Abstract
A great effort has been devoted to formulating a classical relativistic theory of spin compatible with quantum relativistic wave equations. The main difficulty in connecting classical and quantum theories rests in finding a parameter that plays the role of proper time at a purely quantum level. We present a partial review of several proposals of classical and quantum spin theories from the pioneering works of Thomas and Frenkel, revisited in the classical BMT work, to the semiclassical model of Barut and Zanghi. We show that the last model can be obtained from a semiclassical limit of the Feynman proper time parametrization of the Dirac equation. At the quantum level, we derive spin precession equations in the Heisenberg picture. Analogies and differences with respect to classical theories are discussed in detail.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
S. I. Rubinow and J. B. Keller, Phys. Rev. 131, 2789 (1963).
K. Rafanelli and R. Schiller, Phys. Rev. 135, B279 (1964).
J. P. Aparicio, F. H. Gaioli, and E. T. Garcia Alvarez, Phys. Rev. A 51, 96 (1995).
V. Fock, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 12, 404 (1937).
G. Beck, Rev. Faculdade Ciencias Coimbra 10, 66 (1942).
E. C. G. Stückelberg, Helv. Phys. Acta 14, 322 (1941); 15, 23 (1942).
R. P. Feynman, Alternative Formulation of Quantum Electrodynamics (Pocono Conference, Pennsylvania, 1948), quoted in Ref. 39.
R. P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. 80, 440 (1950).
R. P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. 84, 108 (1951).
Y. Nambu, Prog. Theor. Phys. 5, 82 (1950).
J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 82, 664 (1951).
J. Frenkel, Z. Phys. 37, 243 (1926).
L. T. Thomas, Phil. Mag. 3, 1 (1927).
V. Bargmann, L. Michel, and V. L. Telegdi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 435 (1959).
A. O. Barut and N. Zanghi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 2009 (1984).
M. Mathisson, Acta Phys. Polon. 6, 163 (1937); 6, 218 (1937).
J. Weyssenhoff and A. Raabe, Acta Phys. Polon. 9, 7 (1947); 9, 19 (1947).
A. Papapetrou, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London ) A209, 248 (1951).
H. A. Kramers, Physica 1, 825 (1934).
W. Pauli, Helv. Phys. Acta 5, 179 (1932).
E. T. Garcia Alvarez, Ph.D. thesis, Universidad de Buenos Aires (in preparation).
L. Michel and A. S. Wightman, Phys. Rev. 98, 1190 (1955).
J. P. Aparicio, F. H. Gaioli, E. T. Garcia Alvarez, D. F. Hurtado de Mendoza, and A. J. Kálnay, Anales AFA 3, 46 (1991).
J. P. Aparicio, F. H. Gaioli, and E. T. Garcia Alvarez, Anales AFA 4, 9 (1992).
J. P. Aparicio, F. H. Gaioli, and E. T. Garcia Alvarez, Phys. Lett. A 200, 233 (1995).
E. T. Garcia Alvarez and F. H. Gaioli, In Proceedings of the XXIInternational Colloquium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics, Vol. 1 (Group 21), H. E. Doebner, W. Scherer, and P. Natermann, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997), p. 514.
E. T. Garcia Alvarez and F. H. Gaioli, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 36, 2391 (1997).
E. T. Garcia Alvarez and F. H. Gaioli, Found. Phys. 28, 1529 (1998).
A. O. Barut and W. Thacker, Phys. Rev. D 31, 2076 (1985).
R. P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. 76, 749 (1949).
F. H. Gaioli and E. T. Garcia Alvarez, Am. J. Phys. 63, 177 (1995).
A. Proca, J. Phys. Rad. 15, 65 (1954).
A. O. Barut and M. Pavsic, Class. Quantum Grav. 4, L41 (1987); 4, L131 (1987).
A. O. Barut and N. Unäl, Found. Phys. 23, 1423 (1993).
A. O. Barut and W. Thacker, Phys. Rev. D 31, 1386 (1985).
K. Huang, J. Phys. 20, 479 (1952).
A. O. Barut and A. J. Bracken, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2454 (1981).
A. O. Barut and M. G. Cruz, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 26, 6499 (1993).
S. S. Schweber, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 449 (1986).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gaioli, F.H., Alvarez, E.T.G. Classical and Quantum Theories of Spin. Foundations of Physics 28, 1539–1550 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018834217984
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018834217984