Advertisement

Evaluation of Pregnancy Rates After Intrauterine Insemination According to Indication, Age, and Sperm Parameters

  • Lucette A. van der Westerlaken
  • Nico Naaktgeboren
  • Frans M. Helmerhorst
Article

Abstract

Purpose: Our purpose was to evaluate intrauterine insemination results obtained in our clinic and identify prognostic factors for the chance of pregnancy.

Methods: A retrospective study of data from 1989 to 1996 was undertaken. Only first attempts were included in this study, except for the part on the cumulative pregnancy rates. Couples with either one-sided tubapathology, hormonal dysfunction, idiopathic infertility, or andrological indication were selected. All women were stimulated with clomiphene citrate. Five hundred sixty-six couples who underwent 1763 cycles were included in the study.

Results: The overall pregnancy rate for first pregnancies was 6.9% per cycle and 21.4% per patient. For first intrauterine insemination attempts this was 8.8% per cycle/patient, varying between 5.0% for andrological indication and 10.6% for tubapathology, 10.0% for idiopatic indication, and 10.3% for hormonal indication. These differences were not significant. Age did not have a significant effect either, although there were no pregnancies observed in women 40 years or older. The number of inseminated spermatozoa significantly affected the pregnancy rate: <2 million, 4.6%; ≥2 to <10 million, 3.9%; and ≥10 million, 11.3%.

Conclusions: Unless semen characteristics are insufficient, intrauterine insemination is a useful treatment for infertile couples.

age indication intrauterine insemination pregnancy rate sperm characteristics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Martinez AR, Bernardus RE, Vermeiden JPW, Schoemaker J: Basic questions on intrauterine insemination: An update. Obstet Gynaecol Surv 1993;48: 811–828Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Campana A, Sakkas D, Stalberg A, Bianchi PG, Comte I, Pache T, Walker D: Intrauterine insemination: evaluation of the results according to the woman's age, sperm quality, total sperm count per insemination and life table analysis. Hum Reprod 1996;11:732–736Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mathieu C, Ecochard R, Bied V, Lornage J, Czyba JC: Cumulative conception rate following intrauterine artificial insemination with husband's spermatozoa: Influence of husband's age. Hum Reprod 1995;10:1090–1097Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frederick JL, Denker MS, Rojas A, Horta I, Stone SC, Asch RH, Balmaceda JP: Is there a role for ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination after age 40? Hum Reprod 1994;9:2284–2286Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brasch JG, Rawlins R, Tarchala S, Radwanska E: The relationship between total motile sperm count and the succes of intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1994;62:150–154Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Friedman AJ, Juneau-Norcross M, Sedensky B, Andrews N, Dorfman J, Cramer DW: Life table analysis of intrauterine insemination pregnancy rates for couples with cervical factor, male factor and idiopathic infertility. Fertil Steril 1991;55:1005–1007Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arici A, Byrd W, Bradshaw K, Kutteh WH, Marshburn P, Can BR: Evaluation of clomiphene citrate and human chorionic gonadotropin treatment: A prospective, randomized, crossover study during intrauterine insemination cycles. Fertil Steril 1994; 61:314–318.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lalich RA, Marut EL, Prins GS, Scommegna A: Life table analysis of intrauterine insemination pregnancy rates. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 1986;4:980–984Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    World Health Organization: WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction, 2nd ed. Cambridge, Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1987, p 27Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hull MGR, Glazener CMA, Kelly NJ: Population study of causes, treatment, and outcome of infertility. BMJ 1985;291(6510):1693–1697Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oei SG, Bloemenkamp KWM, Helmerhorst FM, Naaktgeboren N, Keirse MJNC: Evaluation of the postcoital test for assessment of “cervical factor” infertility. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 1996;64:217–220Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gindoff PR, Jewelewicz R: Reproductive potential in the older woman. Fertil Steril 1986;46:989–1001Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Navot D, Bergh PA, Williams MA, Garrisi GJ, Gusman I, Sander, et al.: Poor oocyte quality rather than implantation failure as a cause of age related decline in female fertility. Lancet 1991;337(8754):1375–1377Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Corsan G, Trias A, Trout S, Kemmann E: Ovulation induction combined with intrauterine insemination in women of 40 years of age and older: is it worthwhile? Hum Reprod 1996;11:1109–1112Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burr RW, Siegberg R, Flaherty SP, Wang XJ, Matthews CD: The influence of sperm morphology and the number of motile sperm inseminated on the outcome of intrauterine insemination combined with mild ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 1996;65: 127–132Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Agarwell SK, Buyalos RP: Clomiphene citrate with intrauterine insemination: Is it effective therapy in women above the age of 35 years? Fertil Steril 1996;65:759–763Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucette A. van der Westerlaken
    • 1
  • Nico Naaktgeboren
    • 1
  • Frans M. Helmerhorst
    • 1
  1. 1.IVF Centre, Department of Reproductive MedicineUniversity Hospital LeidenLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations