Skip to main content
Log in

The Presence of Hydrosalpinx May Not Adversely Affect the Implantation and Pregnancy Rates in In Vitro Fertilization Treatment

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of hydrosalpinx on the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment, a retrospective study was undertaken at a tertiary referral center for infertility.

Methods: Results of the first IVF treatment cycles in 144 patients from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1995, who had tubal infertility only and were less than 38 years old, were reviewed. The duration/dosage of hMG used, serum estradiol level on the day of hCG, number of oocytes aspirated and fertilized, number of embryos replaced, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and pregnancy outcome were compared in patients with and without hydrosalpinx.

Results: The mean implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate were similar in patients with or without hydrosalpinx. Both groups had similar ovarian responses and fertilization rates. There was no increase in clinical abortion in the hydrosalpinx group but ectopic pregnancies were more common in patients with hydrosalpinx.

Conclusions: The presence of hydrosalpinx did not adversely affect the implantation and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization treatment when the results of the first cycle were compared. However, it can lead to a higher incidence of ectopic pregnancies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG: Birth after reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet 1978;2:366

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lenton EA, Cooke ID, Hooper M, King H, Kumar A, Monks N, et al.: In vitro fertilization in the natural cycle. Bailliere Clin Obstet Gynecol 1992;6:229–245

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marcus SF, Brinsden PR: Analysis of the incidence and risk factors associated with ectopic pregnancy following in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1995;10:199–203

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andersen AN, Zhou Y, Fan JM, Petersen K: Low implantation rate after in-vitro fertilization in patients with hydrosalpinges diagnosed by ultrasonography. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1935–1938

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kassabji M, Sims JA, Butler L, Muasher SJ: Reduced pregnancy outcome in patients with unilateral or bilateral hydrosalpinx after in vitro fertilization. Eur J Obstet Gynecol 1994;56:129–132

    Google Scholar 

  6. Strandell A, Waldenstrom U, Nilsson L, Hamberger L: Hydrosalpinx reduces in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod 1994;9:861–863

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vandromme J, Chasse E, Lejeune B, Rysselberge MV, Delvigne A, Leroy F: Hydrosalpinges in in-vitro fertilization: an unfavourable prognostic feature. Hum Reprod 1995;10:576–579

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fleming C, Hull MGR: Impaired implantation after in vitro fertilization treatment associated with hydrosalpinx. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:268–272

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sharara FI, Scott RT Jr, Marut EL, Queenan JT Jr: In-vitro fertilization outcome in women with hydrosalpinx. Hum Reprod 1996;11:526–530

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Sattar MA, Awad MM, Amin Y: Transvaginal ultrasonic needle guided aspiration of pelvic inflammatory cystic masses before ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1990;53:311–314

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI, Riad R: Fluid accumulation of the uterine cavity before embryo transfer: A possible hindrance for implantation. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1991;8:157–159

    Google Scholar 

  12. Russell JB, Rodriguez Z, Komins JI: The use of transvaginal ultrasound to aspirate bilateral hydrosalpinges prior to in vitro fertilization: A case report. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1991;8:213–215

    Google Scholar 

  13. Andersen AN, Lindhard A, Loft A, Ziebe S, Andersen CY: The infertile patient with hydrosalpinges-IVF with or without salpingectomy? Hum Reprod 1996;10:2081–2084

    Google Scholar 

  14. Csemiczky G, Landgren BM, Fried G, Wramsby H: High tubal damage grade is associated with low pregnancy rate in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Reprod 1996;11:2438–2440

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gurgan T, Urman B, Yarali H: Results of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in women with infertility due to genital tuberculosis. Fertil Steril 1996;65:367–370

    Google Scholar 

  16. Edwards RG: Why are agonadal and post-amenorrhoeic women so fertile after oocyte donation? Hum Reprod 1992;7:733–734

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jones RB, Mammel JB, Shepard MK: Recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis from the endometrium of women at risk for chlamydial infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;155:35–39

    Google Scholar 

  18. Devoto L, Pino AM, Heras JL, Soto E, Gunther A: Estradiol and progesterone nuclear and cytosol receptors of hydrosalpinx. Fertil Steril 1984;42:594–597

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shelton KE, Butler L, Toner JP, Oehninger S, Muasher SJ: Salpingectomy improves the pregnancy rate in in-vitro fertilization patients with hydrosalpinx. Hum Reprod 1996;11:523–525

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dubuisson JB, Foulot H, Aubriot FX, Mandelbrot L, Mathieu L, de Joliniere JB: Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in 556 pregnancies after in vitro fertilization: Implications for preventive management. Fertil Steril 1991;56:686–690

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hung-Yu Ng, E., Shu-Biu Yeung, W. & Ho, PC. The Presence of Hydrosalpinx May Not Adversely Affect the Implantation and Pregnancy Rates in In Vitro Fertilization Treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet 14, 508–512 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021123309392

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021123309392

Navigation