Are the Australian ART Results as Poor as They Appear?
- 19 Downloads
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Wood C, Trounson A, Leeton J, Talbot JMc, Buttery B, Webb J, Wood J, Jessup D: A clinical assessment of nine pregnancies obtained by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1981;35:502-508Google Scholar
- 2.Hurst T, Shafir E, Lancaster P: Assisted Conception Australia and New Zealand 1996 (Assisted Conception Series No 3). Australian Institute of Health and Welfare National Perinatal Statistics Unit and Fertility Society of Australia, 1997Google Scholar
- 3.Yovich JL, Matson PL: The treatment of infertility by the high intrauterine insemination of husband's washed spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1988;3:939-943Google Scholar
- 4.Yovich JL, Yovich JM, Edirisinghe WR: The relative chance of pregnancy following tubal or uterine transfer procedures. Fertil Steril 1988;49:858-864Google Scholar
- 5.Lancaster P, Shafir E, Hurst T, Huang J: Assisted Conception Australia and New Zealand 1994 and 1995 (Assisted Conception Series No 2). Australian Institute of Health and Welfare National Perinatal Statistics Unit and Fertility Society of Australia, 1997Google Scholar
- 6.Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority: HFEA Fifth Annual Report, 1996Google Scholar
- 7.American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology: Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1994 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil Steril 1996;66:697-705Google Scholar
- 8.MacDoughall MJ, Tan SL, Jacobs HS: In-vitro fertilization and the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Hum Reprod 1992;7(5):597-600Google Scholar
© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999