Skip to main content
Log in

Finding Geographic Information: Collection-Level Metadata

  • Published:
GeoInformatica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Certain types of information are associated with specific locations on Earth’s surface, and can be retrieved using location as the primary search key. The combination of a collection of such information and a location-based search mechanism is termed a geolibrary. A search for specific information over multiple collections is more efficient if one knows where to look. Information about the contents of a collection is termed collection-level metadata (CLM). Several conceptual designs for the process of search are reviewed, and the U.S. National Geospatial Data Clearinghouse is discussed. The Alexandria Digital Library provides an example of a large digital collection. Its geographic coverage is analyzed to determine whether its CLM can be modeled effectively. The difficulties of describing CLM are discussed from the perspective of institutional change, as library collections attempt to make themselves more accessible through the Internet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B.J.L. Berry, J.B. Parr, B.J. Epstein, A. Ghosh, and R.H.T. Smith. Market Centers and Retail Location: Theory and Applications. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P.A. Burrough and A.U. Frank (Eds.). Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries. Taylor and Francis: London, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Dodge and R. Kitchin. Mapping Cyberspace. Routledge: New York, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Dolin, D. Agrawal, A. El Abbadi, and L. Dillon. “Pharos: a scalable distributed architecture for locating heterogeneous information sources,” Proceedings, Sixth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM '97. http://pharos.alexandria.ucsb.edu/publications, 1997.

  5. A.S. Fotheringham and M.E. O'Kelly. Spatial Interaction Models: Formulations and Applications. Kluwer: Dordrecht, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.F. Goodchild. “Towards a geography of geographic information in a digital world,” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 21(6):377–391, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M.F. Goodchild. “The geolibrary,” in S. Carver (Ed.), Innovations in GIS 5, Taylor and Francis: London, 59–68, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.F. Goodchild. “Towards a location theory of distributed computing and e-commerce,” in T.R. Leinbach and S.D. Brunn (Eds.), Worlds of E-Commerce: Economic, Geographical and Social Dimensions, Wiley: New York, 67–86, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Gravano, K. Chang, H. Garcia-Molina, C. Lagoze, and A. Paepcke. STARTS: Stanford protocol proposal for Internet retrieval and search. Digital Library Project, Stanford University. http://www-db.stanford.edu/~gravano/starts.html.

  10. K.E. Haynes and A.S. Fotheringham. Gravity and Spatial Interaction Models. Sage: Beverly Hills, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L.L. Hill. “Building georeferenced collections: Gazetteer services,” Taxonomy Authority File Workshop, Washington, D.C., June 22–23, 1998. http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/~lhill/Gazetteer_Taxonomy_Presentation/Taxonomy_presentation.html.

  12. L.L. Hill, G. Janée, R. Dolin, J. Frew, and M. Larsgaard. Collection metadata solutions for digital library applications. Alexandria Digital Library, University of California: Santa Barbara, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D.G. Janelle and D.C. Hodge (Eds.). Information, Place, and Cyberspace. Springer: New York, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Lagoze, STARTS: Stanford protocol proposal for Internet search and retrieval: reference implementation. http://www2.cs.cornell.edu/lagoze/starts/starts_reference.html, 1998.

  15. Mapping Science Committee, National Research Council. Distributed Geolibraries: Spatial Data Resources. National Academy Press: Washington, D.C., 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D.R. Montello, M.F. Goodchild, P. Fohl, and J. Gottsegen. “Fuzzy spatial queries in digital spatial data libraries,” Proceedings, FUZZ-IEEE 98, 1998 World Congress on Computational Intelligence, Anchorage, Alaska, 1998.

  17. S. Murnion and R.G. Healey. “Modeling distance decay effects in Web server information flows,” Geographical Analysis, Vol. 30(4):285–303, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Olsson, Distance and Human Interaction: A Review and Bibliography. Regional Science Research Institute: Philadelphia, PA, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A.G. Wilson. Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling. Pion: London, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodchild, M.F., Zhou, J. Finding Geographic Information: Collection-Level Metadata. GeoInformatica 7, 95–112 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023451824100

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023451824100

Navigation