Skip to main content
Log in

Quinolizidinyl derivatives of iminodibenzyl and phenothiazine as multidrug resistance modulators in ovarian cancer cells

  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of multidrug-resistance (MDR) in neoplastic cells is often responsible for the therapy failure and poor outcome of a number of human cancers. MDR may be associated with the expression of the multidrug transporter glycoprotein p170, encoded by the MDR1 gene, which acts as an ATP-dependent efflux pump by reducing the intracellular accumulation of some cytotoxic agents. A variety of iminodibenzyl and phenothiazine derivatives, characterized by the presence of a bicyclic, strongly basic, and highly lipophilic quinolizidine nucleus, were synthesized to investigate their ability to modulate the MDR phenotype. A set of 10 of them (named 110), bearing quinolizidine moiety linked through different connecting chains, were tested as chemoresistance-reversing agents on doxorubicin-resistant ovarian cancer cells (A2780-DX3). A 51-fold resistance to doxorubicin was reported in the A2780-DX3 compared to the parental sensitive A2780 WT with mean IC50 values of 0.02 and 1.02 μM, respectively. Moreover, overexpression of the glycoprotein p170 in the resistant cell line was detected by Western blot analysis. By cytotoxicity assays and time-course experiments, different treatment schedules with resistance modulators (including clomipramine as reference drug) and doxorubicin were taken into account. The 16 h exposure of cells to 1 μM of modulator before doxorubicin demonstrated to be superior in sensitizing the resistant cell line. In particular, compounds 8, 7, 10, and 4 increasingly potentiated doxorubicin cytotoxicity, up to 5.6-fold in A2780-DX3 cells. The present results suggest promising indications for further development of these compounds as chemosensitizing drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ford JM, Hait WN: Pharmacology of drugs that alter multidrug resistance in cancer. Pharmacol Rev 42: 155–199, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ling V: Multidrug resistance: molecular mechanisms and clinical relevance. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 40(suppl.): S3–S8, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sikic BJ, Fisher GA, Lum BL, Halsey J, Beketic-Oreskovic L, Chen G: Modulation and prevention of multidrug resistance by inhibitors of P-glycoprotein. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 40(suppl.): S13–S19, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  4. Geney R, Ungureanu M, Li D, Ojima I: Overcoming multidrug resistance in taxane chemotherapy. Clin Chem Lab Med 40: 918–925, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wiese M, Pajeva IK: Structure-activity relationship of multidrug resistance reversers. Curr Med Chem 8: 685–713, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  6. Teodori E, Dei S, Scapecchi S, Gualtieri F: The medicinal chemistry of multidrug resistance (MDR) reversing drugs. Farmaco 57: 385–415, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ford MJ, Prozialeck WC, Hait WN: Structural features determining activity of phenothiazines and related drugs for inhibition of cell growth and reversal of multidrug resistance. Mol Pharmacol 35: 105–115, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ford JM, Bruggeman EP, Pastan I, Gottesman MM, Hait WN: Cellular and biochemical characterization of thioxanthenes for reversal of multidrug resistance in human and murine cell lines. Cancer Res 50: 1748–1756, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ramu A, Ramu N: Reversal of multidrug resistance by phenothiazines and structurally related compounds. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 30: 165–173, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pajeva IK, Wiese M: QSAR and molecular modelling of catamphiphilic drugs able to modulate multidrug resistance in tumors. Quant Struct Act Relat 16: 1–10, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pajeva IK, Wiese M: Molecular modeling of phenothiazines and related drugs as multidrug resistance modifier: a comparative molecular field analysis study. J Med Chem 41: 1815–1826, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sparatore F, Boido V: Derivati di amminoalcoli e diammine naturali di interesse farmacologico. Nota III. Sintesi di derivati lupinilici di sistemi eterociclici trianellari. Ann Chim 54: 591–601, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boido V, Sparatore A: Chinolizidinil derivati di sistemi triciclici. Farmaco 37: 63–73, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sparatore A, Sparatore F: Preparation and pharmacological activities of 10–homolupinanoyl-2–R-phenothiazines. Farmaco 49: 5–17, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  15. Novelli F, Sparatore A, Tasso B, Sparatore F: Quinolizidinyl derivatives of 5,11–dihydro-6H-pyrido(2,3–b(-(1,4( benzodiazepin-6–one as ligands for muscarinic receptors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 9: 3031–3034, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tasso B, Sparatore A, Sparatore F: N-Homolupinanoyl-and N-(ω-lupinylthio)alkanoyl derivatives of some tricyclic systems as ligands for muscarinic M1 and M2 receptor subtypes. Farmaco, in press, 2003

  17. Mazzoni A, Trave F: Cytoplasmic membrane cholesterol and doxorubicin cytotoxicity in drug-sensitive and multidrug-resistant human ovarian cancer cells. Oncol Res 5: 75–82, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  18. Häfliger F, Schindler W: N-Acyl derivatives of iminodibenzyl. US2, 666,051. Chem Abstr 49: 9041f, 1955

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ekstrand T: Phenothiazine derivatives of pharmacological interest. Acta Chem Scand 3: 302–303, 1949

    Google Scholar 

  20. Société des usines chimiques Rhone-Poulenc. Phenothiazine derivatives. Brit 740, 932. Chem Abstr 51: 500i, 1957

  21. Kazutoshi F, Atsuo S, Kazuo S, Kazuo O: 10–Chloroacetyl phenothiazine. Japan 74 29,19. Chem Abstr 82: 140161w, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  22. Toldy L, Toth I, Fekete M, Borsy J: Phenothiazine derivatives. VI. Experiments for the preparation of phenothiazines with selective coronary dilator activity. Acta Chim Acad Sci Hung 44: 301–325, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  23. Novelli F, Sparatore F: Thiolupinine and some derivatives of pharmacological interest. Farmaco 48: 1021–1049, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  24. Domenjoz R, Theobald W: Pharmacologie des Tofranil (N-(3–dymethylaminopropyl)-iminodibenzyl hydrochloride). Arch Int Pharmacodyn 120: 450–489, 1959

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tobe A, Yoshida Y, Ikoma H, Tonomura S, Kikumoto R: Pharmacological evaluation of 2–(4–methylaminobuthoxy)diphenylmethane hydrochloride, a new psychotropic drug with antidepressant activity. Arzneim Forsch 31: 1278–1285, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  26. Guan J, Kyle DE, Gerena L, Zhang Q, Milhous WK, Lin AJ: Design, synthesis and evaluation of new chemosensitizers in multi-drug resistant Plasmodium falciparum. J Med Chem 45: 2741–2748, 2002

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barbieri, F., Alama, A., Tasso, B. et al. Quinolizidinyl derivatives of iminodibenzyl and phenothiazine as multidrug resistance modulators in ovarian cancer cells. Invest New Drugs 21, 413–420 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026295017158

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026295017158

Navigation