, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 55–67 | Cite as

Cell line provenance

  • R. Ian Freshney


Cultured cell lines have become an extremely valuable resource, both in academic research and in industrial biotechnology. However, their value is frequently compromised by misidentification and undetected microbial contamination. As detailed elsewhere in this volume, the technology, both simple and sophisticated, is available to remedy the problems of misidentification and contamination, given the will to apply it. Combined with proper records of the origin and history of the cell line, assays for authentication and contamination contribute to the provenance of the cell line. Detailed records should start from the initiation or receipt of the cell line, and should incorporate data on the donor as well as the tissue from which the cell line was derived, should continue with details of maintenance, and include any accidental as well as deliberate deviations from normal maintenance. Records should also contain details of authentication and regular checks for contamination. With this information, preferably stored in a database, and suitable backed up, the provenance of the cell line so created makes the cell line a much more valuable resource, fit for validation in industrial applications and more likely to provide reproducible experimental results when disseminated for research in other laboratories.

cell lines industrial biotechnology microbialcontamination 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andersson LC, Jokinen M and Gahmberg CG (1979) Induction of erythroid differentiation in the human leukaemia cell line K562. Nature 278: 364–365.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burchell J, Durbin H and Taylor-Papadimitriou J (1983) Complexity of expression of antigenic determinants, recognized by monoclonal antibodies HMFG-l and HMFG-2 in normal and malignant human mammary epithelial cells. J Immunol 131: 508–513.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. DHSS (Department of Health and Social Security) (1986) Good laboratory practice. The United Kingdom Compliance Programme. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  4. FDA (Food and Drug Administration) (1992) Federal Register 21. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 58. Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Records, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  5. Fojo A, Akiyana S-I, Gottesman MM and Pastan I (1985) Reduced drug accumulation in multiple drug resistant human KB carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Res 51: 67–72.Google Scholar
  6. Freshney RI (2000) Culture of Animal Cells, a Manual of Basic Technique (pp. 269–283) Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Freshney RI (2000) Culture of Animal Cells, a Manual of Basic Technique (pp. 51–63) Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Freshney RI (2002) Introduction. In Freshney RI and Freshney MG (eds), Culture of Epithelial Cells, 2nd ed. (pp. 1–30) Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Friend C, Scher W, Holland JG and Sato T (1971) Hemoglobin synthesis in murine virus-induced leukemic cells in vitro. 2. Stimulation of erythroid differentiation by dimethyl sulfoxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 68: 378–382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hay RJ (2000) Cell Line Preservation and Characterization. In: Masters JWR (ed.) Animal Cell Culture, a Practical Approach, (pp. 95–148) IRL Press at Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  11. Hay RJ (2002) Cell Quantitation and Characterization. In: Atala A and Lanza RP (eds) Methods of Tissue Engineering (pp. 55–84) Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  12. Hayflick L and Moorhead PS (1961) The serial cultivation of human diploid cell strains. Exp Cell Res 25: 585–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heyderman E, Strudley I, Powell G, Richardson TC, Cordell IL and Mason DY (1985) A new monoclonal antibody to epithelial membrane antigen (EMA)E29. A comparison of its immunocytochemical reactivity with polyclonal anti-EMA antibodies and with another monoclonal antibody, HMFG-2. Br J Cancer 52: 355–361.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ikeda T, Sawada N, Satoh M and Mori M (1998) Induction of tyrosine aminotransferase of primary cultured rat hepatocytes depends on the organization of microtubules. J Cell Physiol 175: 41–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keith WN (2000) Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation. In: Masters JWR (ed.) Animal Cell Culture, a Practical Approach, (pp. 221–233) IRL Press at Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  16. MacLeod RA, Dirks WG, Matsuo Y, Kaufmann M, Milch H and Drexler HG (1999) Widespread intraspecies cross-contamination of human tumor cell lines arising at source. Int J Cancer 83: 555–563.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nelson-Rees W, Daniels D and Flandermeyer RR (1981) Cross Contamination of cells in culture, Science 212: 446–452.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Otsu K, Ito K, Kuzumaki T and Iuchi Y (2001) Differential regulation of liver-specific and ubiquitously-expressed genes in primary rat hepatocytes by the extracellular matrix. Cell Physiol Biochem 11: 33–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Parkinson EK and Yeudall WA (2002) In: Freshney RI and Freshney MG (eds), Culture of Epithelial Cells, 2nd ed. (pp. 65-94) Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Pollack MS, Heagney SD, Livingston PO and Fogh J (1981) HLAA, B, C and DR alloantigen expression on forty-six cultured human tumor cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst 66: 1003–1012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Raff MC, Fields KL, Hakomori SL, Minsky R, Pruss RM and Winter J (1979) Cell-type-specific markers for distinguishing and studying neurons and the major classes of glial cells in culture. Brain Res 174: 283–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sasaki M, Honda T, Yamada H, Wake N and Barrett JC (1994) Evidence for multiple pathways to cellular senescence. Cancer Res 54: 6090–6093.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Schleger C, Heck R, Niketeghad F, Schirmacher P, Radaeva S, Oesch F, Dienes HP, Bannasch P and Steinberg P (1997) Establishment and characterization of a nontumorigenic cell line derived from a human hepatocellular adenoma expressing hepatocyte-specific markers. Exp Cell Res 236: 418–426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Soule HD, Maloney TM, Wolman SR, Teterson WD, Brenz R, McGrath CM, Russo J, Pauley RJ, Jones RF and Brooks SC (1990) Isolation and characterization of a spontaneously immortalized human breast epithelial cell line, MCF-10. Cancer Res 50: 6075–6086.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Stacey GN, Masters JRM, Hay RJ, Drexler HG, MacLeod RAF and Freshney RI (2000) Cell contamination leads to inaccurate data: We must take action now. Nature 403: 456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Villa S and Delia D (1988) Analysis of leukocyte antigens detected by immunoenzymatic staining on human bone marrow colonies. Experim Hematol 16: 340–343.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Ian Freshney
    • 1
  1. 1.Cancer Research UK Department of Medical OncologyGlasgow University, Garscube Estate, BearsdenGlasgowU.K. (E-mail

Personalised recommendations