M.: 1982, Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty, Oxford University Press, New York.
Kuhn, T.S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lerman, S.: 1993, The ‘Problem’ of Intersubjectivity in Mathematics Learning: Expansion or Rejection of the Constructivist Paradigm?, Unpublished manuscript.
Malinowski, B.: 1944, A Scientific Theory of Culture and Other Essays, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, N.C.
McCarthy, T.: 1985, The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachussetts.
Milne, C. & Taylor, P.C.: 1995a, ‘Metaphors as Global Markers for Teachers' Beliefs about the Nature of Science’, Research in Science Education, 25, 39–49.
Milne, C. & Taylor, P.C.: 1995b, ‘Practical Activities Don't Talk to Students: Deconstructing a Mythology of School Science’, Paper presented at the Third International History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching Conference, Minneapolis, Oct-Nov.
Pusey, M.: 1987, Jurgen Habermas, London: Tavistock.
Strike, K.A.: 1987, ‘Toward A Coherent Constructivism’, Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics 1, 481–489.
Suchting, W.A.: 1992, ‘Constructivism Deconstructed’, Science & Education 1(3), 223–254.
Taylor, P.C.: 1993, ‘Collaborating to Reconstruct Teaching: The Influence of Researcher Beliefs’, in K. Tobin (ed.), The Practice Of Constructivism in Science Education (pp. 267–298). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Taylor, P.C.: ‘Mythmaking and Mythbreaking in The Mathematics Classroom’, Educational Studies in Mathematics, in press
Taylor, P.C. & Dawson, V.: ‘Critical Reflections on a Student-Supervisor Relationship in Action Research, in W. Atway, J. Malone and J. Northfield (eds.), The Practice of Research Supervision in Science and Mathematics Education, The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Press, in press
Toulmin, S.: 1972, Human Understanding, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Tymoczco, T.: 1986, New Directions in the Philosophy of Mathematics: An Anthology, Birkhauser, Boston.
von Glasersfeld, E.: 1971, ‘Reading, Understanding, and Conceptual Situations’, Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Tampa, Florida (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 061 010).
von Glasersfeld, E.: 1974, ‘Signs, Communication, and Language’, Journal of Human Evolution, 3, 465–474.
von Glasersfeld, E.: 1976, ‘The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 213–226.
von Glasersfeld, E.: 1981, ‘The Concepts of Adaptation and Viability in a Radical Constructivist Theory of Knowledge’, in L.E. Stegel, D.M. Brodzinsky and R.M. Golinkorr (eds.), New Directions in Piagetian Theory and Practice, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
von Glasersfeld, E.: 1984, ‘An Introduction to Radical Constructivism’, in Paul Watzlawik (ed.), The Invented Reality (pp. 1–29). Norton, New York (Reprinted from Die Erfindung der Wirklichkeit. Piper, Munich, 1981).
von Glasersfeld, E.: 1986, ‘Steps in the Construction of Others and Reality: A Study in Self-Regulation’, in R. Trappl (ed.), Power Autonomy, Uwpia: New Approaches Towant Comples Systems (pp. 107–116). Plenum Press, New York.
von Glasersfeld, E.: 1987, ‘Learning as Constructive Activity’, in The Construction in Knowledge Contributions to Conceptual Semantics (pp. 307–333). Intersystems Publications, Seaside, California.
von Glasersfeld, E.: 1989a, ‘Abstraction, Re-presentation, and Reflection, in Interpretation of Experience and Piaget's Approach’ (Report No. SRRI-209) National Science Foundation, Washington D.C. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 306 120, See also L. P. Steffe (ed.) Epistemological Foundations of Mathematical Experience, Spring-Verlag, New York, 1991).
von Glasersfeld, E.: 1989b, ‘Cognition, Construction of Knowledge and Teaching’, Synthese 80, 121–140 (see also ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 294–754).
von Glasersfeld, E.: 1989c, ‘Knowing without Metaphysics: Aspects of the Radical Constructivist Position’, Kitchener Waterloo Record, Kitchener, Ontario (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 304 344).
von Glasersfeld, F.: 1990, ‘Environment and Communication’, in L.P. Steffe & T. Wood (eds.), Transforming Children's Mathematics Education, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
von Glasersfeld, E.: 1991a, ‘An exposition of Constructivism: Why Some Like it Radical’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph 4, 19–29.
von Glasersfeld, E.: 1991b, ‘Introduction’, in E. von Glasersfeld (ed.), Radical Constructivism in Mathematics Education (pp. xiii–xx). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands.
von Glasersfeld, E.: 1992a, ‘Aspects of Radical Constructivism and its Educational Recommendations’, Paper presented at the 7th meeting of the International Congress of Mathematics Education, Quebec, Ontario.
von Glasersfeld, E.: 1992b, ‘Constructivism Reconstructed: A Reply to Suchting’, Science & Education 1(4), 379–384.
von Glasersfeld, E.: 1993, ‘Questions and Answers About Radical Constructivism’, in K. Tobin (ed.), The Practice Of Constructivism in Science Education (pp. 23–38). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
von Glasersfeld, E.: 1995, ‘A Constructivist Approach to Teaching’, in L. Steffe and J. Gale (eds.), Constructivism in Education (pp. 3–16), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Wheatley, G.: 1991, ‘Constructivist Perspectives on Science and Mathematics Learning’, Science Education 75, 9–21.
About this article
Cite this article
Hardy, M.D. Von Glaserfeld‘s Radical Constructivism: A Critical Review. Science & Education 6, 135–150 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008664626705
- Science Education
- Science Teacher
- Critical Review
- Mathematics Teaching
- Pedagogical Practice