Abstract
Using the time-dependent wave function we have studied the properties of the atomic transverse motion in an interferometer, and the cause of the non-classical behavior of atoms reported by Kurtsiefer, Pfau, and Mlynek [Nature 386, 150 (1997)]. The transverse wave function is derived from the solution of the two-dimensional Schrödinger's equation, written in the form of the Fresnel–Kirchhoff diffraction integral. It is assumed that the longitudinal motion is classical. Comparing data of the space distribution and of the transverse momentum distribution in interferometers with one and two open slits, it follows that the atomic motion is influenced by the atomic matter wave and violates the laws of classical mechanics. However, the negative values of Wigner's function should not be taken as evidence that the atoms in an interferometer violate the classical statistical law of the addition of positive probabilities. This inference follows from the comparison of properties of Wigner's function and of the de Broglian probability density in phase space.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ch. Kurtsiefer, T. Pfau, and J. Mlynek, “Measurement of the Wigner function of an ensemble of helium atoms,” Nature 386, 150 (1997).
T. Pfau and Ch. Kurtsiefer, “Partial reconstruction of the motional Wigner function of an ensemble of helium atoms,” J. Modern Opt. 44, 2551 (1997).
D. Leibfried, T. Pfau, and C. Monroe, “Shadows and mirrors: Reconstructing quantum states of atom motion,” Physics Today p. 22 (April 1998).
S. I. Tomonaga, Quantum Mechanics, Vol. II (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1962).
W. H. Zurek, “Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical,” Physics Today p. 36 (October 1991).
R. Bonifacio and S. Olivares, “Young's experiment, Schrödinger's spread and spontaneous intrinsic decoherence,” in Proceedings 3rd Workshop on Mysteries, Puzzles and Paradoxes in Quantum Mechanics, R. Bonifacio et al., eds. Z. Naturforsch. 56a, 41 (2001)
M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1965).
A. Zeilinger, R. Gaehler, C. G. Shull, and W. Treimer, “Experimental status and recent results of neutron interference optics,” ''Neutron Scattering'' Argonne National Laboratory Conference (1981): American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings No. 89 (New York, 1982).
M. Božic´, D. Arsenovic´, and L. Vuškovic´, “Transverse momentum distribution of atoms in an interferometer,” Z. Naturforsch. 56a, 173 (2001).
D. Arsenovic´, M. Božic´, and L. Vučkovic´, “Is the classical law of the addition of probabilities violated in quantum interference?,” J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 4, S358 (2002).
E. Hecht, Optics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1987).
E. Wigner, “On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium,” Phys. Rev. 40, 749 (1932).
J. E. Moyal, “Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory,” Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 45, 99 (1949).
E. Wigner, “Quantum-mechanical distribution functions revisited,” in Perspectives in Quantum Theory, W. Yourgrau and A. van der Merwe, eds. (M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1971).
M. Hillery, R. F. O'Connell, M. O. Scully, and E. P. Wigner, “Distribution functions in physics: Fundamentals,” Phys. Rep. 106, 121 (1984).
V. V. Dodonov, E. V. Kurmyshev, and V. I. Man'ko, “Generalized uncertainty relation and correlated coherent states,” Phys. Lett. A 79, 150 (1980).
L. Cohen and Y. I. Zaparovanny, “Positive quantum joint distributions,” J. Math. Phys. 21, 794 (1980).
L. Cohen, “Probability distributions with given multivariate marginals,” J. Math. Phys. 25, 2402 (1984).
H. Margenau and N. Hill, “Correlation between measurement in quantum theory,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 26, 722 (1961).
F. H. Frohner, “Missing link between probability theory and quantum mechanics: The Riesz-Fejer theorem,” Z. Naturforsch. 53a, 637 (1998).
M. Božic´ and Z. Maric´, “Probabilities of de Broglie's trajectories in Mach-Zehnder and in neutron interferometers,” Phys. Lett. A 158, 33 (1991).
M. Božic´ and Z. Maric´, “Compatible statistical interpretation of a wave packet,” Found. Phys. 25, 159 (1995).
M. Božic´ and Z. Maric´, “Quantum interference, quantum theory of measurement and (in) completeness of quantum mechanics,” Found. Phys. 28, 415 (1998).
H. Kaiser, R. Clothier, S. A. Werner, H. Rauch, and H. Wolwitsch, “Coherence and spectral filtering in neutron interferometry,” Phys. Rev. 45, 31 (1992).
M. Božic´ and D. Arsenovic´, “Comparison of Wigner's function and de Broglian probability density for a wave packet and the wave packets superposition,” in Epistemological and Experimental Perspectives on Quantum Physics, D. Greenberger et al., eds. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1999), p. 225.
P. B. Lerner, H. Rauch, and M. Suda, “Wigner-function calculations for the coherent superposition of matter waves,” Phys. Rev. A 51, 3889 (1995).
M. Suda, “Wigner function in neutron interferometry,” Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 7, 901 (1995).
U. Janicke and M. Wilkens, “Tomography of atom beams,” J. Mod. Opt. 42, 2183 (1995).
L. de Broglie, The Current Interpretation of Wave Mechanics, A Critical Study (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1964).
D. Bohm and J. P. Vigier, “Model of the causal interpretation of quantum theory in terms of a fluid with irregular fluctuations,” Phys. Rev. 96, 208 (1954).
F. Selleri, “Can an actual existence be granted to quantum waves?,” Ann. Fond. L. de Broglie 7, 45 (1982).
M. G. Raymer, M. Beck, and D. F. McAlister, “Measurement of the Wigner distribution and the density matrix of a light mode using optical homodyne tomography: Application to squeezed states and the vacuum,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1137 (1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vušković, L., Arsenović, D. & Božić, M. Non-Classical Behavior of Atoms in an Interferometer. Foundations of Physics 32, 1329–1346 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020365405788
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020365405788