Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 16, Issue 9, pp 474–475 | Cite as

How to Present ART Results: Do We Need a Gold Standard?

  • D. M. Saunders


  1. 1.
    Schoysman R: Plea for realism and honesty in results of infertility treatment. Hum Reprod 1996;11:695-697Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oliveness F, Frydman R: The A.R.T. of embroidery. Hum Reprod 1996;11:699-700Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hurst T, Shafir E, Lancaster P: Assisted conception, Australia and New Zealand 1996 (Assisted Conception Series No. 3). Sydney, AIWH National Perinatal Statistics Unit, 1998Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schulman JD: What's your success rate? Dr X comes to America. Hum Reprod 1996;11:697-699Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lancaster P, de Mouzon J: World collaborative report on in-vitro fertilization. Preliminary date for 1995. J Assist Reprod Genet 1997; 14(Suppl): 251S-265SGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ben-Schlomo I, Wiener-Megnagi Z, Golan J, Eyali V, Geslevich J, Shalev E: Individual implantation rate: Proposal for a new index for evaluation of assisted reproduction results. Fertil Steril 1997;68:816-819Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. M. Saunders
    • 1
  1. 1.Royal North Shore Hospital and University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations