Skip to main content
Log in

Preimplantation Diagnosis by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Using 13-, 16-, 18-, 21-, 22-, X-, and Y-Chromosome Probes

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: Our purpose was to select the proper chromosomes for preimplantation diagnosis based on aneuploidy distribution in abortuses and to carry out a feasibility study of preimplantation diagnosis for embryos using multiple-probe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on the selected chromosomes of biopsied blastomeres.

Methods: After determining the frequency distribution of aneuploidy found in abortuses, seven chromosomes were selected for FISH probes. Blastomeres were obtained from 33 abnormal or excess embryos. The chromosome complements of both the biopsied blastomeres and the remaining sibling blastomeres in each embryo were determined by FISH and compared to evaluate their preimplantation diagnostic potential.

Results: Chromosomes (16, 22, X, Y) and (13, 18, 21) were selected on the basis of the high aneuploid prevalence in abortuses for the former group and the presence of trisomy in the newborn for the latter. Thirty-six (72%) of 50 blastomeres gave signals to permit a diagnosis. Diagnoses made from biopsied blasotmeres were consistent with the diagnoses made from the remaining sibling blastomeres in 18 embryos. In only 2 of 20 cases did the biopsied blastomere diagnosis and the embryo diagnosis not match.

Conclusions: If FISH of biopsied blastomere was successful, a preimplantation diagnosis could be made with 10% error. When a combination of chromosome-13, -16, -18, -21, -22, -X, and -Y probes was used, up to 65% of the embryos destined to be aborted could be detected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. De Mouzon J, Lancaster P: World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization preliminary data for 1995. J Assist Reprod Genet 1997;14(Suppl):251S-265S

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hassold T, Chen N, Funkhouser J, Jooss T, Manuel B, Matsuura J, Matsuyama A, Wilson C, Yamane JA, Jacobs PA: A cytogenetic study of 1000 spontaneous abortions. Ann Hum Genet Lond 1980;44:151-178

    Google Scholar 

  3. Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH, Hardy K, Winston RML: Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature 1990;344:768-770

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gianaroli L, Magli M, Ferraretti A, Firorentino A, Garrisi J, Mune S: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis increases the implantation rate in human in vitro fertilization by avoiding the transfer of chromosomally abnormal embryos. Fertil Steril 1997;68:1128-1131

    Google Scholar 

  5. Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Freidine M, Ivakhnenko V, Wolf G, Kovalinskaya L, White M, Lifchez A, Kaplan B, Moise J, Valle J, Ginsberg N, Strom C, Kuliev A: Polar body diagnosis of common aneuploidies by FISH. J Assist Reprod Genet 1996;13:157-162

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sasabe Y: Biopsy of mouse embryo fertilized in vitro as a preclinical model for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Acta Obst Gynaec Jpn 1993;45:650-656

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tarkowski AK: An air-drying method for chromosome preparations from mouse eggs. Cytogenetics 1966;5:394-400

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yoshizawa M: Analysis of early development and chromosomal constitution of tripronuclear human and mouse eggs fertilized in vitro, Jpn F Fertil Steril 1997;42:34-38

    Google Scholar 

  9. Munné S, Lee A, Rosenwaks, Z, Grifo J, Cohen J: Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod 1993;8:2185-2191

    Google Scholar 

  10. Benadiva C, Kligman I, Munné S: Aneuploidy 16 in human embryos increases significantly with maternal age. Fertil Steril 1996;66:248-255

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sasabe, Y., Katayama, K.P., Nishimura, T. et al. Preimplantation Diagnosis by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Using 13-, 16-, 18-, 21-, 22-, X-, and Y-Chromosome Probes. J Assist Reprod Genet 16, 92–96 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022520907332

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022520907332

Navigation