Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 561–584 | Cite as

Spontaneous Emission from the Ground Atomic State due to Its Crossing with the Dynamic Stark Level

  • Olga Kocharovskaya
  • Y. V. Radeonychev
Article

Abstract

The ground state of the driven three-level atomic system becomes unstable as a result of its spontaneous decay to the dynamic Stark level when the last one falls below this state. Different peculiarities of the atomic response may appear depending on the intensity and detuning of the driving field providing such level crossing.

Keywords

Spontaneous Emission Atomic System Spontaneous Decay Stark Level Atomic Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    E. A. Hinds and V. Sandoghdar, Phys. Rev. A 43, 398 (1991).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Meschede, Phys. Rep. 211, 201 (1992).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. Yamamoto, S. Machida, and G. Bjork, Opt. Quantum Electron. 24, 215 (1992); Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 7, 1653 (1993).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. P. Dowling, Found. Phys. 23, 895 (1993); H. Chew, Phys. Rev A 38, 3410 (1988).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. O. Barut and J. P. Dowling, Phys. Rev. A 36, 649 (1987).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Sajeev and T. Quang, Phys. Rev. A 50, 1764 (1994).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. V. Kocharovsky, Vl. V. Kocharovsky, and A. A. Belyanin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3285 (1996).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    O. Kocharovskaya, S.-Y. Zhu, M. O. Scully, P. Mandel, and Y. V. Radeonychev, Phys. Rev. A 49, 4928 (1994).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Cohen-Tannoudji and S. Reynaud, J. Phys. B.: At. Mol. Phys. 10(3), 345 (1977).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. Kocharovskaya and Y. V. Radeonychev, Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 8, 7 (1996).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Lewenstein, T. W. Mossberg, and R. J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 775 (1987). M. Lewenstein and T. W. Mossberg, Phys. Rev. A 37, 2048 (1988); Y. S. Bai, A. G. Yodh, and T. W. Mossberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1277 (1985).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Y. Zhu, A. Lezama, T. W. Mossberg, and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1946 (1988); W. Lange and H. Walter, Phys. Rev. A 48, 4551 (1993); G. S. Agarwal, W. Lange, and H. Walter, Phys. Rev. A 48, 4555 (1993).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. H. Keitel, P. L. Knight, L. M. Narducci, and M. O. Scully, Opt. Commun. 118, 143 (1995).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    O. Kocharovskaya, P. Mandel, and M. O. Scully, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2451 (1995).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. L. Cohen and P. R. Berman, Phys. Rev. A 54, 1686 (1996).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    O. Kocharovskaya, P. Mandel, Y. V. Radeonychev, and M. O. Scully, submitted to Phys. Rev. A.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Rzazewski and K. Wodkiewicz, Phys. Rev. A 43, 593 (1991).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olga Kocharovskaya
  • Y. V. Radeonychev

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations