Skip to main content
Log in

How to Present ART Results: Do We Need a Gold Standard?

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Schoysman R: Plea for realism and honesty in results of infertility treatment. Hum Reprod 1996;11:695-697

    Google Scholar 

  2. Oliveness F, Frydman R: The A.R.T. of embroidery. Hum Reprod 1996;11:699-700

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hurst T, Shafir E, Lancaster P: Assisted conception, Australia and New Zealand 1996 (Assisted Conception Series No. 3). Sydney, AIWH National Perinatal Statistics Unit, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schulman JD: What's your success rate? Dr X comes to America. Hum Reprod 1996;11:697-699

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lancaster P, de Mouzon J: World collaborative report on in-vitro fertilization. Preliminary date for 1995. J Assist Reprod Genet 1997; 14(Suppl): 251S-265S

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ben-Schlomo I, Wiener-Megnagi Z, Golan J, Eyali V, Geslevich J, Shalev E: Individual implantation rate: Proposal for a new index for evaluation of assisted reproduction results. Fertil Steril 1997;68:816-819

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saunders, D.M. How to Present ART Results: Do We Need a Gold Standard?. J Assist Reprod Genet 16, 474–475 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020546932010

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020546932010

Navigation