Abstract
Purpose: Our purpose was to investigate the influence of semen quality on fertilization, embryo morphology, cleavage, and cryosurvival in conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)programs.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of 513 couples undergoing IVF and 255 couples undergoing ICSI was done.
Results: Semen quality influenced fertilization in IVF and abnormal fertilization in IVF and ICSI, but no effects on the development, morphology, implantation capacity, or cryosurvival of embryos were found. Fertilization, embryo quality, and cryosurvival rates were similar after IVF and ICSI. The fertilization rate of mature oocytes in IVF was lower when cytoplasmic immaturity in the oocyte population was frequent. The speed of development of embryos was 2 hr faster after ICSI than after IVF. Two-cell–stage embryos survived best after cryopreservation with propanediol and sucrose on day 2.
Conclusions: After fertilization, semen parameters had no effect on the quality or cryosurvival of embryos in either IVF or ICSI.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Eginsu ME, Pieters MHEC, Dumoulin JCM, Evers JLH, Geraedts JPM: Male factor as determinant of in-vitro fertilization outcome. Hum Reprod 1992;7:1136–1140
Ford WCL, Williams KM, McLaughlin EA, Harrison S, Ray B, Hull MGR: The indirect immunobead test for seminal antisperm antibodies and fertilization rates at in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1418–1422
Arnot AM, Vandekerckhove P, DeBono MA, Rutherford AJ: Follicular volume and number during in-vitro fertilization: Association with oocyte developmental capacity and pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod 1995;10:256–261
Van Steirteghem AC, Nagy Z, Joris H, Liu J, Staessen C, Smitz J, Wisanto A, Devroey P: High fertilization and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1061–1066
Liu J, Nagy Z, Joris H, Tournaye H, Smitz J, Camus M, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A: Analysis of 76 total fertilization failure cycles out of 2732 intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Hum Reprod 1995;10:2630–2636
Vanderzwalmen P, Bertin G, Lejeune B, Nijs M, Vandamme B, Schoysman R: Two essential steps for a successful intracytoplasmic sperm injection: Injection of immobilized spermatozoa after rupture of the oolema. Hum Reprod 1996;11:540–547
Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Amin YM, Kamal A: Prospective controlled randomized study of in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the treatment of tubal factor infertility with normal semen parameters. Fertil Steril 1996;66:753–756
Yang D, Shahata MA, Al-Bader M, Al-Natsha SD, Al-Flamerzia M, Al-Shawaf T: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection improving embryo quality: comparison of the sibling oocytes of non-male-factor couples. J Assist Reprod Genet 1996;13:351–355
Ruiz A, Remohi J, Minguez Y, Guanes PP, Simón C, Pellicer A: The role of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in couples with unexplained infertility after failed intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1997;68:171–173
Gianaroli L, Fiorentino A, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Montanaro N: Prolonged sperm-oocyte exposure and high sperm concentration affect human embryo viability and pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod 1996;11:2507–2511
Parinaud J, Mieusset R, Vieitez G, Labal B, Richoilley G: Influence of sperm parameters on embryo quality. Fertil Steril 1993;60:888–892
Grow DR, Oehninger S, Seltman HJ, Toner JP, Swanson RJ, Kruger TF, Muasher SJ: Sperm morphology as diagnosed by strict criteria: Probing the impact of teratozoospermia on fertilization rate and pregnancy outcome in a large in vitro fertilization population. Fertil Steril 1994;62:559–567
Janny L, Menezo YJR: Evidence for a strong paternal effect on human preimplantation embryo development and blastocyst formation. Mol Reprod Dev 1994;38:36–42
Nagy ZP, Verheyen G, Liu J, Joris H, Janssensvillen C, Wisanto A, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC: Results of 55 intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles in the treatment of male-immunological infertility. Hum Reprod 1995;10:1775–1780
Nijs M, Vanderzwalmeen P, Vandamme B, Segal-Bertin G, Lejeune B, Segal L, van Roosendaal E, Schoysman R: Fertilizing ability of immotile spermatozoa after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1996;11:2180–2185
Ectors FJ, Vanderzvalmen P, Van Hoeck J, Nijs M, Verhaegen G, Delvigne A, Schoysman R, Leroy F: Relationship of human follicular diameter with oocyte fertilization and development after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2002–2005
Staessen C, Nagy ZP, Liu J, Janssensvillen C, Camus M, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC: One year's experience with elective transfer of two good quality embryos in the human in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection programmes. Hum Reprod 1995;10:3305–3312
