Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 19, Issue 8, pp 355–362 | Cite as

Influence of Polarization Effects in Ooplasma and Pronuclei on Embryo Quality and Implantation in an IVF Program

  • Thomas StalfEmail author
  • Julio Herrero
  • Claas Mehnert
  • Konstantin Manolopoulos
  • Andreas Lenhard
  • Holger Gips


Purpose: The presence of a clear half-moon-like zone of cytoplasm in oocytes is called “halo effect.” The prognostic value of this effect is not yet determined. Aligned nucleoli in pronuclei (PN) represent a further polarization phenomenon and a marker for implantation potential. Aim of the prospective study was to evaluate the influence of the halo effect on IVF outcome and to compare the results with observed polarization in PN.

Methods: A total of 374 cycles with embryonic transfer were analyzed regarding halo effect and pattern of nucleoli. The oocytes were single-cultured to observe the following embryo quality of each PN stage.

Results: Cycles with halo-positive oocytes showed a significant higher pregnancy rate (44.0% vs. 31.1%; p < 0.05). Furthermore, higher pregnancy rates in cycles with polarized nucleoli were observed. Polarized PN resulted in a significant lower fragmentation and higher cleavage rate of embryos. The fragmentation rate was significantly lower in halo+ oocytes, but the cleavage rate was not influenced.

Conclusions: The results indicate that the presence of a polarized zone of human fertilized oocytes can be a useful indicator for good oocyte quality. Since the origin of ooplasmic polarization seems to be a different process compared with the alignment of nucleoli, the observation will give additional predictive information about the implantation potential.

Embryo quality halo effect oocyte polarization pronuclei 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Denker HW: Cell lineage, determination and differentiation in earliest developmental stages in mammals. Biblog Anat 1983;24:22-58Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gardner RL: Polarity in early mammalian development. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1999;9:417-421Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gardner RL: Scrambled or bisected mouse eggs and the basis of patterning in mammals. Bioessays 1999;21:271-274Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Selwood L: Mechanisms for pattern formation leading to axis formation and lineage allocation in mammals:Amarsupial perspective. Reproduction 2001;5:677-683Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Edwards RG, Beard HK: Oocyte polarity and cell determination in early mammalian embryos. Mol Hum Reprod 1997;10:863-905Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edwards RG: The role of embryonic polarities in preimplantation growth and implantation of mammalian embryos. Hum Reprod 2000;15(Suppl 6):1-8Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scott LA: Oocyte and embryo polarity. Sem Reprod Med 2000;18:171-183Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Blerkom J, Davis P: Evolution of the sperm aster after microinjection of isolated human sperm centrosomesinto meiotically mature human oocytes. Hum Reprod 1995;10:2179-2182Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Serhal PF, Ranieri DM, Kinis A, Marchant S, Davies M, Khadum IM: Oocyte morphology predicts outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1267-1270Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scott LA, Smith S: The successful use of pronuclear embryo transfers in the day following oocyte retrival. Hum Reprod 1998;13:1003-1013Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tesarik J, Greco E: The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by a single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1318-1323Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Steer CV, Mills CL, Tan SL, Campbell S, Edwards RG: The cumulative embryo score:Apredictive embryoscoring technique to select the optimal number of embryos to transfer in an invitro-fertilization and embryo transfer program. Hum Reprod 1992;7:117-119Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koyama H, Suzuki H, Yang X, Jiang S, Foote RH: Analysis of polarity of bovine and rabbit embryos by scanning electron microscopy. Biol Reprod 1994;50:163-170Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Santella L, Alikani M, Talansky BE, Cohen J, Dale B: Is the human oocyte plasma membrane polarized? Hum Reprod 1992;7:999-1003Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Calarco PG: Polarization of mitochondria in the unfertilized mouse oocyte. Dev Genet 1995;16:36-43Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Antczak M, Van Blerkom J: Temporal and spartial aspects of fragmentation in early human embryos: Possible effects on developmental competence and association with the differential elimination of regulatory proteins from polarized domains. Hum Reprod 1999;14:429-447Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    van der Ven H, Montag M: Multicentre-study to determine the possible correlation between pronuclear morphology and success or ART treatment. Hum Reprod 2001;16(Abstract Book 1):7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Stalf
    • 1
    Email author
  • Julio Herrero
    • 2
  • Claas Mehnert
    • 1
  • Konstantin Manolopoulos
    • 2
  • Andreas Lenhard
    • 2
  • Holger Gips
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Reproductive MedicineGiessenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsJustus-Liebig-UniversityGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations