Skip to main content
Log in

Chemical genomics: massively parallel technologies for rapid lead identification and target validation

  • Published:
Cytotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chemical genomics is a new research paradigm with importantapplications in drug discovery. It links genomic targets withsmall-molecule chemistries thereby allowing for efficient targetvalidation and lead compound identification. ACADIA'schemical-genomics platform consists of a large and diverse small-moleculelibrary (800,000), a reference drug library (2,000), druggablegenomic targets (>300) and a cell-based functional assaytechnology (R-SATTM; Receptor Selection and AmplificationTechnology) that allows for ultra-high throughput screening(>500,000 data points/week) as well as high throughputpharmacology and profiling over a wide range of targets. Twoexamples are presented that illustrate the success of ourchemical-genomics approach: (i) The validation of inverse agonismat serotonin 5-HT2A receptors as an antipsychotic mechanismand the subsequent discovery of potent and selectively acting 5-HT2A inverse agonists, currently in preclinical development,and (ii) the discovery of the first ectopically binding subtype-selective muscarinic m1 agonist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Caron PR, Mullican MD, Mashal RD, Wilson KP, Su MS & Murcko MA (2001) Chemogenomics: a gene family approach to parallel drug discover. Drug Discovery World 2: 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croston GE (2002) Functional and Cell-Based uHTS in Chemical Genomic Drug Discovery. Trends Biotech 20:110–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debouck C & Metcalf B (2000) The impact of genomics on drug discovery. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 40: 193–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drews J & Ryser S (1996) Innovation deficit in the pharmaceutical industry. Drug Info J 30: 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drews J (2000) Drug discovery: A historical perspective. Science 287: 1960–1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eglen, ME, Choppin A, Dillon MP & Hegde S (1999) Muscarinic receptor ligands and their therapeutic potential. Curr Op Chem Biol 3: 426–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris S & Foord SM (2000) Transgenic gene knock-outs: functional genomics and therapeutic target selection. Pharmacogenomics 1: 433–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander ES et al. (2001) Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409: 860–921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landro JA, Taylor ICA, Stirtan WG, Osterman DG, Kristie J, Hunnicutt EJ, Rae PMM & Sweetnam PM (2000) HTS of the new millennium. The role of pharmacology and flexibility. J Pharmacol Toxicol Method 44:273–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz GR, Nash HM & Jindal S (2000) Chemical ligands, genomics and drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today 5: 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messier TL, Dorman CM, Brauner-Osborne H, Eubanks D & Brann MR (1995) High throughput assays of cloned adrenergic, muscarinic, neurokinin, and neurotrophin receptors in living mammalian cells. Pharmacol Toxicol 76: 308–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey A & Mann M (2000) Proteomics to study genes and genomes. Nature 405: 837–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalding TA, Trotter C, Skjærbæck N, Messier TL, Currier EA, Burstein ES, Li D, Hacksell U & Brann MR (2002) Discovery of an Ectopic Activation Site on the m1 Muscarinic Receptor. Mol Pharmacol 61: 1297–1302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymkowski DE (2001) Too many targets, not enough target validation. Drug Discovery Today 6: 397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triggle DJ (2000) Pharmacological receptors: a century of discovery – and more. Pharm Acta Helv 74: 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venter JC et al. (2001) The Sequence of the human genome. Science 5507: 1304–1351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner DM, Burstein ES, Nash N, Croston GE, Currier EA, Vanover KE, Harvey SC, Donohue E, Hansen HC, Andersson CA, Spalding TA, Gibson DFC, Krebs-Thomson K, Powell SB, Geyer MA, Hacksell U & Brann M (2001) 5-Hydroxytryptamine2a Receptor Agonists as Antipsychotics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 299: 268–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson TM, Jones SA, Moore JT & Kliewer SA (2001) Chemical-genomics: Functional analysis of orphan nuclear receptors in the regulation of bile acid metabolism. Med Res Rev 21: 513–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood MD, Murkitt KL, Ho M, Watson JM, Brown F, Huner AJ & Middlemiss DN (1999) Functional comparison of muscarinic partial agonists at muscarinic receptor subtypes hM1, hM2, hM3, hM4 and hM5 using microphysiometry. Br J Pharmacol 126: 1620–1624.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uli Hacksell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hacksell, U., Nash, N., Burstein, E.S. et al. Chemical genomics: massively parallel technologies for rapid lead identification and target validation. Cytotechnology 38, 3–10 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021169023731

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021169023731

Navigation