, Volume 38, Issue 1–3, pp 77–85 | Cite as

Optimisation of protein expression and establishment of the Wave Bioreactor for Baculovirus/insect cell culture

  • Wilfried Weber
  • Eric Weber
  • Sabine Geisse
  • Klaus Memmert


As the interest of research is beginning to shift from genomicsto proteomics the number of proteins to be expressed is rapidlyincreasing. To do so, well-established, high-level expressionsystems and rapid, cost-effective production means are needed. For addressing the latter, a novel cultivation system for recombinant cells, the Wave Bioreactor™ has recently becomeavailable. We describe the set-up and the optimisation of parameters essential for successful operation and growth of insect cells to high cell densities in the Wave Bioreactor. According to our experience, the Cellbag™ system comparesvery favorably to conventional cultivation vessels such as bioreactors and roller cultures with respect to simplicity ofoperation and cost. Additionally, we developed a rapid and simple protocol for assessing expression and production conditions for the Baculovirus/insect cell system applicable to many different genes/proteins. Important parameters like MOI,TOI, peak cell density (PCD) and expression levels are determinedin pre-experiments on small scale to achieve optimal expressionof a given protein. These conditions are subsequently transformedand applied to large scale cultures grown in nutrient-supplemented medium in the Wave Bioreactor.

baculovirus/insect cell system essential parameters for operation expression optimisation feeding strategies Wave Bioreactor 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bédard C, Kamen AA, Tom R & Massie B (1994) Maximization of recombinant protein yield in the Insect Cell/Baculovirus system by one-time addition of nutrients to high-density batch cultures. Cytotechnology 15: 129–138.Google Scholar
  2. Bleijs DA, Geijtenbeek TBH, Figdor CG & van Kooyk Y (2001) DC-SIGN and LFA-1: A battle for ligand. Trends Immunol 22: 457–463.Google Scholar
  3. Chan LCL, Greenfield PF & Reid S (1998) Optimising fed-batch production of recombinant proteins using the Baculovirus Expression Vector System. Biotechnol Bioeng 59: 178–188.Google Scholar
  4. Elias CB, Zeiser A, Bédard C & Kamen AA (2000) Enhanced growth of Sf-9 cells to a maximum density of 5.2 × 107 cells per ml and production of β-Galactosidase at high cell density by fed batch culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 68: 381–388.Google Scholar
  5. Ikonomou L, Bastin G, Schneider G & Agathos SN (2001) Design of an efficient medium for insect cell growth and recombinant protein production. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Animal 37: 549–559.Google Scholar
  6. Kamen AA, Bédard C, Tom R, Perret S & Jardin B (1996) On-line monitoring of respiration in recombinant Baculovirus-infected and uninfected cell bioreactor cultures. Biotechnol Bioeng 50: 36–48.Google Scholar
  7. King LA & Possee RD (1992) The Baculovirus Expression System. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  8. Kost TA & Condreay JP (1999) Recombinant baculoviruses as expression vectors for insect and mammalian cells. Curr Opinion Biotechnol 10: 428–433.Google Scholar
  9. Licari P & Bailey JE (1991) Factors influencing recombinant protein yields in an Insect Cell-Baculovirus Expression System: Multiplicity of Infection and intracellular protein degradation. Biotechnol Bioeng 37: 238–246.Google Scholar
  10. Licari P & Bailey JE (1992) Modeling the population dynamics of Baculovirus-infected insect cells: Optimizing infection strategies for enhanced recombinant protein yields. Biotechnol Bioeng 39: 432–441.Google Scholar
  11. Petricevich VL, Palomares LA, Gonzalez M & Ramirez OT (2001) Parameters that determine virus adsorption kinetics: toward the design of better infection strategies for the insect cell – baculovirus expression system. Enzyme Microb Technol 29: 52–61.Google Scholar
  12. Power JF, Reid S, Radford KM, Greenfield PF & Nielsen LK (1994) Modeling and optimization of the Baculovirus Expression Vector System in batch suspension culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 44: 710-719.Google Scholar
  13. Savary A, Georges B & Auriault C (1999) Adaptation of BTI-TN5B1-4 (High Five) insect cells for large-scale production in a stirred bioreactor. BioTechniques 27: 448–450.Google Scholar
  14. Singh V, (1999) Disposable bioreactor for cell culture using wave-induced agitation. Cytotechnology 30: 149–158.Google Scholar
  15. Taticek RA & Shuler ML (1997) Effect of elevated oxygen and glutamine levels on foreign protein production at high cell densities using the insect cell-baculovirus expression system. Biotechnol Bioeng 54: 142–152.Google Scholar
  16. Vaughn JL, Goodwin RH, Tompkins GJ & McCawley P (1977) The establishment of two cell lines from the insect Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera; Noctuidae). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 13: 213–217.Google Scholar
  17. Wong KTK, Peter CH, Greenfield PF, Reid S & Nielsen LK (1996) Low multiplicity infection of insect cells with a recombinant Baculovirus: The Cell Yield Concept. Biotechnol Bioeng 49: 659–666.Google Scholar
  18. Zeiser A, Elias CB, Voyer R, Jardin B & Kamen AA (2000) On-line monitoring of physiological parameters of insect cell cultures during the growth and infection process. Biotechnol Prog 16: 803–808.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wilfried Weber
    • 1
  • Eric Weber
    • 1
  • Sabine Geisse
    • 1
  • Klaus Memmert
    • 1
  1. 1.Core Technologies/Biomolecules ProductionNovartis Pharma AG, ResearchBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations