Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Transabdominal Ultrasound Guidance on Performance and Outcome of Transcervical Uterine Embryo Transfer

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose : To determine the impact of transabdominal ultrasound guidance on embryo transfer during IVF therapy.

Methods : Retrospective analysis of 823 consecutive embryo transfers. Three hundred and sixty-seven procedures performed with transabdominal ultrasound guidance were compared to 456 cases performed with the “clinical touch” method.

Results : Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer yielded higher, but not statistically significant, clinical pregnancy (48% vs. 44%) and implantation rates (22% vs. 20%). The incidence of multiple pregnancies, ectopic and multiple pregnancy rates were similar. The frequency of negative factors typically associated with difficult transfers, such as requirement of use of tenaculum, and presence of blood or mucus in the catheter tip, were significantly lower in the ultrasound-guided group in comparison with the clinical touch group. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer was associated with a significantly increased easiness of transfer performance; 95% of the transfers were rated as very easy in the ultrasound-guidance group compared to 87% in the clinical touch group. The use of a soft pass catheter was the only variable independently and significantly associated with pregnancy success (odds ratio = 2.74).

Conclusion(s) : Ultrasound-guidance facilitates embryo transfer and in combination with the use of a soft catheter should be implemented to optimize embryo transfer results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA: Optimizing the embryo transfer technique. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1149-1153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen J: How to avoid multiple pregnancies in assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 1998;13(Suppl. 3):197-214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Karande VC, Morris R, Chapman C, Rinehart J, Gleicher N: Impact of the “physician factor” on pregnancy rates in a large assisted reproductive technology program: Do too many cooks spoil the broth? Fertil Steril 1999;71:1001-1009

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hearns-Stokes RM, Miller BT, Scott L, Creuss D, Chakraborty PK, Segars JH: Pregnancy rates after embryo transfer depend on the provider at embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2000;74:80-86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Strickler RC, Christianson C, Crane JP, Curato A, Knight AB, Yang V: Ultrasound guidance for human embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1985;43:54-61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leong M, Leung C, Tucker M, Wong C, Chan H. Ultrasound-assisted embryo transfer. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1986;3:383-385

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lindheim SR, Cohen MA, Sauer MV: Ultrasound guided embryo transfer significantly improves pregnancy rates in women undergoing oocyte donation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999;66:281-284

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wood EG, Batzer FR, Go KJ, Gutmann JN, Corson SL. Ultrasound-guided soft catheter embryo transfers will improve pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2000;15:107-112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Prapas Y, Prapas N, Hatziparasidou A, Vanderzwalmen P,Nijs M, Prapa S, Vlassis G: Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer maximizes the IVF results on day 3 and day 4 embryo transfer but has no impact on day 5. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1904-1908

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Coroleu B, Carreras O, Veiga A, et al.: Embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance improves pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2000;15:616-620

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hurley VA, Osborn JC, Leoni MA, Leeton J: Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: A controlled trial. Fertil Steril 1991;55:559-562.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. al Shawaf T, Yang D, al Magid Y, Seaton A, Iketubosin F, Craft I: Ultrasonic monitoring during replacement of frozen/thawed embryos in natural and hormone replacement cycles. Hum Reprod 1993;8:2068-2074

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kan AK, Abdalla HI, Gafar AH, et al.: Embryo transfer: Ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1259-1261

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tang OS, Ng EH, So WW, Ho PC: Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2001;16:2310-2315

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson RE, Nugent NL, Gregg AT, Nunn SL, Behr BR: Transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves outcome in patients with previous failed in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 2002;77:769-775

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oehninger S, Veeck L, Lanzendorf S, Maloney M, Toner J, Muasher S: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: Achievement of high pregnancy rates in couples with severe male factor infertility is dependent primarily upon female and not male factors. Fertil Steril 1995;64:977-981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Veeck, LL: An Atlas of Human Gametes and Conceptuses. New York, Parthenon, 1998, pp 40-45

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lesny P, Killick SR, Tetlow RL, Robinson J, Maguiness SD: Embryo transfer—Can we learn anything new from the observation of junctional zone contractions? Hum Reprod 1998;13:1540-1546

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schulz KF, Grimes DA: Case-control studies: Research in reverse. Lancet 2002Feb 2;359:431-434

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schoolcraft WB, Surrey ES, Gardner DK: Embryo transfer: Techniques and variables affecting success. Fertil Steril 2001;76:863-870

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lewin A, Schenker JG, Avrech O, Shapira S, Safran A, Friedler S: The role of uterine straightening by passive bladder distension before embryo transfer in IVF cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 1997;14:32-34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lesny P, Killick SR, Robinson J, Raven G, Maguiness SD: Junctional zone contractions and embryo transfer: Is it safe to use a tenaculum? Hum Reprod 1999;14:2367-2370

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dorn C, Reinsberg J, Schlebusch H, Prietl G, van der Ven H, Krebs D: Serum oxytocin concentration during embryo transfer procedure. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999;87:77-80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kovacs GT. What factors are important for successful embryo transfer after in-vitro fertilization? Hum Reprod 1999;14:590-592

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Matorras R, Urquijo E, Mendoza R, Corcostegui B, Exposito A, Rodriguez-Escudero FJ. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy rates and increases the frequency of easy transfers. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1762-1766

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ghazzawi IM, Al Hasani S, Karaki R, Souso S. Transfer technique and catheter choice influence the incidence of transcervical embryo expulsion and the outcome of IVF. Hum Reprod 1999;14:677-682

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mirkin, S., Jones, E.L., Mayer, J.F. et al. Impact of Transabdominal Ultrasound Guidance on Performance and Outcome of Transcervical Uterine Embryo Transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 20, 318–322 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024809607966

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024809607966

Navigation