Abstract
We show that three fundamental information-theoretic constraints—the impossibility of superluminal information transfer between two physical systems by performing measurements on one of them, the impossibility of broadcasting the information contained in an unknown physical state, and the impossibility of unconditionally secure bit commitment—suffice to entail that the observables and state space of a physical theory are quantum-mechanical. We demonstrate the converse derivation in part, and consider the implications of alternative answers to a remaining open question about nonlocality and bit commitment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, “Experimental tests of Bell's inequalities using time-varying analyzers”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804–1807 (1982).
A. Arageorgis, J. Earman, and L. Ruetsche, “Weyling the time away: The non-unitary implementability of quantum field dynamics on curved space-time”, Stud. Hist. Philos. Modern Phys. 33, 151–184 (2002).
G. Bacciagaluppi, “Separation theorems and Bell inequalities in algebraic quantum mechanics”, in Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1993: Quantum Measurement, Irreversibility and the Physics of Information, P. Busch, P. Lahti, and P. Mittelstaedt, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994), pp. 29–37.
H. Barnum, C. M. Caves, C. A. Fuchs, R. Jozsa, and B. Schumacher, “Non-commuting mixed states cannot be broadcast”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2318(1996).
C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, “Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing, ” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing, pp. 175–179, IEEE, 1984.
P. Bóna, “Extended quantum mechanics”, Acta Phys. Slovaca 50(1), 1–198 (2000).
G. Brassard, comments during discussion at meeting “Quantum foundations in the light of quantum information and cryptography, ” Montreal, May 17–19, 2000.
O. Bratteli and D. Robinson, Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics (Springer, New York, 1996).
J. Bub, “The quantum bit commitment theorem”, Found. Phys. 31, 735–756 (2001).
P. Busch and J. Singh, “Lüders' theorem for unsharp quantum measurements”, Phys. Lett. A 249, 10–12 (1998).
R. Clifton and H. Halvorson, “Entanglement and open systems in algebraic quantum field theory”, Stud. Hist. Philos. Modern Phys. 32, 1–31 (2001).
R. Clifton and H. Halvorson, “Are Rindler quanta real? Inequivalent particle concepts in quantum field theory”, Brit. J. Philos. Sci. 52, 417–470.
A. Connes, Noncommutative Geometry (Academic, San Diego, 1994).
D. Deutsch, “It from qubit, ” in Science and Ultimate Reality, J. Barrow, P. Davies, and C. Harper, eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003).
D. Dieks, “Communication by EPR devices”, Phys. Lett. A 92(6), 271–271 (1982).
R. Duvenhage, “Recurrence in quantum mechanics”, quant-ph/0202023.
R. Duvenhage, “The nature of information in quantum mechanics”, quant-ph/0203070.
A. Einstein, “What is the theory of relativity. ” First published in The Times, London, November 28, 1919, p. 13. Also published under the title “Time, space and gravitation”, in Optician, The British Optical Journal 58, 187–188 (1919).
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?” Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935).
A. Einstein, “Autobiographical notes”, in Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, (The Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. VII), P. A. Schilpp, ed. (Open Court, La Salle, IL, 1949).
G. Emch, Algebraic Methods in Statistical Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory (Wiley, New York, 1973).
M. Florig and S. Summers, “On the statistical independence of algebras of observables”, J. Math. Phys. 38, 1318–1328 (1997).
C. A. Fuchs, “Information gain vs. state disturbance in quantum theory”, Fortschr. Phys. 46(4, 5), 535–565. Reprinted in Quantum Computation: Where Do We Want to Go Tomorrow?, S. L. Braunstein, ed. (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1999), pp. 229–259.
C. A. Fuchs, “Just two nonorthogonal quantum states, ” in Quantum Communication, Computing, and Measurement 2, P. Kumar, G. M. D'Ariano, and O. Hirota, eds. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2000), pp. 11–16.
C. A. Fuchs and K. Jacobs, “An information tradeoff relation for finite-strength quantum measurements”, Phys. Rev. A 63, 062305(2001).
W. H. Furry, “A note on the quantum mechanical theory of measurement”, Phys. Rev. 49, 393–399 (1936).
N. Gisin, Helv. Phys. Acta 62, 363–371 (1989).
L. P. Hughston, R. Jozsa, and W. K. Wootters, “A complete classification of quantum ensembles having a given density matrix”, Phys. Lett. A 183, 14–18 (1993).
E. T. Jaynes, “Information theory and statistical mechanics II”, Phys. Rev. 108(2), 171–190 (1957).
R. Kadison and J. Ringrose, Fundamentals of the Theory of Operator Algebras (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1997).
B. O. Koopman, “Hamiltonian systems and transformations in Hilbert space”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 17, 315–318 (1931).
L. J. Landau, “On the violation of Bell's inequality in quantum theory”, Phys. Lett. A 120, 54–56 (1987).
L. J. Landau, “Experimental tests of distributivity”, Lett. Math. Phys. 25, 47–50 (1992).
N. Landsman, Mathematical Topics Between Classical and Quantum Mechanics (Springer, New York, 1998).
H.-K. Lo and H. F. Chau, “Is quantum bit commitment really possible?”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3410–3413 (1997).
D. Mauro, “On Koopman–von Neumann waves”, quant-ph/0105112.
D. Mayers, “Unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment is impossible”, in Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Physics and Computation (New England Complex System Institute, Boston, 1996), pp. 224–228.
D. Mayers, “Unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment is impossible”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3414–3417 (1997).
A. Petersen, “The philosophy of Niels Bohr”, B. Atom. Sci. 19(7), 8–14 (1963).
R. Powers and E. Størmer, “Free states of the canonical anticommutation relations”, Comm. Math. Phys. 16, 1–33 (1970).
J. Roberts and G. Roepstorff, “Some basic concepts of algebraic quantum theory”, Comm. Math. Phys. 11, 321–338 (1969).
H. Roos, “Independence of local algebras in quantum field theory”, Comm. Math. Phys. 16, 238–246 (1970).
E. Schrödinger, “Discussion of probability relations between separated systems”, Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 31, 555–563 (1935).
E. Schrödinger, “Probability relations between separated systems”, Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 32, 446–452 (1936).
I. Segal, “Postulates for general quantum mechanics”, Ann. Math. 48, 930–948 (1947).
S. Summers, “On the independence of local algebras in quantum field theory”, Rev. Math. Phys. 2, 201–247 (1990).
J. von Neumann, Ann. Math. 33, 587, 789 (1932).
W. K. Wootters and W. H. Zurek, “A single quantum cannot be cloned”, Nature 299, 802–803 (1982).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clifton, R., Bub, J. & Halvorson, H. Characterizing Quantum Theory in Terms of Information-Theoretic Constraints. Foundations of Physics 33, 1561–1591 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026056716397
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026056716397