Oehninger S, Kruger TF, Simon T, Jones D, Mayer J, Lanzendorf S, Toner JP, Muasher SJ: A comparative analysis of embryo implantation potential in patients with severe teratozoospermia undergoing in-vitro fertilization with a high insemination concentration or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1086–1089
Bar-Hava I, Ashkenazi J, Shelef M, Schwartz A, Brengauz M, Feldberg D, Orvieto R, Ben-Rafael Z: Morphology and clinical outcomes of embryos after in vitro fertilization are superior to those after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 1997;68:653–657
Van den Abbeel E, Camus M, Van Waesberghe L, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC: Viability of partially damaged human embryos after cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2006–2010
Kondo I, Suganuma N, Ando T, Asada Y, Furuhashi M, Tomoda Y: Clinical factors for successful cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 1996;13:201–206
Al-Hasani S, Ludwig M, Gagsteiger F, Küpker W, Sturm R, Yilmaz A, Bauer O, Diedrich K: Comparison of cryopreservation of supernumerary pronuclear human oocytes obtained after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and after conventional in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1996;11:694–697
Van Steirteghem AC, Van der Elst J, Van den Abbeel E, Joris H, Camus M, Devroey P: Cryopreservation of supernumerary multicellular human embryos obtained after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 1994;62:775–780
World Health Organization: WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction, 3rd ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992
Veeck LL: Atlas of the Human Oocyte and Early Conceptus, Vol 2. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1991, pp 121–123
Yue Z, Meng FJ, JØorgensen N, Ziebe S, Nyboe Andersen A: Sperm morphology using strict criteria after Percoll density separation: Influence on cleavage and pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1995;10:1781–1785
Terriou P, Giorgetti C, Auquier P, Hans E, Spach J-L, Salzmann J, Roulier R: Teratozoospermia influences fertilization rate in vitro but not embryo quality. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1069–1072
Clarke GN, Bourne H, Baker HWG: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection for treating infertility associated with sperm autoimmunity. Fertil Steril 1997;68:112–117
Lundin K, Söderlund B, Hamberger L: The relationship between sperm morphology and rates of fertilization, pregnancy and spontaneous abortion in an in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection programme. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2676–2681
Gabrielsen A, Petersen K, Mikkelsen AL, Lindenberg S: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection does not overcome an oocyte defect in previous fertilization failure with conventional in-vitro fertilization and normal spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1963–1965
Tomas C, Orava M, Tuomivaara L, Martikainen H: Low pregnancy rate is achieved in patients treated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection due to previous low or failed fertilization in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1998;13:65–70
Payne D, Flaherty SP, Jeffrey R, Warnes GW, Matthews CD: Successful treatment of severe male factor infertility in 100 consecutive cycles using intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1994;9:2051–2057
Avrech OM, Goldman GA, Rufas O, Stein A, Amit S, Yoles I, Pinkas H, Fisch B: Treatment variables in relation to oocyte maturation: Lessons from a clinical micromanipulation-assisted in vitro fertilization program. J Assist Reprod Genet 1997;14:337–342
Calafell JM, Badenas J, Egozcue J, Santalo J: Premature chromosome condensation as a sign of oocyte immaturity. Hum Reprod 1991;6:1017–1021
Tarín JJ, Pellicer A: Consequences of high ovarian response to gonadotropins: A cytogenetic analysis of unfertilized human oocytes. Fertil Steril 1990;54:665–670
Pellicer A, Ruiz A, Castellvi RM, Calatayud C, Ruiz M, Tarin JJ, Miró F, Bonilla-Musoles F: Is the retrieval of high numbers of oocytes desirable in patients treated with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa) and gonadotrophins? Hum Reprod 1989;4:526–540
Plachot M, Crozet N: Fertilization abnormalities in human in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1992;7 (Suppl 1):89–94
Nagy ZP, Liu J, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A: Time-course of oocyte activation, pronucleus formation and cleavage in human oocytes fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1743–1748
Van den Abbeel E, Van der Elst J, Van Waesberghe L, Camus M, Devroey P, Khan I, Smitz J, Staessen C, Wisanto A, Van Steirteghem A: Hyperstimulation: The need for cryopreservation of embryos. Hum Reprod 1988;3 (Suppl 2):53–57
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moilanen, J.M., Tulppala, M., Reima, I. et al. Fertilization, Embryo Quality, and Cryosurvival in In Vitro Fertilization and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 16, 17–23 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022589427805
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022589427805