Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 28, Issue 12, pp 2475–2482 | Cite as

Transport of Phenolic Compounds from Leaf Surface of Creosotebush and Tarbush to Soil Surface by Precipitation

  • P. W. Hyder
  • E. L. Fredrickson
  • R. E. Estell
  • M. E. Lucero


During the last 100 years, many desert grasslands have been replaced by shrublands. One possible mechanism by which shrubs outcompete grasses is through the release of compounds that interfere with neighboring plants. Our objective was to examine the movement of secondary compounds from the leaf surface of creosotebush and tarbush to surrounding soil surfaces via precipitation. Units consisting of a funnel and bottle were used to collect stemflow, throughfall, and interspace precipitation samples from 20 creosotebush (two morphotypes) and 10 tarbush plants during three summer rainfall events in 1998. Precipitation samples were analyzed for total phenolics (both species) and nordihydroguaiaretic acid (creosotebush only). Phenolics were detected in throughfall and stemflow of both species with stemflow containing greater concentrations than throughfall (0.088 and 0.086 mg/ml for stemflow and 0.022 and 0.014 mg/ml for throughfall in creosotebush morphotypes U and V, respectively; 0.044 and 0.006 mg/ml for tarbush stemflow and throughfall, respectively). Nordihydroguaiaretic acid was not found in any precipitation collections. The results show that phenolic compounds produced by creosotebush and tarbush can be transported to the soil surface by precipitation, but whether concentrations are ecologically significant is uncertain. Nordihydroguaiaretic acid was not present in the runoff from creosotebush.

Flourensia cernua Larrea tridentata nordihydroguaiaretic acid total phenolics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, S. 1994. Woody plant encroachment into southwestern grasslands and savannas: rates, patterns and proximate causes, pp. 13–68, in M. Vavra, W. A. Laycock, and R. D. Pieper (eds.). Ecological Implications of Livestock Herbivory in the West. Society for Range Management, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
  3. Barbour, M. G. 1967. Ecoclinal patterns in the physiological ecology of a desert shrub, Larrea divaricata. PhD dissertation. Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  4. Blum, U. 1998. Effects of microbial utilization of phenolic acids and their phenolic acid breakdown products on allelopathic interactions. J. Chem. Ecol. 24:685–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Botkin, C. W. and Duisberg, P. C. 1949. The nordihydroguaiaretic acid content of the creosote bush N.M. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 349.Google Scholar
  6. Buffington, L. C. and Herbel, C. H. 1965. Vegetational changes on a semi-desert grassland from 1858 to 1963. Ecol. Monogr. 35:139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox, J. R., Schreiber, H. A., and Morton, H. L. 1983. The initial growth of two range grasses on nonfertilized and fertilized soils collected from creosotebush communities in the southwestern United States. J. Range Manage. 36:726–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dalton, P. D., Jr. 1962. Ecology of the creosotebush Larrea tridentata (DC.) Cov. PhD dissertation. University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
  9. De Soyza, A. G., Whitford, W. G., Martinez-Meza, E. and Van Zee, J. W. 1997. Variation in creosotebush (Larrea tridentata) canopy morphology in relation to habitat, soil fertility and associated plant communities. Am. Midl. Nat. 137:13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Einhellig, F. A. 1987. Interactions among allelochemicals and other stress factors of the plant environment, in G. R. Waller (ed.). Allelochemicals: Role in Agriculture and Forestry. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  11. Elakovich, S. D. and Stevens, K. L. 1985. Phytotoxic properties of nordihydroguaiaretic acid, a lignan from Larrea tridentata (Creosotebush). J. Chem. Ecol. 11:27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Estell, R. E., Fredrickson, E. L., Anderson, D. M., Mueller, W. F., and Remmenga, M. D. 1994. Relationship of tarbush leaf surface secondary chemistry to livestock herbivory. J. Range Manage. 47:424–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Estell, R. E., Fredrickson, E. L., and Havstad. K. M. 1996. Chemical composition of Flourensia cernua at four growth stages. Grass Forage Sci. 51:434–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Friedman, J. 1987. Allelopathy in desert ecosystems, in G. R. Waller (ed.) pp. 53–68. Allelochemicals: Role in Agriculture and Forestry. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gallet, C. 1994. Allelopathic potential in bilberry-spruce forests: influence of phenolic compounds on spruce seedlings. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:1009–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gibbens, R. P. and Lenz. J.M. 2001. Root systems of some Chihuahuan Desert plants. J. Arid Environ. 49:221–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holechek, J. L., Munshikpu, A. V., Saiwana, L., Unez-Hernandez, G., Valdez, R., Wallace, J. D., and Cardenas, M. 1990. Influences of six shrub diets varying in phenol content on nitrogen retention by goats. Trop. Grasslands 24:93–98.Google Scholar
  18. Hyder, P.W., Fredrickson, E. L., Estell, R. E., Tellez, M. R., and Gibbens, R. P. 2002. Distribution and concentration of total phenolics, condensed tannins, and nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA) in creosotebush (Larrea tridentata). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 30:905–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Inderjit. 1996. Plant phenolics in allelopathy. Bot. Rev. 62:186–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Knipe, D. and Herbel, C. H. 1966. Germination and growth of some semidesert grassland species treated with aqueous extract from creosotebush. Ecology 47:775–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li, H., Inoue, M., Nishimura, H., Mizutani, J., and Tsuzuki, E. 1993. Interactions of trans-cinnamic acid, its related phenolic allelochemicals, and abscisic acid in seedling growth and seed germination of lettuce. J. Chem. Ecol. 19:1775–1787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mabry, T. J., Difeo, D. R., Jr., Sakakibara, M., Bohnstedt, C. F., Jr., and Seigler, D., 1977. The natural products chemistry of Larrea, pp. 115–134, in T. J. Mabry, J. H. Hunziker, and D. R. DiFeo, Jr. (eds.). Creosotebush: Biology and Chemistry of Larrea in NewWorld Deserts. Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  23. Martinez-Meza, E. and Whitford, W.G. 1996. Stemflow, throughfall and channelization of stemflow by roots in three Chihuahuan Desert shrubs. J. Arid Environ. 32:271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rhoades, D. F. 1977. The antiherbivore chemistry of Larrea, pp. 135–175, in T. J. Mabry, J. H. Hunziker, and D. R. DiFeo, Jr. (eds.). Creosotebush: Biology and Chemistry of Larrea in New World Deserts. Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  25. Shmida, A. and Whittaker, R. H. 1981. Pattern and biological microsite effects in two shrub communities, southern California. Ecology 62:234–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. SPSS. 1997. SPSS Software, Release 2.03. SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  27. Tromble, J. M. 1988. Water interception by two arid land shrubs. J. Arid Environ. 15:65–70.Google Scholar
  28. Welsh, R. G. and Beck, R. F. 1976. Some ecological relationships between creosotebush and bush muhly. J. Range Manage. 29:472–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. W. Hyder
    • 1
  • E. L. Fredrickson
    • 1
  • R. E. Estell
    • 1
  • M. E. Lucero
    • 1
  1. 1.Jornada Experimental RangeUSDA/ARSLas CrucesUSA

Personalised recommendations