Skip to main content
Log in

Making Sense of a World of Clicks

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a recent article, O. Ulfbeck and A. Bohr [Found. Phys. 31, 757 (2001)] have stressed the genuine fortuitousness of detector clicks, which has also been pointed out, in different terms, by the present author [Am. J. Phys. 68, 728 (2000)]. In spite of this basic agreement, the present article raises objections to the presuppositions and conclusions of Ulfbeck and Bohr, in particular their rejection of the terminology of indefinite variables, their identification of reality with “the world of experience,” their identification of experience with what takes place “on the spacetime scene,” and the claim that their interpretation of quantum mechanics is “entirely liberated” from classical notions. An alternative way of making sense of a world of uncaused clicks is presented. This does not invoke experience but deals with a free-standing reality, is not fettered by classical conceptions of space and time but introduces adequate ways of thinking about the spatiotemporal aspects of the quantum world, and does not reject indefinite variables but clarifies the implications of their existence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. O. Ulfbeck and A. Bohr, “Genuine fortuitousness. Where did that click come from?, ” Found. Phys. 31 (5), 757–774 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Einstein, Briefwechsel 1916–1955 von Albert Einstein und Hedwig und Max Born (Nymphenburger Verlagshandlung, Munich, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  3. U. Mohrhoff, “What quantum mechanics is trying to tell us, ” Am. J. Phys. 68 (8), 728–745 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Laloë, “Do we really understand quantum mechanics? Strange correlations, paradoxes, and theorems, ” Am. J. Phys. 69 (6), 655–701 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. H. Lieb, “The stability of matter, ” Rev. Mod. Phys. 48 (4), 553–569 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  6. U. Mohrhoff, “Objective probabilities, quantum counterfactuals, and the ABL rule— A response to R.E. Kastner, ” Am. J. Phys. 69 (8), 864–873 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. Bohr, in J. Honner, “The transcendental philosophy of Niels Bohr, ” Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 13 (1), 1–29 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Kac and S. M. Ulam, Mathematics and Logic (Penguin Books, New York, NY, 1979), p. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures in Physics, Vol. 3 (Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA, 1965), Sec. 1–1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Bohm, “A suggested interpretation of quantum theory in terms of hidden variables, ” Phys. Rev. 85, 166–193 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber, “Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems, ” Phys. Rev. D 34, 470–491 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Arndt, O. Nairz, J. Vos-Andreae, C. Keller, G. van der Zouw, and A. Zeilinger, “Wave-particle duality of C60 molecules, ” Nature 401, 680–682 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  13. U. Mohrhoff, “Beyond the cookie cutter paradigm, ” in Consciousness and Its Transformation: Papers presented at the Second International Conference on Integral Psychology, M. Cornelissen, ed. (Sri Aurobindo International Centre of Education, Pondicherry, 2001), pp. 333–345.

    Google Scholar 

  14. U. Mohrhoff, “Quantum mechanics and the cookie cutter paradigm, ” arXiv:quant-ph/ 0009001.

  15. A. Clark, A Theory of Sentience (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. London and E. Bauer, “The theory of observation in quantum mechanics, ” in Quantum Theory and Measurement, J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek, eds. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1983), pp. 217–259.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. P. Wigner, “Remarks on the mind–body question, ” in The Scientist Speculates, I. J. Good, ed. (Heinemann, London, 1961), pp. 284–302.

    Google Scholar 

  19. W. Heisenberg, “The representation of nature in contemporary physics, ” Daedalus 87, 95–108 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. A. Fuchs and A. Peres, “Quantum theory needs no ‘interpretation’, ” Phys. Today 53 (3), 70–71 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. S. Bell, “Against ‘measurement’, ” in 62 Years of Uncertainty, A. I. Miller, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1990), pp. 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. P. Feynman, “Space-time approach to nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, ” Rev. Mod. Phys. 20, 367–387 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. P. Feynman and A. R. Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals (McGraw–Hill, New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohrhoff, U. Making Sense of a World of Clicks. Foundations of Physics 32, 1295–1311 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019775404748

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019775404748

Navigation