Skip to main content
Log in

Hidden Variables and Bell Inequalities on Quantum Logics

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the quantum logic approach, Bell inequalities in the sense of Pitowski are related with quasi hidden variables in the sense of Deliyannis. Some properties of hidden variables on effect algebras are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. V. Alda, “On 0–1 measure for projectors II,” Aplikace Matematiky 26, 57–58 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. S. Bell, “On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics,” Rev.Mod.Phys. 38, 447–452 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. G. Beltrametti and G. Cassinelli, The Logic of Quantm Mechanics (Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Beltrametti and M. Mńczyński, “On a characterization of classical and nonclassical probabilities,” J.Math.Phys. 32, 1280–1286 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. K. Bennett and D. J. Foulis, “A generalized Sasaki projection for affect algebras,” Tatra Mt.math.Publ. 15, 55–65 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. Beran, Orthomodular Lattices, Algebraic Approach (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Cattaneo, R. Giuntini, and S. Pulmannová, “Topological and degenerate Brouwer– Zadeh posets applications to fuzzy sets and unsharp quantum theories,” Found.Phys. 30 (2000).

  8. G. Chevalier and S. Pulmannová, “Semiprime ideals in orthomodular posets,” Contributions to General Algebra 12, 135–143 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Chovanec and F. Kôpka, Boolean D-posets,” Tatra Mt.Math.Publ. 10, 107–121 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. B. D'Andrea and S. Pulmannová, “ Quasivarities of orthomodular lattices,” Rep. Math.Phys. 27, 688–699 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. C. Deliyannis, “Generalized hidden variables theorem,” J.Math.Phys. 12, 1013–1017 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Dvurečenskij and H. Länger, “Bell-type inequalities in orthomodular lattices I, II,” Int. J.Theor.Phys. 34, 995–1024, 1025–1038 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Dvurečenskij and S. Pulmannová, New Trends in Quantum Structures (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. J. Foulis and M. K. Bennett, “Effect algebras and unsharp quantum logics,” Found. Phys. 24, 1325–1346 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Giuntini, Quantum Logic and Hidden Variables (Bibliographishes Institut, Mannheim, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. P. Gudder, Stochastic Methods in Quantum Mechanics (Elsevier, North-Holland, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. P. Gudder and S. Pulmannová, “Quotients of Partial Abelian Monoids,” Algebra Universalis 38, 395–421 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. R. Halmos, Measure Theory (Van Nostrand, New York, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Kalmbach, Orthomodular Lattices (Academic, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Kochen and E. P. Specker, “The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics,” J.Math.Mech. 17, 59–87 (1867).

    Google Scholar 

  21. F. Koôka and F. Chovanec, “D-posets,” Math.Slovaca 44, 21–34 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Lahti, “Uncertainty and complementarity in axiomatic quantum mechanics,” Int.J. Theor.Phys. 19, 780–842 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. Marsden, “The commutator and solvability in a generalized orthomodular lattice,” Pacific J.Math. 33, 457–361 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. R. Phelps, Lectures on Choquet's Theorem (Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  25. O. Pitowski, Quantum Probability-Quantum Logic (Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 321) (Springer, Berlin, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  26. P. Pták and S. Pulmannová, Orthomodular Structures as Quantum Logics (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Pulmannová, “Bell inequalities and quantum logics,” in The Interpretations of Quantum Theory: Where Do We Stand?, L. Accardi, ed. (Encyclopedia Italiana, Roma, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. Pulmannová and V. Majerník, “Bell inequalities on quantum logics,” J.Math.Phys. 33, 2173–2178 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. Pykacz, “On Bell type inequalities in quantum logics,” in The concept of Probability, E. J. Bitsakis and C. A. Nicolaides, eds. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. Pykacz and E. Santos, “Hidden variables in quantum logic approach revisited,” J.Math.Phys. 32, 1287–1292 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Z. Riečanová, “Generalization of blocks for D-lattices and lattice ordered effect algebras,” Int.J.Theor.Phys. 39, 859–869 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Tkadlec, “Conditions that force an orthomodular poset to be a Boolean algebra,” Tatra Mt.Math.Publ. 10, 117–135 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  33. V. S. Varadarajan, Geometry of Quantum Theory (Springer, Berlin, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  34. M. Zisis, “Approximate hidden variables,” Found.Phys. 30, 971–1000 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pulmannová, S. Hidden Variables and Bell Inequalities on Quantum Logics. Foundations of Physics 32, 193–216 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014424425657

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014424425657

Navigation