Advertisement

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 16, Issue 9, pp 463–467 | Cite as

What Is the Best Strategy for Presenting ART Results? A Controversial Comment

  • G. L. Driscoll
  • J. P. P. Tyler
Article
  • 18 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Driscoll GL, Tyler JPP, Carpenter D: Variation in the determination of follicular diameter: An interunit pilot study using an ultrasonic phantom. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2465-2468Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clark AM, Ledger W, Galletly C, Tomlinson L, Blaney F, Wang X, Norman RJ: Weight loss results in significant improvement in pregnancy and ovulation rates in anovulatory obese women. Hum Reprod 1995;10:2705-2712Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bovin J, Takefman JE: Stress level across stages of in vitro fertilisation in subsequently pregnant and nonpregnant women. Fertil Steril 1995;64:802-810Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schoysman R: Plea for realism and honesty in results of infertility treatment. Hum Reprod 1996;11:695-697Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hurst T, Shafir E, Lancaster P: Assisted Conception, Australia and New Zealand 1996 (Assisted Conception Series, No 3). Sydney: AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit, 1997Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Naaktgeboren N, Broers FC, Heijnsbroek I, Oudshoorn E, Verburg H, Van der Westerlaken L: Hard to believe, hardly discussed, nevertheless very important for the IVF/ICSI results: Embryo transfer technique can double or halve the pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod 12, Abstract Book 1, 1997, Abstract P-061, p 149Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. L. Driscoll
    • 1
  • J. P. P. Tyler
    • 1
  1. 1.City West IVFWestmeadAustralia

Personalised recommendations