Skip to main content
Log in

The Discipline and Habit of Theological Reflection

  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes the process of theological reflection and the necessity of its practice in the formation of pastoral identity and development of ministry. Drawing upon the philosophy of C.S. Peirce, pastoral theology of the past twenty-five years, and the authors' clinical and classroom experiences, the essay illuminates the distinctive work of pastoral care givers that makes them unique in health care settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pruyser, P.W., The Minister as Diagnostician: Personal Problems in Pastoral Perspective. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1976; Oden, T.C., Pastoral Theology: Essentials of Ministry. San Francisco and New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 1983; Kinast, R.L., “A Process Model of Theological Reflection,” The Journal of Pastoral Care, 1983, 37, p. 144; Patton, J., From Ministry to Theology: Pastoral Action & Reflection. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1990; rpt. Journal of Pastoral Care Publications, Inc., 1995; Lester, A.D., Hope in Pastoral Care and Counseling. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thayer, N.S.T., Spirituality and Pastoral Care. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1985, p. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Killen, P.O. and J. De Beer, The Art of Theological Reflection. New York: The Crossroad. Publishing Company, 1995, p. viii.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Idem.

    Google Scholar 

  5. This is consistent with Monika Hellwig's assertion that it is not only the experiences, questions, and answers of western-educated academics as well as the history of Christian thought that are the valid and legitimate sources in “action-reflection” modes of learning. Hellwig, M., Whose Experience Counts in Theological Reflection? Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, J.E., Purpose and Thought: The Meaning of Pragmatism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978, p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Colapietro, V.M., Pierce's Approach to the Self: A Semiotic Perspective on Human Subjectivity. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1989, pp. 55, 73.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid., p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For different frameworks used in making such assessments see: Fitchett, G., Assessing Spiritual Needs: A Guide for Caregivers. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 1993; Murray, J.L., “Spiritual Assessment Guide,” Department of Chaplaincy Services and Clinical Pastoral Education Program Manual and Handbook. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Health System, 1997; rpt. 2000–2001, p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A model process for the care giver to use in exploring his or her relationship with God can be found in Murray, J.L., “Relationship with God as a Dimension of Pastoral Supervision,” Journal of Supervision and Training in Ministry, 1997, 18, p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lebacqz, K., Ethics and Spiritual Care: A Guide for Pastors, Chaplains, and Spiritual Directors. Nashville: Abindgon Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warren, H.A., Murray, J.L. & Best, M.M. The Discipline and Habit of Theological Reflection. Journal of Religion and Health 41, 323–331 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021122409771

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021122409771

Navigation