Pharmacy World and Science

, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 203–206 | Cite as

Socio-economic differences in prescription and OTC drug use in Dutch adolescents

  • H. Tobi
  • W.M. Meijer
  • L.T.W. de Jong-van den Berg
  • J. Tuinstra


Objective: To detect whether there were socio‐economic differences in the overall use of prescription and OTC drugs among adolescents. Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of questionnaire data collected to investigate socio‐economic differences in health risk behaviour and decision‐making. Results: About 20% of the 741 girls and 10% of the 736 boys reported using at least one prescription drug in the past 14 days, oral contraceptives excluded. For OTC drugs these percentages were 45% and 24%, respectively. No statistically significant socio‐economic differences in prescription drug use could be detected. A higher socio‐economic status was associated with an increased OTC drug use, especially in boys. The odds of girls who reported medication was about twice that for boys, after adjusting for perceived health and socio‐economic status.Conclusion: There were socio‐economic differences with regard to OTC drug use. No socio‐economic differences in prescription medication use could be found. There were gender differences with respect to medication use in adolescence, regardless of perceived health and socio‐economic status.

Adolescent Drug‐utilisation Gender OTC drugs Prescription drugs Socio‐economic factors The Netherlands 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Abbotts J, Williams R, Ford G. Morbidity and Irish Catholic descent in Britain relating health disadvantage to socio-economic position. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52: 999–1005.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chandola T. Ethnic and class differences in health to British South Asians: using the new national statistics socio-economic classification. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52: 1285–96.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marmot M, Bobak M. International comparators and poverty and health in Europe. BMJ 2000; 321: 1124–8.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mackenbach JP. Socio-economic health differences in the Netherlands: a review of recent empirical findings. Soc Sci Med 1992; 34: 213–26.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van der Lucht F, Groothoff JW. Social inequalities and health among children aged 10-11 in the Netherlands: causes and consequences. Soc Sci Med 1995; 40:1305–11.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    West P. Health inequalities in the early years: is there equalization in youth? Soc Sci Med 1997; 44: 833–58.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rahkonen O, Arber S, Lahelma E. Health inequalities in early adulthood: a comparison of young men and women in Britain and Finland. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 163–71.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Henricson K, Melander E, Mölstad S, Ranstam J, Hanson BS, Rametsteiner G, Stenberg P, Melander A. Intra-urban variation of antibiotic utilisation in children: influence of socioeconomic factors. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 54: 653–7.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Henricson K, Stenberg P, Rametsteiner G, Ranstam J, Hanson BS, Melander A. Socio-economic factors, morbidity and drug utilisation - an ecological study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1998; 7: 261–7.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Henricson K, Carlsten A, Ranstam J, Rametsteiner G, et al. Utilisation of codeine and propoxyphene: geographic and demographic variations in prescribing, prescriber and recipient categories. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 55: 605–11.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tuinstra J, Groothoff JW, Van den Heuvel WJA, Post D. Socioeconomic differences in health risk behavior in adolescence: do they exist? Soc Sci Med 1998; 47: 67–74.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tuinstra J, Van Sonderen FLP, Groothoff JW, Van den Heuvel WJA, Post D. Reliability, validity and structure of the adolescent decision making questionnaire among adolescents in The Netherlands. Pers Indiv Differ 2000; 28: 273–85.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Berkel-van Schaik AB, Tax B. Naar een standaardoperationalisatie van sociaal-economische status voor epidemiologisch en sociaal-medisch onderzoek. Rijswijk, The Netherlands: Ministerie van VWS, 1990.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reynolds JR, Ross CE. Social stratification and health: education's benefit beyond economic status and social origins. Soc Problems 1998; 45: 221–47.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Centraal Bureau Statistiek. Statline. Retrieved from on 7 November 2002.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schirm E, Van den Berg P, Gebben H, Sauer P, de Jong-van den Berg LTW. Drug use of children in the community assessed through pharmacy dispensing data. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 50: 473–8.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sweeting H. Reversals of fortune? Sex differences in health in childhood and adolescence. Soc Sci Med 1995; 40: 77–90.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Tobi
    • 1
  • W.M. Meijer
    • 1
  • L.T.W. de Jong-van den Berg
    • 1
  • J. Tuinstra
    • 2
  1. 1.Department Social Pharmacy, Pharmacoepidemiology and PharmacotherapyGroningen University Institute of Drug Exploration (GUIDE)GroningenThe Netherlands E–mail
  2. 2.Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, Department of Health SciencesUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations