Skip to main content
Log in

Female and Male College Students' Responses to Negative Feedback from Parents and Peers

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine whether female and male collegestudents differ in their tendencies to reject negativeevaluative feedback in transactions with parents andwith male and female peers. The predominantly white respondents described specific,“real-life” instances of negative feedbackfrom each of four sources (mother, father, female peer,male peer), rating their relationships with eachfeedback sender (closeness, interaction frequency),characteristics of the feedback itself (importance,negativity, directness), their own emotional response(degree of negative affect), and their rejection (vs.acceptance) of the feedback. Participants also completed aglobal self-esteem measure. Though no simple directeffects of gender upon rejection of feedback wereobtained, women showed an overall pattern of greater rejection of feedback as a consequence ofseveral indirect effects. Women reported receivingfeedback on more important topics, and greaterimportance of feedback was related to less rejection.However, women also tended to receive more negativefeedback from others and tended to respond with strongernegative feelings, both of these variables being linkedto greater rejection of feedback. The results challenge various common assumptions in thegender roles literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, J. G. (1982). Family relationships and self-esteem. In M. Rosenberg & H. B. Kaplan (Eds.), Social psychology of the self concept. Arlington Heights, IL: Harlan Davidson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banaji, M. R., & Prentice, D. A. (1994). The self in social contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 297–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaine, B., & Crocker, J. (1993). Self-esteem and self-serving biases in reactions to positive and negative events: An integrative review. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner's.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H. M. (1979). Statistically combining independent studies: A meta-analysis of sex differences in conformity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 131–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crano, W. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1986). Principles and methods of social research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Laere, K. H., Lundgren, D. C., & Howe, S. R. (in press). The electronic mirror: Human-computer interaction and change in self-appraisals. Computers in Human Behavior.

  • Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1978). Sex differences in influenceability. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 86–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkin, F., & Handel, G. (1989). The child and society: The process of socialization (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R. B. (1993). The (somewhat) social self: How others affect self-appraisals. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 4). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Varian, C. (1988). Predicting and accepting personality test scores. Personality & Individual Differences, 9, 735–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gecas, V., & Burke, P. (1995). Self and identity. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1985). Compensatory self-inflation: A response to the threat to self-regard of public failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 273–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1986). The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1996). Historical roots of contemporary issues involving self-concept. In B. A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept: Developmental, social, and clinical considerations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (1992). Self-concept. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1989). Self-discrepancy theory: What patterns of self-beliefs cause people to suffer? In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1977). Sex differences in empathy and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 712–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichiyama, M. A. (1993). A longitudinal analysis of the reflected appraisal process in small group interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. V. (1991). The relational self: A new perspective for understanding women's development. In J. Strauss & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), The self: Interdisciplinary approaches. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jussim, L., Coleman, L., & Nassau, S. (1987). The influence of self-esteem on perceptions of performance and feedback. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 95–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jussim, L., Soffin, S., Brown, R., Ley, J., & Kohlhepp, K. (1992). Understanding reactions to feedback by integrating ideas from symbolic interactionism and cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 402–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jussim, L., Yen, H., & Aiello, J. R. (1995). Self-consistency, self-enhancement, and accuracy in reactions to feedback. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 322–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Howard B. (1986). Social psychology of self-referent behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernis, M. H., Brockner, J., & Frankel, B. S. (1989). Self-esteem and reactions to failure: The mediating role of overgeneralization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 707–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren, D. C., Sampson, E. B., & Cahoon, M. B. (1998). Undergraduate men's and women's responses to positive and negative feedback about academic performance. Psychological Reports, 82, 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Cross, S. (1990). The interpersonal self. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Oyserman, D. (1989). Gender and thought: the role of the self-concept. In M. Crawford & M. Hamilton (Eds.), Gender and thought (pp. 100–127). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Wurff, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A., Young, A. L., & Sato, S. (1988). Emotional empathy and associated individual differences. Current Psychology Research and Reviews, 7, 221–240. (Cited in Higgins & Kruglanski, 1996.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D.T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T. (1991). Gender and the influence of evaluations of self-assessments in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1989). Sex differences in reactions to evaluative feedback. Sex Roles, 21, 725–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1994). Gender comparisons in responsiveness to others' evaluations in achievement settings. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 221–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruble, D. N., & Martin, C. L. (1998). Gender development. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd-Look, D. L. (1982). Sex differentiation and the development of sex roles. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of developmental psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrauger, J. S. (1975). Responses to evaluation as a function of initial self-perceptions. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 581–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrauger, J. S., & Schoeneman, T. J. (1979). Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept: Through the looking glass darkly. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 549–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smalley, R. L., & Stake, J. E. (1996). Evaluating sources of ego-threatening feedback: Self-esteem and narcissism effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 483–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Deaux, K., & Helmreich, R. L. (1985). Sex roles in contemporary American society. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1997). “In the beginning there is society”: Lessons from a sociological social psychology. In C. McGarty & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The message of social psychology. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W. B., Jr., Griffin, J. J., Predmore, S. C., & Gaines, B. (1987). The cognitive affective crossfire: When self-consistency confronts self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 881–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W. B., Jr., & Read, S. J. (1981). Self-verification processes: How we sustain our self-conceptions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 351–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W. B., Jr., & Schroeder, D. G. (1995). The search for beauty and truth: A framework for understanding reactions to evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1307–1318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesser, A., & Martin, L. (1996). The psychology of evaluation. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M., Jr., & Foschi, M. (1988). Status generalization: New theory and research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, M. G. (1995). Sex category and gender in social psychology. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, R. C. (1979). The self concept: Vol. 2. Theory and research on selected topics. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lundgren, D.C., Rudawsky, D.J. Female and Male College Students' Responses to Negative Feedback from Parents and Peers. Sex Roles 39, 409–429 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018823126219

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018823126219

Keywords

Navigation