Advertisement

Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 28, Issue 12, pp 2429–2448 | Cite as

Systemic, Genotype-Specific Induction of Two Herbivore-Deterrent Iridoid Glycosides in Plantago lanceolata L. in Response to Fungal Infection by Diaporthe adunca (Rob.) Niessel

  • Hamida B. Marak
  • Arjen Biere
  • Jos M. M. Van Damme
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Iridoid glycosides are a group of terpenoid secondary plant compounds known to deter generalist insect herbivores. In ribwort plantain (Plantago lanceolata), the iridoid glycosides aucubin and catalpol can be induced following damage by insect herbivores. In this study, we investigated whether the same compounds can be induced following infection by the fungal pathogen Diaporthe adunca, the causal agent of a stalk disease in P. lanceolata. Significant induction of aucubin and catalpol was observed in two of the three plant genotypes used in this study following inoculation with the pathogen. In one of the genotypes, induction occurred within 6 hr after inoculation, and no decay was observed within 8 days. The highest level of induction was observed in reproductive tissues (spikes and stalks) where infection took place. In these tissues, iridoid glycoside levels in infected plants were, on average, 97% and 37% higher than the constitutive levels in the corresponding control plants, respectively. Significant induction was also observed in leaves (24%) and roots (17%). In addition to significant genotypic variation in the level of induction, we found genetic variation for the tissue-specific pattern of induction, further broadening the scope for evolutionary fine-tuning of induced responses. Recent studies have revealed a negative association between iridoid glycoside levels in P. lanceolata genotypes and the amount of growth and reproduction of D. adunca that these genotypes support. However, for the three genotypes used in the present study, differences in resistance were not related to their constitutive or induced levels of iridoid glycosides, suggesting that additional resistance mechanisms are important in this host-pathogen system. We conclude that iridoid glycosides in P. lanceolata can be induced both by arthropods and pathogenic micro-organisms. Pathogen infection could, therefore, potentially enhance resistance to generalist insect herbivores in this species.

Constitutive chemical defense induced chemical defense Diaporthe adunca genetic variation Plantago lanceolata plant–pathogen interactions plant–herbivore interactions 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Adler, L. S., Schmitt, J., and Bowers, M. D. 1995. Genetic variation in defensive chemistry in Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae) and its effect on the specialist herbivore Junonia coenia (Nymphalidae). Oecologia 101:75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A.A. 2000. Induced plant defense: evolution of induction and adaptive phenotypic plasticity, pp. 251–268, in A. A. Agrawal, S. Tuzun and E. Bent (eds.). Induced Plant Defenses Against Herbivores. Biochemistry, Ecology, and Agriculture. APS Press, St. Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, J. A. and Mansfield, J. W. (eds.). 1982. Phytoalexins. Blackie, Glasgow.Google Scholar
  4. Baldwin, I. T. and Karb, M. J. 1995. Plasticity in the allocation of nicotine to reproductive parts in Nicotiana attenuata. J. Chem. Ecol. 21:897–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbosa, P. 1991. Plant pathogens and nonvector herbivores, pp. 341–382, in P. Barbosa, V. A. Krischik and C. G. Jones (eds.). Microbial Mediation of Plant-Herbivore Interactions. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Bowers, M. D. 1991. Iridoid glycosides, pp. 297–325, in G. A. Rosenthal and M. R. Berenbaum (eds.). Herbivores: Their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites, 2nd. ed. Academic Press, San Diego, California. 2446 MARAK, BIERE, AND VAN DAMMECrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowers, M. D. and Puttick, G. M. 1988. Response of generalist and specialist insect to qualitative allelochemical variation. J. Chem. Ecol. 14:319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowers, M. D. and Puttick, G. M. 1989. Iridoid glycosides and insect feeding preferences: gypsy moths (Lymantria dispar, Lymantriidae) and buckeyes (Junonia coenia, Nymphalidae). Ecol. Entomol. 14:247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowers, M. D. and Stamp, N. E. 1992. Chemical variation within and between individuals of Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae). J. Chem. Ecol. 18:985–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowers, M. D. and Stamp, N. E. 1993. Effects of plant age, genotype, and herbivory on Plantago performance and chemistry. Ecology 74:1778–1791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowers, M.D. and Stamp, N.E. 1997. Effects of host plant genotype and predators on iridoid glycoside content of pupae of a specialist insect herbivore, Junonia coenia (Nymphalidae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 25:571–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowers, M. D., Collinge, S. K., Gamble, S. E., and Schmitt, J. 1992. Effects of genotype, habitat, and seasonal variation on iridoid glycoside content of Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae) and the implications for insect herbivores. Oecologia 91:201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Camara, M. D. 1997. Predator responses to sequestered plant toxins in the buckeye caterpillars: are tritrophic interactions locally variable? J. Chem. Ecol. 23:2093–2106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Damtoft, S., Jensen, S. R., and Nielsen, B. J. 1983. The biosynthesis of iridoid glucosides from 8-epi-deoxyloganic acid. