Skip to main content
Log in

Properties of rice soils affecting methane production potentials: 2. Differences in topsoil and subsoil

  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Methane (CH4) is one of the important greenhouse gases accounting for 15% of the total enhanced greenhouse effect. A laboratory experiment was conducted with nine soils from the Philippines and two soils from India to determine the CH4 production potential of topsoil and subsoil, and to assess the role of different fractions of soil organic C in influencing CH4 production potential. CH4 production potentials of topsoils varied in a wide range from 20 μg g−1 soil (Urdaneta soil) to 837 μg g−1 soil (Pila soil) over 100 d of incubation. In contrast, CH4 production potentials of subsoils were low (< 2 μg g−1 soil over 100 d of incubation). The topsoil was the main source of CH4 in the flooded rice soils contributing 99.95% to the total CH4 production while the subsoil contributed negligibly (0.05%). CH4 production potentials of the topsoils showed significant correlation with cation exchange capacity (CEC), total N and available K contents of soils. For the subsoils, CH4 production potentials had a significant correlation with available P and clay contents of the soils. Considering the differences in all the soil properties and the CH4 production potentials between topsoils and subsoils, a significant relationship of CH4 production potential with CEC, available K and enriched C (extra C content of topsoil compared to that of subsoil) was obtained. Two carbon fractions, water soluble C (H2O-C) and carbon mineralised under anaerobic conditions (AnMC) affected total CH4 production indirectly rather than directly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adhya TK, Patnaik P, Satpathy SN, Kumaraswamy S & Sethunathan N (1998) Influence of phosphorous application on methane emission and production in flooded paddy soils. Soil Biol Biochem 30: 177–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijay-Singh, Ryden JC & Whitehead DC (1988) Some relationships between denitrification potential and fractions of organic C in air-dried and field-moist soils. Soil Biol Biochem 20: 737–741

    Google Scholar 

  • Burford JR & Bremner JM (1975) Relationships between the denitrification capacities of soils and total, water-soluble and readily decomposable soil organic matter. Soil Biol Biochem 7: 389–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Chidthaisong A, Inubushi K & Watanabe I (1996) Methanogenic characteristics of flooded rice soils in response to glucose amendment. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 42: 645–649

    Google Scholar 

  • Chidthaisong A, Obata H & Watanabe I (1999) Methane formation and substrate utilisation in anaerobic rice soils as affected by fertilisation. Soil Biol Biochem 31: 135–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Denier van der Gon H, Neue HU, Lantin RS, Wassmann R, Alberto MCR, Aduna JB & Tan MJ (1992) Controlling factors of methane emission from rice fields. In: Batjes NH & Bridges EM (eds) World Inventory of Soil Emission Potentials, WISE Rep 2, pp 81–92. ISRIC, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann D (2001) Update the global trends in long-lived greenhouse gases. In: Climate Monitoring & Diagnostics Laboratory FY 2001 3rd Quarter Milestone — predict and assess decadal-to-centennial climate change

  • Inubushi K, Umebayashi M & Wada H (1990) Methane emission from paddy fields. In: Transactions 14th International Congress of Soil Science, pp 249–254. Kyoto II

  • IPCC 2001 A special report of IPCC working group III: Summary for policymakers, emission scenarios. Eds. Nebojs a Nakićenović, Ogunlade Davidson, Gerald Davis, Arnulf Grübler, Tom Kram, Emilio Lebre La Rovere, Bert Metz, Tsuneyuki Morita, William Pepper, Hugh Pitcher, Alexei Sankovski, Priyadarshi Shukla, Robert Swart, Robert Watson and Zhou Dadi. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Kimura M (1992) Methane emission from paddy soils in Japan and Thailand. In: Batjes NH & Bridges EM (eds) World Inventory of Soil Emission Potentials, WISE Rep 2, pp 43–79. ISRIC, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindau CW, Wickersham P, DeLaune RD, Colliins JW, Bollick PK, Scott LM & Lambremont EN (1998) Methane and nitrous oxide evolution and 15N and 226 Ra uptake as affected by application of gypsum and phosphogypsum to Louisiana rice. Agric Ecosyst Environ 68: 165–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra S, Wassmann R, Jain MC & Pathak H (2002) Properties of rice soils affecting methane production potentials: 1. Temporal patterns and diagnostic procedures. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 64: 169–182 (this issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neue HU, Heidmann PB & Scharpenseel HW (1990) Organic matter dynamics, soil properties, and cultural practices in rice lands and their relationship to methane production. In: Bouman AF (ed), Soil and the Greenhouse Effect, pp 457–466. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Oremland RM (1988) Biogeochemistry of methanogenic bacteria. In: Zehnder AJB (ed) Biology of anaerobic micro organismsmicroorganisms, pp 641–706. John Wiley Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Papen H & Rennenberg H (1990) Microbial processes involved in emissions of radiatively important trace gases. In: Transactions 14th International Congress of Soil Science, pp 232–237. Kyoto II

  • Patrick WH Jr & De Laune RD (1977) Chemical and biological redox systems affecting nutrient availability in the coastal wetlands. Geoscience and Man 18: 131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponnamperuma FN (1972) The chemistry of submerged soils. Adv Agron 24: 29–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinn RG (1994) Global atmospheric-biospheric chemistry. In: Prinn RG (ed) Global atmospheric-Bioshperic Chemistry, pp 1–18. New York: Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennenberg H, Wassmann R, Papen H & Seiler W (1992) Trace gas exchange in rice cultivation. Ecol Bull 42: 164–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy R, Klüber HD & Conrad RF (1997) Early initiation of methane production in anoxic soil despite the presence of oxidants. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 12: 311–320

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1988) SAS/STAT User's Guide, 6.03 edn, SAS Institute, Cary NC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Segers R (1998) Methane production and methane consumption: a review of processes underlying wetland methane flux. Biogeochem 41: 23–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Takai Y & Wada E (1990) Methane formation in waterlogged paddy soils and its controlling factors. In: Scharpenseel HW, Schomaker M & Ayoub A (eds) Soils on a Warmer Earth. Developments in Soil Science, Vol 20 pp 101–107. Elsevier

  • Wang B, Xu Y, Wang Z, Li Z, Ding Y & Guo Y (1999) Methane production potentials of twenty-eight rice soils in China. Biol Fertil Soils 29: 74–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZP, Lindau CW, De Laune RD & Patrick WH Jr (1993) Methane emission and entrapment in flooded rice soils as affected by soil properties. Biol Fertil Soils 16: 163–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassmann R, Neue HU, Bueno C, Lantin RS, Alberto MCR, Buendia LV, Bronson K, Papen H & Rennenberg H (1998) Methane production capacities of different rice soils derived from inherent and exogenous substrates. Plant Soil 203: 227–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe A & Kimura M (1999) Influence of chemical properties of soils on methane emission from rice paddies. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 21: 2449–2463

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson TW, Goulding KWT & Powlson DS (1995) Effect of land-use change and methane mixing ratio on methane uptake form United Kingdom soil. Global Change Biol 1: 209–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Wang Z, Li Z, Guo, Y & Wang B (1997) Methane production potentials of two rice soils as affected by applications of fertilizers. Acta Agron Sin 23: 271–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagi K & Minami K (1990) Effects of organic matter application on methane emission from some Japanese paddy fields. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 36: 599–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagi K, Minami K & Ogawa Y (1990) Effects of water percolation on methane emission from paddy fields. Res Rep Div Environ Planning, Natl Inst Agro-Environ Sci 6: 105–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao H, Conrad R, Wassmann R & Neue HU (1999) Effect of soil characteristics on sequential reduction and methane production in sixteen rice paddy soils from China, the Philippines and Italy. Biogeochemistry 47: 269–295

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitra, S., Wassmann, R., Jain, M.C. et al. Properties of rice soils affecting methane production potentials: 2. Differences in topsoil and subsoil. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 64, 183–191 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021175404418

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021175404418

Navigation