Abstract
Purpose: Sperm cells have been shown to take up exogenous DNA readily. The hypothesis was that sperm washing would remove exogenous viral DNA infecting sperm cells. The objective was to compare three types of sperm washing procedures for their capacity to remove exogenous human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA from infected sperm.
Methods: Prewashed sperm were equally divided and sperm in one portion were exposed to L1 HPV DNA fragments for 30 min at 37°C. Untreated washed sperm served as the control. After transfection, the sperm were washed by either centrifuge, two-layer Isolate colloid wash, or test-yolk buffer procedures. Sperm parameters were measured on a Hamilton Thorn HTM-C analyzer. Sperm DNA were extracted and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out targeting the L1 consensus gene of HPV and the designated sentinel gene, 17q21 spanning the D17S855 gene. Amplified products were analyzed in 2% agarose gel electrophoresis.
Results: PCR analyses detected the consensus L1 HPV gene in sperm after they were processed through either of the three procedures. Controls were negative for the L1 gene. Extracted DNA were verified by PCR amplification of 17q21 spanning the D17S855 gene. Transfected sperm had higher percentages of total motility and progression compared with the control. Centrifuged, washed, transfected sperm exhibited a greater curvilinear velocity and hyperactivation.
Conclusions: The data showed that washing would not remove exogenous HPV DNA from sperm cells. The viral DNA was tenaciously bound to the sperm, suggesting an internalization into the sperm. The viral DNA also increased the motility of the sperm by affecting the velocity and progression of the sperm, which suggested either an increase in metabolism, an enhancement of the calcium-regulated motility mechanism, or an artifact of PCR reagents. More studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism of DNA stimulated sperm motility.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Green J, Monteiro E, Bolton VN, Sanders P, Gibson PE: Detection of human papillomavirus DNA by PCR in semen from patients with and without penile warts. Genitourin Med 1991;67:207-210
Ostrow RS, Zachow KR, Niimura M, Okagaki T, Muller S, Bender M, Faras AJ: Detection of papillomavirus DNA in human semen. Science 1986;31:731-733
Chan PJ, Su BC, Kalugdan TH, Tredway DR: Human papillomavirus gene sequences in washed human sperm DNA. Fertil Steril 1994;61:982-985
Chan PJ: Transgenic sperm. Assist Reprod Rev 1997;7:100-103
Francolini M, Lavitrano M, Lamia CL, French D, Frati L, Cotelli F, Spadafora C: Evidence for nuclear internalization of exogenous DNA into mammalian sperm cells. Mol Reprod Dev 1993;34:133-139
McClure RD, Nunes L, Tom R: Semen manipulation: Improved sperm recovery and function with a two-layer Percoll gradient. Fertil Steril 1989;51:874-877
Burkman LJ: Discrimination between nonhyperactivated and classical hyperactivated motility patterns in human sperm using computerized analysis. Fertil Steril 1991;55:363-371
Ting Y, Manos MM: Detection and typing of genital human papillomavirus. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, MA Innis, DH Gelfnad, JJ Sninsky, TJ White (eds). San Diego, Academic Press, 1990, pp 356-367
Maione B, Lavitrano M, Spadafora C, Kiessling AA: Spermmediated gene transfer in mice. Mol Reprod Dev 1998;50:406-409
Zoraqi G, Spadafora C: Integration of foreign DNA sequences into mouse sperm genome. DNA Cell Biol 1997;16:291-300
DeGeyter C, Degeyter M, Koppers B, Nieschlag E: Diagnostic accuracy of computer-assisted sperm motion analysis. Hum Reprod 1998;13:2512-2520
Lai YM, Lee JF, Huang HY, Soong YK, Yang FP, Pao CC: The effect of human papillomavirus infection on sperm cell motility. Fertil Steril 1997;67:1152-1155
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brossfield, J.E., Chan, P.J., Patton, W.C. et al. Tenacity of Exogenous Human Papillomavirus DNA in Sperm Washing. J Assist Reprod Genet 16, 325–328 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020458100382
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020458100382