Skip to main content
Log in

Different Intervals Between Vasectomy and Sperm Retrieval Interfere in the Reproductive Capacity from Vasectomized Men

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose : To evaluate the relationship between the postvasectomy period and sperm reproductive capacity after ICSI.

Methods : Seventy-seven ICSI cycles with percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) were reviewed. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to the interval after vasectomy: 0 – 5 years (G1); 6 – 8 years (G2); 9 – 14 years (G3), and >15 years (G4).

Results : Clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates did not correlate significantly with the time period of vasectomy until 14 years. Although the higher implantation rate observed in G1, no significant differences were noted among Groups 1–3. The miscarriage rates increased from G1 to G4, reaching a statistical significance among G1, G2, and G3 compared with G4. When groups were also divided according to the maternal age, the same results were obtained.

Conclusions : The interval between the vasectomy and the sperm retrieval procedure has no effect on the outcome until the interval of 14 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Wilson EW: Sterilization. Baillie're's Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 1996;10(1):103–119

    Google Scholar 

  2. Potts JM, Pasqualotto FF, Nelson D, et al.: Patients characteristics associated with vasectomy reversal. J Urol 1999;161:1835–1838

    Google Scholar 

  3. Belker AM, Thomas AJ Jr, Fuchs EF, Konnak JW, Sharlip ID: Results of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the vasovasostomy study group. J Urol 1991;145:505–511

    Google Scholar 

  4. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A: Pregnancy after intracytoplasmic injection of a single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 1992;304(8810):17–18

    Google Scholar 

  5. Van Steirteghem AC, Nagy Z, Joris, et al.: High fertilization and implantation rates after intacytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1061–1066

    Google Scholar 

  6. Urry RL, Heaton JB, Moore M, et al.: A fifteen-year study of alterations in semen quality occurring after vasectomy reversal. Fertil Steril 1990;53:341–345

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kolettis P, Sharma RK, Pasqualotto FF, Thomas AJ, Agarval A: The effect of seminal oxidative stress on fertility after vasectomy reversal. Fertil Steril 1999;71(2):249–255

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pasqualotto FF, Sharma RK, Nelson DR, Thomas AJ Jr, Agarwal A: Relationship between oxidative stress, semen characteristics, and clinical diagnosis in men undergoing infertility investigation. Fertil Steril 2000;73(3):459–464

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heidenreich A, Bonfig R, Wilbert DM, Strohmaier WL, Engelmann UH: Risk factors for antisperm antibodies in infertile men. Am J Reprod Immunol 1994;31:69–76

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sukcharoen N, Sithipravej T, Promviengchai S, Chinpilas V, Boonkasemsanti W: No differences in outcome of surgical sperm retrieval with intracytoplasmic sperm injection at different intervals after vasectomy. Fertil Steril 2000;74:174–17

    Google Scholar 

  11. Abdelmassih V, Balmaceda JP, Tesarik J, Abdelmassih R, Nagy PN: Relationship between time period after vasectomy and the reproductive capacity of sperm obtaibed by epididymal aspiration. Hum Reprod 2002;17(3):736–740

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goldstein M: Vasectomy reversal. Comp Ther 1993;19:37

    Google Scholar 

  13. Berardinucci D, Zini A, Jarvi K: Outcome of microsurgical reconstruction in men with suspected epididymal obstruction [Comment]. J Urol 1998;159(3):831–834

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jarow JP: Epididymovasostomy. Microsurgery 1995;16(5):333–338

    Google Scholar 

  15. Matthews GJ, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M: Patency following microsurgical vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy: Temporal considerations. J Urol 1995;154:2070–2073

    Google Scholar 

  16. Niederberger C, Ross LS: Microsurgical epididymosvasostomy: Predictors of success. J Urol 1993;149(5 pt 2):1364–1367

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas AJ Jr: Vasoepididymostomy. Urol Clin North Am 1987;14(3):527–538

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pasqualotto FF, Agarwal Srivastava M, Nelson DR, Thomas AJ Jr: Fertility outcome after repeat vasoepididymosomy. J Urol 1999;162(5):1626–1628

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kidd CF, Fuchs EF: Pregnancy rate after vasectomy reversal as a function of the female partner's age [abstract n° 1262]. In Programs and abstracts from AUA, Anaheim, CA. Am Urol Assoc 2001;165(5):307

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pasqualotto FF, Rossi-Ferragut LM, Rocha CC, Medeiros ARC, Santos, D.R., et al.: Sperm retrieval and fertilization in repeated percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration. In Procedings of the VIIth International Congress of Andrology, Canada, 2001, pp. 261–265

  21. Johnson L, Petty CS, Neaves WB: Influence of age on sperm production and testicular weights in men. J Reprod Fertil 1984;70(1):211–218

    Google Scholar 

  22. Silber SJ: Effect of age on male fertility. Semin Reprod Endocrinol 1991;9(3):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kidd SA, Eskenazi B, Wyrobek AJ: Effects of male age on semen quality and fertility: A review of the literature. Fertil Steril 2001;75(2):237–248

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borges, E., Rossi-Ferragut, L.M., Pasqualotto, F.F. et al. Different Intervals Between Vasectomy and Sperm Retrieval Interfere in the Reproductive Capacity from Vasectomized Men. J Assist Reprod Genet 20, 33–37 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021210805867

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021210805867

Navigation