, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 1–12 | Cite as

Attachment characteristics of normal human cells and virus-infected cells on microcarriers

  • Bok-Hwan Chun
  • Soo-Il ChungEmail author


The attachment kinetics of normal and virus-infected LuMA cells were studied to improve the production of live attenuated varicella viruses in human embryonic lung (LuMA) cells. Normal LuMA cells and LuMA cells infected by varicella virus at various cytopathic effects (CPE) were grown on microcarriers. Ninety-three percent of suspended LuMA cells attached to the solid surface microcarriers within fifteen minutes and cell viability was greater than 95% when the cell suspension was stirred. Low serum levels did not affect the attachment rate of virus-infected cells in the microcarrier culture system. Kinetic studies showed that varicella infected cells had a lower attachment rate than normal LuMA cells. Virus inoculum (= infected cells) at low CPE showed a relatively better attachment rate on cell-laden microcarriers than virus inoculum at a higher CPE. Maximum titers were obtained at 2 days post-infection. Based on cell densities, the use of viral inoculum showing a 40% CPE led to an approximately 2- and 1.2-fold increase in the cell associated and in cell free viruses, respectively, than a virus inoculum with a CPE of 10%.However, the ratio of cell-free to cell-associated virus in a microcarrier culture was very low, approximately0.04–0.06. These studies demonstrate that the virus inoculum resulting in a high CPE yielded a high production of cell-associated and cell-free virus in microcarrier cultures because of the high cellular affinity of the varicella virus.

attachment rate cytopathic effect human embryonic lung cell microcarrier culture virus-infected cell 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chun BH, Park SY and Moon HM (1996) Production of live attenuated varicella-zoster virus in human embryonic lung cells using microcarrier.Biotechnol Techniques 10: 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clark JM and Hirtenstein MD (1981) Optimizing culture conditions for the production of animal cells in microcarrier culture. Ann NY Acad Sci 369: 330–46.Google Scholar
  3. Clark JM, Hirtenstein MD and Gebb C (1980) Critical parameters in the microcarrier culture of animal cells.Dev Biol Stand46: 117–124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Forestell SP, Kalogerakis N and Behie LA (1992) Low-serum medium development for human diploid fibroblast microcarrier culture.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol38: 165–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Griffiths B and Thornton B (1982) Use of microcarrier culture for the production of herpes simplex virus (type 2) in LUMA cells. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 32: 324–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Himes VB and Hu WS (1988) Serial propagation of mammalian cells on gelatin-coated microcarriers.Biotechnol Bioeng32: 1037–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hu WS and Peshwa MV (1991) Animal cell bioreactors - recent advances and challenges to scale-up.Can J Chem Eng 69: 409–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Levine DW, Wang DIC and Thilly WG (1979) Optimization of growth surface parameters in microcarrier culture.Biotechnol Bioeng21: 821–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lim HS, Han BK and Kim JH (1992) Spartial distribution of mammalian cells grown on macroporous microcarriers with improved attachment kinetics.Biotechnol Prog 8: 486–493.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Morandi M and Valeri A (1982) Continuous dialysis of cultures of human diploid cells (LUMA) grown on microcarriers.Biotechnol Lett 4: 465–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nahapetian AT (1986) In: Thilly WG (ed) Mammalian Cell Technology, Butterworth, Stoneham (pp. 151–165).Google Scholar
  12. Nikolai TJ and Hu WS (1992) Cultivation of mammalian cells on macroporous microcarriers.Enzyme Microb Technol 14:203–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nilsson K (1989) Microcarrier cell culture.Biotech Genet Eng Rev 6: 403.Google Scholar
  14. Pharmacia (1981) Microcarrier cell culture: Principles and methods. Uppsala.Google Scholar
  15. Pharmacia (1991) Microcarrier cell culture: Scale-up, methods. Uppsala.Google Scholar
  16. Suzuki M and Sakai Y (1992) Effect of protein adsorption on cell attachment on solid surfaces. In: Murakami H et al. (eds) Animal Cell Technology: Basic and Applied Aspects (pp. 71–76), Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Van Wezel AL (1967) Growth of cell strains and primary cells on microcarrier in homogeneous culture.Nature216:64–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jeil Biotech. Inc.DaeguKorea
  2. 2.MOGAM Biotechnology Research InstituteKyonggidoKorea

Personalised recommendations