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 11:593–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Darrow, K. and Bowers, M. D. 1997. Phenological and population variation in iridoid glycosides of Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 25:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Darrow, K. and Bowers, M. D. 1999. Effects of herbivore damage and nutrient level on induction of iridoid glycosides in Plantago lanceolata. J. Chem. Ecol. 25:1427–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davini, E., Iavarone, C., Trogolo, C., Aureli, P., and Pasolini, B. 1986. The quantitative isolation and antimicrobial activity of the aglycone of aucubin. Phytochemistry 25:2420–2422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Nooij, M. P. and Van Der Aa, H. A. 1987. Phomopsis subordinaria and associated stalk disease in natural populations of Plantago lanceolata. Can. J. Bot. 65:2318–2325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duff, R. B., Bacon, J. S. D., Mundie, C. M., Farmer, V. C., Russell, J. D., and Forrester, A. R. 1965. Catalpol and methylcatalpol: Naturally ocurring glycosides in Plantago and Buddleia species. Biochem. J. 96:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dyer, L. A. and Bowers, M. D. 1996. The importance of sequestered iridoid glycosides as a defense against an ant predator. J. Chem. Ecol. 22:1527–1539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fajer, E. D., Bowers, M. D., and Bazzaz, F. A. 1992. The effect of nutrients and enriched CO2 environments on production of carbon-based allelochemicals in Plantago: a test of the carbon/nutrient balance hypothesis. Am. Nat. 104:707–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Felton, G. W. and Korth, K. L. 2000. Trade-offs between pathogen and herbivore resistance. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 3:309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gange, A. C. and West, H. M. 1994. Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and foliarfeeding insects on Plantago lanceolata L. New Phytol. 128:79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gardner, D. R. and Stermitz, F. R. 1988. Host plant utilization and iridoid glycoside sequestration by Euphdryas anicia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 14:2147–2168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haeck, J. 1992. Phytosociology of Plantago habitats in the Netherlands and the relation with habitat characteristics, pp. 20–29, in P. J. C. Kuiper and M. Bos (eds.). Plantago. A Multidisciplinary Study. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hammerschmidt, R. and Kuc, J. 1995. Induced Resistance to Disease in Plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  27. Hammerschmidt, R. and Schultz, J. C. 1996. Multiple Defenses and Signals in Plant Defense against Pathogens and Herbivores. Rec. Adv. Phytochem. 30:122–154.Google Scholar
  28. Harborne, J. B. 1993. Introduction to Ecological Biochemistry. 4th edn. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  29. Hartmann, T. 1991. Alkaloids, pp. 79–121, in G. A. Rosenthal and M. R. Berenbaum (eds.). Herbivores: Their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites, 2nd. ed. Academic Press, San Diego, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hatcher, P. E. 1995. Three-way interactions between plant pathogenic fungi, herbivorous insects and their host plants. Biol. Rev. 70:639–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hougen-Eitzman, D. and Rausher, M. D. 1994. Interactions between herbivorous insects and plantinsect coevolution. Am. Nat. 143:677–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ishiguro, K., Yamaki, M., and Takagi, S. 1982. Studies on the iridoid related compounds. I. On antimicrobial activity of aucubigenin and certain iridoid aglycones. Yakugaku Zasshi 102:755–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jarzomski, C. M., Stamp, N. E., and Bowers, M. D. 2000. Effects of plant phenology, nutrients and herbivory on growth and defensive chemistry of plantain, Plantago lanceolata. Oikos 88:371–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jensen, S. R. 1991. Plant iridoids, their biosynthesis and distribution in angiosperms, pp. 133–158, in J. B. Harborne and F. A. Tomas-Barberan (eds.). Ecological Chemistry and Biochemistry of Plant Terpenoids. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  35. Karban, R. and Baldwin, I. T. 1997. Induced Responses to Herbivory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klepzig, K. D., Smalley, E. B., and Raffa, K. F. 1996. Combined chemical defenses against an insect-fungal complex. J. Chem. Ecol. 22:1367–1385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Klockars, G. K., Bowers, M. D., and Cooney, B. 1993. Leaf variation in iridoid glycoside content of Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae) and oviposition of the buckeye butterfly, Junonia coenia (Nymphalidae). Chemoecology 4:72–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kogan, M. and Fischer, D. C. 1991. Inducible defences in soybean against herbivorous insects, pp. 347–378, in D. W. Tallamy and M. J. Raupp (eds.). Phytochemical Induction by Herbivores. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Krischik, V.A. 1991. Specific or generalized plant defense: reciprocal interactions between herbivores and pathogens, pp. 309–340, in P. Barbosa, V. A. Krischik and C. G. Jones (eds.). Microbial Mediation of Plant-Herbivore Interactions. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Krischik, V. A., Goth, P., and Barbosa, P. 1991. Generalized plant defense: effects on multiple species. Oecologia 85:562–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Linders, E. G. A. 1996. A possible role of sexuality in the population structure of Diaporthe adunca, a pathogen of Plantago lanceolata. Plant Pathol. 45:697–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Linders, E. G. A., Van Damme, J. M. M., and Zadoks, J. C. 1996. Transmission and overseasoning of Diaporthe adunca on Plantago lanceolata. Plant Pathol. 45:59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marak, H. B. 2000. Costs and benefits of iridoid glycosides as defense against pathogenic fungi of Plantago lanceolata. PhD thesis. Univerity of Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  44. Marak, H. B., Biere, A., and Van Damme, J.M.M. 2000. Direct and correlated responses to selection on iridoid glycosides in Plantago lanceolata L. J. Evol. Biol. 13:985–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marak, H. B., Biere, A., and Van Damme, J.M.M. 2002. Two herbivor-deterrent iridoid glycosides reduce the in-vitro growth of a specialist but not of a generalist pathogenic fungus of Plantago lanceolata. J. Chemoecology (in press).Google Scholar
  46. Mcgarvey, D. J. and Croteau, R. 1995. Terpenoid metabolism. Plant Cell 7:1015–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nitao, J. K. and Zangerl, A. R. 1987. Floral development and chemical defense allocation in wild parsnip (Pastinaca sativa). Ecology 68:521–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Paul, N. D., Hatcher, P. E., and Taylor, J. E. 1999. Coping with multiple enemies: an integration of molecular and ecological perspectives. Trends Plant Sci. 5:220–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pereyra, P. C. and Bowers, M. D. 1988. Iridoid glycosides as oviposition stimulants for the buckeye butterfly, Junonia coenia (Nymphalidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 14:917–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rhoades, D. F. 1979. Evolution of plant chemical defense against herbivores, pp. 3–54, in G. A. Rosenthal and D. H. Janzen (eds.). Herbivores: Their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Roddick, J. G. 1974. The steroidal glycoalkaloid tomatine. Phytochemistry 13:9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rombouts, J. E. and Links, J. 1956. The chemical nature of the antibacterial substance present in Aucuba japonica Thunbg. Experientia 12:78–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sagar, G. R. and Harper, J. L. 1964. Biological flora of the British Isles. Plantago major L., P. media L. and P. lanceolata L. J. Ecol. 52:189–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sinden, S. L., Groth, R. W., and O'Brien, M. J. 1973. Effect of tomato alkaloids on the growth of Alternaria solani and their possible role as resistance factors in potatoes. Phytopathology 63:303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sinden, S. L., Schalk, J. M., and Stoner, A. K. 1978. Effects of daylength and maturity of tomato plants on tomatine content and resistance to the Colorado potato beetle. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 103:596–600.Google Scholar
  56. Stamp, N. E. and Bowers, M. D. 1994. Effects of cages, plant age and mechanical clipping on plantain chemistry. Oecologia 99:66–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stamp, N. E. and Bowers, M. D. 1996. Consequences for plantain chemistry and growth when herbivores are attacked by predators. Ecology 77:535–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stamp, N.E. and Bowers, M.D. 2000. Do enemies of herbivores influence plant growth and chemistry? Evidence from a seminatural experiment. J. Chem. Ecol. 26:2367–2386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stermitz, F. R. 1988. Iridoid glycosides and aglycones as chiral synthons, bioactive compounds and Lepidopteran defenses, pp. 397–402, in H. G. Cutter (ed.) Biologically Active Natural Products. ACS Symposium 380. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stout, M. J. and Bostock, R.M. 2000. Specificity of induced responses to arthropods and pathogens, pp. 183–209, in A. A. Agrawal, S. Tuzun, and E. Bent (eds.). Induced Plant Defenses Against Herbivores. Biochemistry, Ecology, and Agriculture. APS Press, St. Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  61. Tuomi, J., NiemelÄ, P., Rousi, M., SirÄn, S., and Vuorisalo, T. 1988. Induced accumulation of foliage phenols in mountain birch: branch response to defoliation. Am. Nat. 132:602–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Van Der Sluis, W. G., Van Der Nat, J. M., and Labadie, R. P. 1983. Thin-layer chromatographic bioassay of iridoid and secoiridoid glucosides with a fungitoxic aglucone moiety using β-glucosidase and the fungus Penicillium expansum as a test organism. J. Chromatogr. 259:522–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Van Der Toorn, J., Ten Hove, H. J., and Van Eldijk, F. 1984. Transplant experiments with Plantago lanceolata. Progress Report 82, Institute for Ecological Research, Heteren, NL, pp. 39–44.Google Scholar
  64. Wink, M. 1984. Chemical defense of Leguminosae: are quinolizidine alkaloids part of the antimicrobial system of lupines ? Z. Naturforsch. C 39:548–552.Google Scholar
  65. Zangerl, A. R. and Berenbaum, M. R. 1990. Furanocoumarin induction in wild parsnip: genetics and populational variation. Ecology 71:1933–1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zangerl, A. R. and Rutledge, C. E. 1996. The probability of attack and patterns of constitutive and induced defense: a test of optimal defense theory. Am. Nat. 147:599–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hamida B. Marak
    • 1
  • Arjen Biere
    • 1
  • Jos M. M. Van Damme
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant Population BiologyNetherlands Institute of Ecology, NIOO-KNAWGA HeterenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options